Information Notice No. 82-14: TMI-1 Steam Generator/Reactor Coolant System Chemistry/Corrosion Problem
8202040133
SSINS No.: 6835
IN 82-14
UNITED STATES
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555
May 12, 1982
Information Notice No. 82-14: TMI-1 STEAM GENERATOR/REACTOR COOLANT
SYSTEM CHEMISTRY/CORROSION PROBLEM
Addressees:
All nuclear power reactor facilities holding an operating license (OL) or
construction permit (CP).
Purpose:
This information notice is provided as a notification of an event that may
have safety significance. It is expected that recipients will review the
information for applicability to their facilities. No specific action or
response is required at this time.
Description of Circumstances:
During a long-term cold shutdown, radioactivity was detected in the
secondary side of both steam generators at Three Mile Island (TMI), Unit 1.
Subsequent examinations and testing of the steam generators has revealed
corrosion damage to thousands of the steam generator tubes and primary to
secondary leakage at more than 100 tubes. Chemical analysis of the reactor
coolant revealed the presence (approaching 1 ppm) of sulfur compounds, which
in some reduced forms can cause rapid corrosion of some reactor coolant
system materials, including steam generator tubing. Although the exact cause
of the corrosion is still under investigation, preliminary indications are
that a sulfur compound was inadvertently introduced into the reactor coolant
system during the outage. Since this type of corrosion is particularly
aggressive, even during cold conditions, the licensee has deemed it
advisable to conduct an examination of reactor coolant materials throughout
the primary system.
Discussion:
Current pressurized water reactor plant standard technical specifications
require periodic sampling of the reactor coolant for chloride and fluoride
during cold shutdown or refueling. Typically, many PWRs also monitor pH and
conductivity under these conditions. This analysis indicates an impurity by
a mismatch between measured pH and conductivity when compared with predicted
pH and conductivity characteristic of the amount of boric acid and base
additive which is present. When any of the above conditions exist, it is
advisable to perform further analyses to determine what impurities are
present which will facilitate appropriate corrective measures.
.
IN 82-14
May 12, 1982
Page 2 of 2
In the case discussed above, chemistry data are still being reviewed, so it
cannot yet be concluded that the normal reactor coolant chemistry analyses
would have indicated the problem.
Four potential sources for sulfur introduction are being reviewed. These
include:
1. Inadvertent addition of sulfuric acid to the reactor coolant chemical
addition tank as a personnel error via the waste neutralization tank.
2. System or operator malfunction to introduce sodium thiosulfate (present
in tanks on site from past application as a containment spray
additive).
3. Release of ion exchange resins which have a sulfonic base, from letdown
or makeup systems.
4. Malfunction of the makeup system ion exchange regeneration process
which utilizes sulfuric acid.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact the Regional
Administrator of the appropriate NRC Regional Office, or this office.
Sincerely,
Edward L Jordan, Director
Division of Engineering and
Quality Assurance
Office of Inspection and Enforcement
Technical Contact: T. E. Chapman
301-492-4550
Attachment:
Recently issued IE Information Notices
Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021