Information Notice No. 91-47: Failure of THERMO-LAG Fire Barrier Material to pass Fire Endurance Test
UNITED STATES
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555
August 6, 1991
Information Notice No. 91-47: FAILURE OF THERMO-LAG FIRE BARRIER
MATERIAL TO PASS FIRE ENDURANCE TEST
Addressees:
All holders of operating licenses or construction permits for nuclear power
reactors.
Purpose:
This information notice is intended to alert addressees to problems that
could result from the use of or improper installation of THERMO-LAG material
to satisfy the electrical raceway fire protection requirements for safe
shutdown components specified in Section III.G.2 of Appendix R to Part 50 of
Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR Part 50). It is
expected that recipients will review the information for applicability to
their facilities and consider actions, as appropriate, to avoid similar
problems. However, suggestions contained in this information notice do not
constitute any new Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) requirements;
therefore, no specific action or written response is required.
Description of Circumstances:
The Gulf States Utilities Company, the licensee for the River Bend Station
(RBS), submitted Licensee Event Reports (LERs) 87-005, 89-009, 90-003, and
an Informational Report to the NRC concerning deficiencies identified in
fire barriers. The NRC staff reviewed test report information and
associated documents regarding the RBS electrical raceway fire barriers to
determine if the problems identified in the LERs and Informational Report
could affect other NRC licensees. The electrical raceway fire barrier
material used at RBS is THERMO-LAG, a product manufactured and supplied by
Thermal Science, Incorporated, (TSI), of St. Louis, Missouri. TSI provides
THERMO-LAG for 1-hour and 3-hour rated fire barriers.
A 3-hour fire endurance test of a 30-inch aluminum electrical cable tray was
performed in October 1989 at the Southwest Research Institute (SwRI) for
Gulf States Utilities Company. In this test, a THERMO-LAG envelope system
failed resulting in high temperatures inside the cable tray envelope and
loss of circuit integrity within approximately 60 minutes. Catastrophic
failure and collapse of the tray occurred within 1 1/2 hours. The failure
of this test raised concerns regarding the adequacy of THERMO-LAG cable tray
enclosures protecting 30-inch wide cable trays.
9108020180
.
IN 91-47
August 6, 1991
Page 2 of 4
Discussion:
NRC requirements and guidelines for fire barriers are contained in various
documents, including Appendix R to 10 CFR 50, Generic Letter 86-10,
"Implementation of Fire Protection Requirements", and NUREG-0800, "Standard
Review Plan." The extent to which these requirements or guidelines are
applicable to a specific plant depends on plant age, commitments established
by the licensee in developing the fire protection plan, the staff safety
evaluation reports (SERs) and supplements, and the license conditions
pertaining to fire protection. Fire barrier wrap material is designed to
provide reasonable assurance that the effects of a fire are limited to one
division of a safe shutdown related system while another division will
remain free of fire damage.
The Gulf States Utilities Company uses THERMO-LAG to protect raceways and
components throughout RBS that are related to safe shutdown. In addition,
at least 40 NRC licensed facilities use THERMO-LAG to construct fire barrier
assemblies with 3-hour and 1-hour ratings to enclose electrical raceway and
other safe shutdown components.
During routine walkdown inspections in early 1987, RBS fire protection
personnel identified degradation of the THERMO-LAG 1-hour and 3-hour rated
barriers. During repairs to correct the deficiencies discovered during the
walkdowns, the licensee found that the fire barriers had not been installed
in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. The large number of
observed deficiencies prompted the licensee to expand these walkdown
inspections to include all THERMO-LAG fire barriers. Hourly fire watches
were posted in all affected safety-related areas pending completion of all
inspections and correction of any deficiencies found. The licensee
attributed the deficiencies to failure of the subcontractor installation and
quality control inspection program.
During maintenance activities in early 1989, the licensee found additional
deficiencies indicating an apparent deficiency in the installation and
quality control inspection program. The subcontractor who installed the
THERMO-LAG fire barriers at RBS was approved by TSI as a qualified
installer. However, during the installation at RBS, the subcontractor
removed the factory-installed components of the THERMO-LAG called "stress
skin" and structural ribbing. The stress skin component, a wire mesh, is
critical to the structural integrity of the fire product during fire
exposure. The RBS fire protection personnel considered that all barriers
were degraded because of the many sections of the inside layer of the stress
skin that had been removed during initial installation at RBS.
The discrepancies identified between the manufacturer's installation manual,
actual site installation manual and qualification fire tests resulted in the
licensee conducting additional fire endurance testing. In October 1989,
SwRI tested a U-shaped 30-inch wide aluminum ladder back cable tray enclosed
in a 3-hour fire-rated barrier constructed of THERMO-LAG material. RBS
personnel constructed the cable tray protective envelope in accordance with
the manufacturer's published installation instructions.
.
IN 91-47
August 6, 1991
Page 3 of 4
During the 3-hour fire endurance test, all thermocouples inside the
THERMO-LAG protected tray reached failure temperatures (>325�F) in times
ranging from approximately 45 minutes to 80 minutes. Conductor-to-ground
failure occurred in the power cable at 60 minutes. The THERMO-LAG enclosure
disintegrated at 77 minutes, and the cable tray collapsed at 82 minutes.
The SwRI test results on the as-designed THERMO-LAG configuration prompted
RBS to institute a fire watch patrol in all areas that depend on THERMO-LAG
barriers for protection of safe shutdown capability.
Additional deficiencies, such as small holes, cracks and unfilled seams,
were found in the THERMO-LAG material during walkdowns conducted in early
1990. The licensee conducted additional testing of as-installed barriers in
November and December 1990. Certain 1-hour and 3-hour cable tray and
conduit envelope tests failed. The envelopes were upgraded and tests of the
upgraded barriers passed with the exception of the 3-hour cable tray
envelope. Final resolution of the 3-hour envelope may include replacing
existing fire wrap materials with fully qualified fire wrap, repairing and
then qualifying in-plant fire wrap assemblies by supplemental fire tests, or
rerouting the cables into acceptable enclosures.
Additionally, other fire barrier wrap design and installation concerns have
been reported by RBS that indicate the possibility that NRC requirements for
fire protection were not being met in all aspects. The type of concerns
identified to date include the following:
1. Lack of documentation of qualification tests which demonstrate that
aluminum conduits penetrating the THERMO-LAG protective envelope have
been tested.
2. Lack of documentation of qualification tests for different joint
installations that demonstrate that varying fitup methods (i.e., dry
fitting) are qualified.
3. Lack of documentation of qualification tests of THERMO-LAG
installations applicable to large cable trays. The licensee questioned
the validity of extrapolating results from small cable tray tests to
its 30-inch wide trays.
The NRC is particularly interested in obtaining information on fire barriers
that have been found with deficiencies similar to those described in this
notice. Documentation, in as much detail as practicable, of any such
deficiencies discovered, especially in cases where a fire barrier may have
been improperly installed or tested is important. Licensees may communicate
the availability of information of this type by telephone to the NRC
technical contact listed below. Information Notice No. 88-04, "Inadequate
Qualification and Documentation of Fire Barrier Penetration Seals," provides
additional discussion and considerations regarding qualification of
installed fire barriers.
.
IN 91-47
August 6, 1991
Page 4 of 4
This information notice requires no specific action or written response. If
you have any questions about the information in this notice, please contact
the technical contact listed below or the appropriate Office of Nuclear
Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.
Charles E. Rossi, Director
Division of Operational Events Assessment
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Technical Contact: Ralph Architzel, NRR
301-492-0804
Attachment: List of Recently Issued NRC Information Notices
.
Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021