Safety Concerns Associated with Pipe Breaks in the BWR Scram System (Generic Letter No. 81-20)
UNITED STATES
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555
APR 10 1981
TO ALL BWR LICENSEES
SUBJECT: SAFETY CONCERNS ASSOCIATED WITH PIPE BREAKS IN THE BWR SCRAM
SYSTEM (81-20)
Yesterday, we discussed With Your representatives the NRC's Office of
Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data report entitled, "Safety
Concerns Associated with Pipe Break in the BWR Scram System." The Report
describes a potential sequence of events which could result from a break in
the BWR scram discharge piping during a scram condition concurrent with an
inability to reclose the scram outlet valves. Concerns identified include
the quality of the scram discharge volume piping, the ability to detect and
isolate such a break, and potential water and steam degradation of available
ECCS equipment as a result of the break. A number of recommendations were
made in the report to remedy the potential concerns.
We are presently studying these issues and recommendations to determine
whether BWR design basis accidents should be modified and as a consequence
whether appropriate actions should be taken for operating BWR plants. The
purpose of this letter is to provide to you the AEOD report so that you can
evaluate its applicability to your plant and determine appropriate remedial
measures, and to request information from you concerning your evaluation in
order to assist in determining an appropriate course of action for the NRC.
Therefore, pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) please provide us in writing, under
oath or affirmation, within 45 days of your receipt of this letter, the
following information:
1. A generic evaluation of the applicability of the indicated
sequences of events in the report to the BWR plant design, your
estimate of the probability of occurrence of such sequences, and
the bases for these conclusions,
2. A generic evaluation of the applicability of the indicated safety
concerns and findings in the report relative to BWR plant
construction, design, and operation and the bases for these
conclusions, and
.
BWR Licensees - 2 -
3. A generic evaluation of the recommendations listed in the report
discussing the degree to which the recommendations are being or
have been implemented with bases why the recommendations should or
should not be completely implemented on BWRs.
In addition, pursuant to 50.54(f) provide the following information in
writing within 120 days of your receipt of this letter:
1. Provide an evaluation of the applicability of the 45 day generic
evaluation to your plant. This evaluation should contain plant
specific considerations related to system design, instru-
mentation, construction, operation, operator training, and
emergency procedures for your plant.
2. In light of the AEOD report and the 45 day generic evaluation,
provide a plant specific evaluation of your facility's Scram
Discharge Volume System conformance to GDC 14, GDC 35 GDC 55,
SS50.2(v), 50.55a (including footnote 2): and SS50.46 of the
Commission's regulations. This evaluation should address which
portions of the Scram Discharge Volume System are considered to be
part of the reactor coolant pressure boundary, the quality group
and safety class of the Scram Discharge Volume System, the codes
and standards used for the design, fabrication ,and inservice
inspection of this system and your bases for the above
classifications or groupings.
3. Provide by analysis or reference a demonstration that a break
located anywhere in the Scram Discharge Volume System could meet
the requirements of 650.46 of the Commission's regulations, taking
into account the environmental and flooding aspects of such a
break.
.
BWR Licensees -3-
This request for information was approved by GAO under a blanket clearance
number R0072 which expires November 30, 1983. comments on burden and
duplication may be directed to the U.S. General Accounting Office,
Regulatory Reports Review, Room 5106, 441 G Street, N.W., Washington, D.C.
20548.
Sincerely,
Darrell G. Eisenhut, Director
Division of Licensing
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Enclosure:
As stated
Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021