Relaxation of Staff Position in Generic Letter 83-28, Item 2.2 Part 2 "Vendor Interface for Safety-Related Components" (Generic Letter 90-03)
March 20, 1990
TO: ALL POWER REACTOR LICENSEES AND APPLICANTS
SUBJECT: RELAXATION OF STAFF POSITION IN GENERIC LETTER 83-28, ITEM 2.2
PART 2 "VENDOR INTERFACE FOR SAFETY-RELATED COMPONENTS"
(GENERIC LETTER NO. 90-03)
This letter is to clarify the staff position in Part 2 of Item 2.2 of
Generic Letter 83-28 (Vendor Interface for Safety-Related Components).
The original position reads as follows:
"For vendor interface, licensees and applicants shall establish,
implement and maintain a continuing program to ensure that vendor
information for safety-related components is complete, current and
controlled throughout the life of their plants, and is appropriately
referenced or incorporated in plant instructions and procedures.
Vendors of safety-related equipment should be contacted and an
interface established. Where vendors cannot be identified, have gone
out of business, or will not supply information, the licensee or
applicant shall assure that sufficient attention is paid to equipment
maintenance, replacement, and repair, to compensate for the lack of
vendor backup, to assure reliability commensurate with its safety
function (GDC-1). The program shall be closely coupled with action
2.2.1 (equipment classification). The program shall include periodic
communication with vendors to assure that all applicable information
has been received. The program should use a system of positive
feedback with vendors for mailings containing technical information.
This could be accomplished by licensee acknowledgement for receipt of
technical mailings. It shall also define the interface and division of
responsibilities among the licensee and the nuclear and non-nuclear
divisions of their vendors that provide service on safety-related
equipment to assure that requisite control of and applicable
instructions for maintenance work on safety-related equipment are
provided."
Since this position was established, the industry has generally taken the
position that the Vendor Equipment Technical Information Program (VETIP)
described in the Nuclear Utility Task Action Committee (NUTAC) Report, INPO
84-010 issued in March 1984, meets the intent of Generic Letter 83-28, Item
2.2 Part 2. The VETIP program includes the Nuclear Plant Reliability Data
System (NPRDS) and the Significant Event Evaluation and Information Network
(SEE-IN), both managed by INPO. It also includes existing programs the
utilities now conduct with vendors. In particular, it includes interaction
with the NSSS vendor.
9003140089
.
- 2 -
The staff has reviewed the VETIP program and has had the benefit of
considerable discussions with licensees regarding vendor interface. It is
now recognized that implementing a formal vendor interface program for every
safety-related component is not practical. It is also recognized that
vendors may not always be in the best position to analyze a failure because
they may not be aware of the components' application, environment or
maintenance history. Therefore, we conclude that the elements of VETIP
provide a framework to improve the quality and availability of equipment
technical information for use by utility licensees.
Experience has shown that many vendors, in addition to NSSS vendors, do
produce valuable information relating to their equipment. For this reason,
the staff concludes that an adequate vendor interface program should
include:
(a) A program with the NSSS vendor as described in the VETIP, which
covers all the safety-related components within the NSSS scope of
supply. This program should include provisions for assuring
receipt by the licensee/applicant of all technical information
provided by the NSSS vendor; and
(b) A program of periodic contact with the vendors of other key
safety-related components not included in (a) above.
The vendor interface program should also take into account the requirements
of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B which requires the licensee or applicant to be
responsible for establishing and executing the quality assurance program.
It states that the licensee or applicant may delegate to others the work of
establishing and executing the quality assurance program or any part of it,
but the licensee or applicant shall retain responsibility for the program.
Therefore, the licensee or applicant should have a program which assures
that procedures and instructions are properly prepared and implemented and
that quality assurance programs for design, maintenance or modification work
performed on safety-related equipment by outside vendors or contractors are
properly implemented. These programs should clearly establish and delineate
in writing the authority and duties of persons and organizations performing
activities affecting this safety-related equipment.
