Information Notice No. 85-88: Licensee Control of Contracted Services Providing Training
SSINS No.: 6835
IN 85-88
UNITED STATES
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555
November 18, 1985
Information Notice No. 85-88: LICENSEE CONTROL OF CONTRACTED SERVICES
PROVIDING TRAINING
Addressees:
All nuclear power facilities holding an operating license (OL) or a
construction permit (CP).
Purpose:
This information notice is provided to emphasize to licensees their
responsibility for the content of safety-related training courses and
materials provided by consultants to utility employees. It is expected that
recipients will review the information for applicability to their facilities
and consider actions, if appropriate, to preclude the occurrence of similar
problems at their facilities. However, suggestions contained in this
information notice do not constitute NRC requirements; therefore, no
specific action or written response is required.
Discussion:
In August 1985, the NRC learned that potentially misleading course material
was presented to licensee employees by a consulting firm as part of a
training course on containment leak rate testing. This material appeared to
suggest and/or condone practices that could be misleading in the conduct of
an NRC inspection. The following are some excerpts from the training course
material entitled "Interactions With the NRC."
Should the utility inform the NRC of contemplated program
changes? This is debatable.
Alerting NRC opens up utility for comments and second
thoughts.
Springing changes on NRC has benefit of surprise.
Encourage [NRC] inspector to witness a Type C test,
but... don't be foolish:
Note: *Perform demo on an "easy" valve which
has traditionally not been a "problem leaker."
8511150107
.
IN 85-88
November 18, 1985
Page 2 of 3
*NRC will want to concentrate on past problem areas and
pet peeves.
Traditional industry approach to ILRT testing problems
has been predicated on not stating to NRC:
When the test began (thus allowing for repairs
after pressurization commenced)
The "Type A" test failed (since some smooth
talkers have managed to get out of failures)
We'll do it over (since it has been possible
to obtain NRC agreement with statements such
as, "you saw the test before and didn't
comment; why this time when we've done it even
better?")
*These statements appeared in the revised (March 1984)
version of the course as well as the November 1983
version.
During an inspection of the consulting firm, which took place after the NRC
became aware of the problem, it was found that the development and
presentation of this course material was an isolated instance. However, the
inappropriateness of this material would have been detected had the
consulting firm's management reviewed the quality of their product or had
the licensee's management reviewed the training material before it was
presented to their employees. Further, although several of the licensee's
employees raised concerns (through course evaluation forms) to the
consulting firm about the appropriateness of the presentation on
interactions with the NRC, these concerns were apparently not brought to the
attention of licensee management in a timely fashion.
Licensees are responsible for the correctness of the material presented in
training courses at their facilities. All information and points of view
should accurately reflect a licensee's position. As a result of the
described incident, in addition to specific corrective actions, the involved
licensees are reviewing their internal controls over contractor-provided
training and training material. Although during NRC followup the licensees
involved and the consultant's training organization have stated that it was
not their intent to tell the licensee's personnel how to mislead the NRC,
the course attendees may have received this impression. Because open and
honest communications with the NRC are a cornerstone of the regulatory
process, it is imperative that licensees assure themselves that all
safety-related training materials accurately reflect their position and
philosophy.
.
IN 85-88
November 18, 1985
Page 3 of 3
No specific action or response is required by this information notice. If
you have any questions regarding this notice, please contact the Regional
Administrator of the appropriate NRC regional, office or the technical
contact listed below.
Edward L. Jordan Director
Division of Emergency Preparedness
and Engineering Response
Office of Inspection and Enforcement
Technical Contact: E. W. Merschoff, IE
301-402-9045
Attachments: List of Recently Issued IE Information Notices
Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021