Information Notice No. 81-11: Alternate Rod Insertion for BWR Scram Represents a Potential Path for Loss of Primary Coolant
SSINS No.: 6835
Accession No.:
8011040266
IN 81-11
UNITED STATES
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555
March 30, 1981
Information Notice No. 81-11: ALTERNATE ROD INSERTION FOR BWR SCRAM
REPRESENTS A POTENTIAL PATH FOR LOSS OF
PRIMARY COOLANT
Description of Circumstances:
During an engineering evaluation of the scram discharge air system in
response to recently issued NRC requirements, the Boston Edison Company
identified a potential path for loss of primary coolant at its Pilgrim
Nuclear Power Station. The licensee found that the installed location of an
anticipated transient without scram (ATWS) alternate rod insertion (ARI)
solenoid valve could cause insertion of control rods without an associated
closure of the scram discharge volume vent and drain valves. The loss of
coolant could then follow an ARI actuation through the open vent and drain
valves to the reactor building equipment drain tank and then to the reactor
building sump. The rate of coolant loss through the inserted drives could be
approximately 500 gpm (based on 3 to 4 gpm per drive for 145 control rod
drives) that would be released by the open vent and drain valves. This loss
rate is well within the 4250 gpm capability of the high pressure coolant
injection (HPCI) system. However, the 400 gpm capability of the reactor core
isolation cooling (RCIC) system would need the 100 gpm of the CRD pumps to
maintain level.
The alternate rod insertion installation was completed at the Pilgrim BWR
during the refueling outage ending in May 1980. The installation was
intended to permit dumping the air header supplying the scram valves. This
function is similar to that provided by the backup scram valves, and it
provides a means for inserting the control rods in the event of an ATWS that
includes failure of the reactor protection system. The testing of the ARI
installation at Pilgrim apparently failed to confirm vent and drain valve
function.
Following identification of the potential path for loss of primary coolant,
the licensee reviewed plant procedures to assure that until system
modifications could be completed, immediate operator actions during an ATWS
event would include closing the scram discharge vent and drain valves. It is
noted that instrumentation installed in the scram discharge header in
response to Bulletin 80-17 and the instrumented volume level switches should
alert the reactor operator to the presence of reactor coolant following ARI
actuation.
The licensee modified the system during a scheduled outage in February, 1981
to cause the scram discharge volume vent and drain valves to close in the
event of ARI actuation.
.
IN 81-11
March 30, 1981
Page 2 of 2
Discussion with General Electric indicates that they plan to provide
pertinent information to operating BWR licensees regarding the described
potential path for loss of primary coolant.
This information is provided as a notification of a possibly significant
matter which is still under review by the NRC staff. In case the continuing
NRC review finds that specific licensee actions would be appropriate, an IE
bulletin or circular may be issued. In the interim, we expect that BWR
licensees will review this information for applicability to their
facilities. Licensee testing of the ARI installation should also be
reexamined to confirm that vent and drain valves close as a direct result of
ARI actuation.
No written response to this information notice is required. If you need
additional information regarding this matter, please contact the Director of
the appropriate NRC Regional Office.
Attachment:
Recently issued IE Information Notices
Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021