The programs in (a) above should provide for the licensee or applicant to
receive all updates to instruction and maintenance manuals, technical
information bulletins, revised test procedures, and updated replacement
parts information. The programs should include provisions which ensure the
licensee receives all such vendor issued information pertinent to its
safety-related equipment.
The program described in (b) above is not intended to be as extensive as the
program in (a), but is intended to be a good faith, documented effort to
periodically contact the vendors of key, safety-related components (such as
auxiliary feedwater pumps, batteries, inverters, battery chargers, cooling
water pumps, and valve operators), not already included in the interface
program of (a) above, to obtain any technical information applicable to this
.
- 3 -
equipment. Documented periodic contact via telephone is sufficient. It is
expected that a reasonable and prudent review of operating experience,
availability of vendor information, and component safety significance using
insights obtained from generic or plant specific probabilistic risk analyses
will yield a set of component vendors that will make up each licensee's
program. In the event that vendors have gone out of business, cannot be
identified, or will not supply information, the licensee or applicant should
implement or continue to maintain a program that will assure that sufficient
attention is paid to equipment maintenance, replacement, and repair to
compensate for the lack of vendor backup such that equipment reliability
commensurate with its safety function is assured.
Licensees and applicants are requested to review their present vendor
interface programs and modify their programs as necessary to assure that
both of the elements set out above are met. Pursuant to Section 182 of the
Atomic Energy Act and 10 CFR 50.54(f), the NRC requires that licensees
report to the NRC within 180 days of receipt of this generic letter whether
or not they have taken the actions requested.
Licensees undertaking the actions requested should confirm that they have
examined their vendor interface programs, that their programs either already
include both of the elements set out in this letter or that the elements
have been scheduled for implementation. If licensee actions are not
complete at the time of their submittal, the licensee should submit a
completion date for the remaining actions to be taken. If the licensee
declines to undertake the actions requested by this letter, the licensee is
required to provide justification for the position.
The response to this letter is to be provided under oath or affirmation and
is necessary to enable the Commission to determine whether or not your
license should be modified, suspended, or revoked. The response shall be
addressed to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control
Desk, Washington, D. C. 20555. The NRC will continue to monitor the
effectiveness of licensee or applicant vendor interface program
implementation through the inspection process and will use the responses to
this letter to plan and locate resources for inspections. Where a
licensee's failure to (1) obtain information from vendors, (2) evaluate
information obtained from vendors, or (3) implement necessary actions based
on information obtained from a vendor results in conditions adverse to
quality, the NRC will make findings and take action in accordance with its
regulations.
This request is covered by the Office of Management and Budget Clearance
Number 3150-0011, which expires January 31, 1991. The estimated average
burden hours is 320 person hours per licensee response (144 person hours per
year per licensee thereafter), including assessment of the new
recommendations, searching data sources, gathering and analyzing the data,
and preparing the required letters. Send comments regarding this burden
estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including
suggestions for reducing this burden, to the Records and Reports Management
Branch, (MNBB-7714) Division of Information Support Services, Office of
Information Resources Management, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, D. C. 20555; and to the Paperwork Reduction Project (3150-0011),
Office of Management and Budget, Washington, D. C. 20503.
.
- 4 -
Backfit Discussion
The actions described in this generic letter are relaxations of the original
position taken in Generic Letter 83-28 and are not considered a backfit in
accordance with NRC procedures. An evaluation of this letter was performed
in accordance with the charter of the Committee to Review Generic
Requirements (CRGR) and will be made available in the public document room
with the minutes of the 178th meeting of the CRGR.
If you have any questions about this matter, please contact the NRC project
manager or the technical contact listed below.
Sincerely,
James G. Partlow
Associate Director for Projects
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Enclosure:
Listing of Recently Issued Generic Letters
Technical Contacts:
S. Newberry, NRR
(301) 492-0782
D. LaBarge, NRR
(301) 492-1421
.ENDEND
Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021