Report a Safety Concern
Search

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission is in the process of rescinding or revising guidance and policies posted on this webpage in accordance with Executive Order 14151 Ending Radical and Wasteful Government DEI Programs and Preferencing, and Executive Order 14168 Defending Women From Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government. In the interim, any previously issued diversity, equity, inclusion, or gender-related guidance on this webpage should be considered rescinded that is inconsistent with these Executive Orders.

Home NRC Library Document Collections NUREG-Series Publications Publications Resulting from International Agreements

Assessment of Interphase Drag Correlations in the RELAP5/MOD2 and TRAC-PF1/MOD2 Codes (NUREG/IA-0015)

On this page:

Download complete document

Publication Information

Date Published: July 1989

Prepared by:
K.H. Ardron, A.J. Clare

Central Electricity Generating Board
Barnwood, Gloucester
GL4 7RS
United Kingdom

Prepared as part of:
The Agreement on Research Participation and Technical Exchange
under the International Thermal-Hydraulic Code Assessment
and Application Program (ICAP)

Published by:
Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Washington, DC 20555

Availability Notice

Abstract

An assessment is carried out of the interphase drag correlations used in modelling vertical two-phase flows in the advanced thermalhydraulic codes RELAN5/Mod2 and TRAC-MFI/Modl. The assessment is performed by using code models to calculate void fraction in fully developed steam-water flows, and comparing results wi:h predictions of standard correlations and test data. The study is restricted to the bubbly and slug flow regimes (void fractions below 0.75).

For upflows, at pressures of interest in PWR small break LOCA and transient analysis the performance of She code models is generally satisfactory. E:ccepcions are (i) small hydraulic diameter channels at low pressure (p ≤ 4 MPa) (ii) large pipe diameters at void fractions exceeding 0.5; in these cases void fraction errors are cuCsLde normal uncertainty ranges.

For downflows, the code models give good agreement with limited available void fraction data.

The numerical results given in this paper allow a rapid estimate co be made of void fraction errors likely to arise in a particular code application due to deficiencies in interphase drag modelling.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021