Information Notice No. 84-52, Supplement 1: Inadequate Material Procurement Controls on the Part of Licensees and Vendors
SSINS No. 6835 IN 84-52, SUPPLEMENT 1 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555 May 8, 1985 INFORMATION NOTICE NO. 84-52, SUPPLEMENT 1: INADEQUATE MATERIAL PROCUREMENT CONTROLS ON THE PART OF LICENSEES AND VENDORS Addressees: All nuclear power reactor facilities holding an operating license (OL) or construction permit (CP). Purpose: This notice provides additional information to licensees of hardware problems and deficient procurement controls and quality assurance (QA) practices on the part of suppliers of nuclear material that have been inspected by the IE Vendor Program Branch (VPB) since IE IN 84-52 was issued. It also is intended to call attention to generic problems in procurement activities on the part of licensees. No specific action is required in response to this information notice, but it is expected that recipients will review the information presented for applicability to their facilities. Discussion: Information Notice 84-52 described deficient procurement controls and QA practices identified during inspections performed by the VPB from 1982 to early 1984. Since that time, 13 additional inspections have been performed of material suppliers and material manufacturers. Deficiencies similar to those noted in IN 84-52 were found for all 13 vendors. Those deficiencies are described in Attachment 1. In addition to procurement and QA deficiencies, hardware deficiencies were noted for three of these vendors. IN 85-15, was issued on February 22, 1985, to specifically address the hardware deficiencies identified at one of the three vendors, Interstate Steel and Supply Company. The hardware deficiencies identified at the other two vendors, Phoenix Steel Corporation, Tube Division, and LTV Steel Company (formerly Jones and Laughlin Steel), Tubular Division, Campbell Plant, are discussed in this notice. The hardware deficiencies identified involved the production and shipment of seamless carbon steel pipe, portions of which did not meet the required minimum wall thickness because of inadequate manufacturing process controls and inadequate inspection methods. An NRC inspection of seamless pipe supplied by the two companies was recently performed at a nuclear power plant in which 20% of the LTV pipe and 40% of the Phoenix pipe inspected did not meet the minimum wall thickness requirements . IN 84-52, Supplement 1 May 8, 1985 Page 2 of 3 specified by the ASME Code. The worst case found during the inspection was a pipe which was 5.3% below the required minimum wall thickness along a portion of its length. However, because of the inadequate manufacturing process control and inadequate inspection methods by the two vendors, this cannot be assumed to be a limiting worst case. With the exception of the hardware deficiencies identified above, the issues listed in Attachment 1 are representative of findings made by the Vendor Program Branch during other inspections of quality programs and of the implementation of quality programs in the material supply and manufacturing industry. The number and nature of the findings suggest that significant problems may exist in the implementation of the nuclear industry's vendor evaluation and surveillance programs. The NRC's position is that the ultimate responsibility for the adequacy of these programs rests with the licensees. A contributing factor to the overall problem discussed above has been deficiencies identified with respect to licensee procurement and associated QA activities. Deficiencies of this type include: a. inadequate inspection of materials and components when received b. inadequate survey and auditing of vendor QA programs c. failure to perform adequate internal audits of the procurement process d. inadequate training of personnel who procure nuclear materials under the requirements of 10 CFR 21, Appendix B to 10 CFR 50, and the ASME Code e. insufficient management attention to procurement activities Attachment 1 lists vendors and recent VPB inspection reports where specific discrepancies have been identified regarding implementation of the vendors' quality assurance programs. These reports are published quarterly by the NRC in the "Licensee Contractor and Vendor Inspection Status Report," NUREG0040. Copies of this document (the White Book) may be obtained at a nominal cost from the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia 22161. Correspondence with contractors and vendors relative to the inspection data contained in NUREG-0040 is placed in the NRC Public Document Room, 1717 H Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20555. All of the vendors listed in Attachment 1 have submitted corrective action plans addressing the noted deficiencies. . IN 84-52, Supplement 1 May 8, 1985 Page 3 of 3 No specific action or written response is required by this information notice. If you have any questions regarding this notice, please contact the Regional Administrator of the appropriate NRC regional office or the technical contact listed below. Edward L. Jordan, Director Division of Emergency Preparedness and Engineering Response Office of Inspection and Enforcement Technical Contact: E. Baker, IE (301) 492-4874 Attachments: 1. Deficient Practices Identified in Recent VPB Inspections 2. List of Recently Issued Information Notices
Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021