Develop Guidance for Staff Review of New Build License Applications for Advanced Reactor Projects
Operator Training and Qualification
Objective/Scope: CNSC and USNRC staff will share regulatory experiences and insights associated with operator training and qualification. An exchange of information between the CNSC and USNRC will cover review methodologies, regulatory approaches, and treatment of operator training and qualification.
Output: Issuance of a report that will document:
- alignment on key technical areas
- items of mutual understanding that could be used in each regulator’s process for the evaluation and approval of operator training and qualification programs
- key differences in methodologies associated with operator training, experience, eligibility, examination, and licensing/certification
Objective/Scope: CNSC and USNRC staff established a common regulatory position on TRISO fuel qualification based on existing knowledge to identify any potential analytical or testing gaps which would need to be addressed to enable TRISO use in advanced reactor licensing applications. Additional information is available in the Work Plan.
Output: : CNSC and USNRC issued a joint report summarizing data, criteria, and approaches that can help support fuel-related regulatory findings for TRISO-fueled reactor designs. ML23172A242
Scope: CNSC and USNRC compared the criteria/guidance for technology-inclusive, risk-informed, and performance-based staff review of applications for advanced reactors and documented areas of commonality and differences between the Canadian approach and US approach.
Output: CNSC and USNRC issued a joint report comparing the USNRC’s Licensing Modernization Project and Canadian practice. ML21225A101
Classification of Structures, Systems and Components
Scope: CNSC and USNRC will review the safety classification process for structures, systems, and components (SSCs) of each organization and identify key similarities and differences.
Output: CNSC and USNRC issued an interim joint report documenting the commonalities and differences in safety classification of SSCs including an assessment of the impact of these differences on the design.