Information Notice No. 86-05, Supplement 1:Main Steam Safety Valve Test Failures and Ring Setting Adjustments
SSINS No: 6835
IN 86-05, Supplement 1
UNITED STATES
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT
WASHINGTON, DC 20555
October 16, 1986
Information Notice No. NO 86-05, SUPPLEMENT 1: MAIN STEAM SAFETY VALVE
TEST FAILURES AND RING
SETTING ADJUSTMENTS
Addressees:
All nuclear power reactor facilities holding an operating license or a
construction permit
Purpose:
This notice is being provided as a supplement to Information Notice (IN)
86-05 to inform licensees of additional experience with ring setting
adjustments of main steam safety valves (MSSVs) It is expected that
recipients will review the information for applicability to their facilities
and consider actions, if, appropriate, to preclude a similar problem from
occurring at their facilities However, suggestions contained in this
information notice do not constitute NRC requirements; therefore, no
specific action or written response is required
Description of Circumstances:
Seabrook, 1985 (Synopsis)
In the fall of 1984, Seabrook's MSSVs (manufactured by Crosby) were sent to
Wyle Laboratories for testing The results of the tests showed that adequate
disc travel was not attainable with the factory-set ring settings Following
additional testing, the ring settings were adjusted from the factory
settings to obtain the required disc travel
Vogtle, 1986
On May 14, 1986, Georgia Power Company informed the NRC that 5 of the 20
Crosby MSSVs due to be installed on Vogtle 1 were tested to determine the
appropriateness of their as-shipped ring settings (nozzle ring setting of
+150 and guide ring setting of -45) The valve settings did not achieve
specified relieving capacity The typical relieving flow was 75% of the
specified value Subsequently all 20 of the valves were shipped to the
Crosby high-flow test facility to be tested and adjusted as required to
achieve their design relief capacity Final ring settings are summarized in
Attachment 1 Note that these settings in many instances differ considerably
from the as-shipped settings Unit 2 valves are due to be tested in the
future
8610100107
IN 86-05, Supplement 1
October 16, 1986
Page 2 of 2
Millstone 3, 1986
On July 29, 1986 while inspecting the A-bank MSSVs, personnel found that the
upper and lower adjusting rings were not set to the vendor's (Dresser)
recommended settings After an investigation, it was determined that the
vendor had not reset the rings following functional testing because of a
procedural inadequacy Millstone 3 personnel reset all rings to the
recommended settings (Licensee Event Report 50/423-86/043)
Susquehanna 1 and 2
Pennsylvania Power and Light personnel recognized the 6R1O designation used
by Seabrook to describe their valves (IN 86-05) as being the same as the
Crosby safety/relief valves (SRVs) installed at Susquehanna Units 1 and 2;
however, the designation 6R1O is not a model number, but the inlet, orifice,
and outlet size of the valve These SRVs are not the same model as the
Seabrook or Vogtle valves, but they do have adjusting rings which determine
the capacity and blowdown of the valves Because of this, the information in
IN 86-05 and this supplement may be applicable to boiling-water reactors
No specific action or written response is required by this information
notice If you have any questions about this matter, please contact the
Regional Administrator of the appropriate regional office or this office
Edward L Jordan Director
Division of Emergency Preparedness
and Engineering Response
Office of Inspection and Enforcement
Technical Contact: Mary S Wegner, IE
(301) 492-4511
Attachment:
1 Summary of Final Rings Settings for Vogtle 1
2 List of Recently Issued IE Information Notices
Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021