Part 21 Report - 1997-072

ACCESSION #: 9704080133 Victoreen, Inc. April 1, 1997 VICTOREEN U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Center Washington, DC 20555 Reference: 10CFR21 Report of Noncompliance dated January 30, 1997 Model 960 RDU Fixed Display and Outputs Subject: Corrective Action and Close-out, 10CFR21 Report of Noncompliance Model 960 RDU Fixed Display and Outputs Gentlemen: Further to our notification dated January 30, 1997, this letter has been prepared to provide formal notification of the corrective action performed, and to close-out the subject 10CFR21 Report of Noncompliance. General Description: For Safety-Related applications, the Model 960 microprocessor based digital radiation monitoring system (DRMS) consists of a local radiation processor (LCU or LRP) and a remote, control room located, display and control unit (RDU or SRD). In this design, the LCU is configured as a "master," stand alone, radiation input processor. The RDU operates as a "slave" control and indication device, driven by the LCU. The LCU communicates with the RDU via a dedicated serial communication link. The design also supports interface with a supervisory computer, electrically isolated from the Safety Related components via a fiber optic isolation system. The subject Report of Noncompliance identifies the potential for the microprocessor in the RDU to "lock up." In this mode, the RDU will not respond to status and value information transmitted from the LCU. That is, the RDU digital display and analog outputs will stop updating, and the RDU alarm relays will not change state to indicate a radiation alarm or monitor fail condition. Note that this notification does not apply to the digital display, analog output and relay contact outputs originating directly from the LCU. Only the display, analog and relay outputs originating from the RDU are affected. 6000 Cochran Road Cleveland, Ohio 44139-3395 (216) 248-9300 FAX (216) 248-9301 810-421-8287 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission April 1, 1997 -- Page 2 of 4 Pages Victoreen Corrective Action: 1. The PG&E RDU hardware was simulated in out test department. The event described has been replicated, identifying the potential for a "lock up" to occur. Further analysis of the RDU operation has identified that a momentary loss of AC power may result in a "lock up." This was simulated by rapidly toggling the AC power switch on and off. By rapidly cycling the AC power switch, a "lock up" condition was produced approximately one (1) out of ten (10) times. 2. To correct the problem, Victoreen has implemented the following modifications to the test RDU: - Design Change Request No. 3CR47-97 was issued to revise the RDU operating firmware to include a WRITE operation to the analog output module at the end of each microprocessor cycle. The WRITE operation is used to reset a Watchdog counter circuit. - A Watchdog counter circuit has been added to the RDU. The Watchdog counter has been designed to time out in three (3) seconds and output a pulse to reset the microprocessor. Receipt of the analog output WRITE operation will reset the counter and permit normal operation to continue. - An AC power sense circuit has been added to the RDU. The circuit monitors the AC line voltage, and outputs a PWRFL pulse if the AC line voltage drops below a nominal 90 v AC. The PWRFL pulse will hold the microprocessor in a RESET state until the AC line voltage returns to normal. This action prevents operation of the microprocessor under low Vcc conditions, where the validity of the memory addressing operations may be questionable, and the potential for a "lock up" condition exists. - Job Request No. 3JR7-97 was issued to implement the above functions, resulting in the design of the Model 960WD-200 Watchdog timer and AC voltage sense module. The design of the circuitry is based on similar circuitry that has been shown to be effective in preventing "lock ups" in the LCU. This module, along with the change to the RDU operating firmware, has been shown to effectively prevent "lock ups" on our test RDU. U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission April 1, 1997 -- Page 3 of 4 Pages - The operation of the microprocessor controlled isolator was also evaluated. Although a Watchdog circuit and voltage monitor are not included in the design of the isolator, a "lock up" of this microprocessor will result in the display of a Communications Fail message on the computer console. Because the computer system is not considered Safety Related, and is isolated from the LCU or RDU via a fiber optic isolation system, additional protection is not required to ensure the integrity of the Safety Related portion of the monitor. Customer Action: 1. Attachment A lists users of the Model 960 DRMS that are known to initiate ESFAS operations from the RDU. In the close-out letter for these applications, an upgrade to add the 960WD-200 module to the RDU hardware, will be made available. Design upgrade packages to provide "lock up" protection for Safety-Related monitors will be available within 90 days from the date of this letter. Installation will be based upon the schedule established by the user. 2. Attachment B lists users of the Model 960 DRMS that DO NOT use the RDU to generate Safety-Related ESFAS actions. These users will be formally notified of the potential for the RDU to "lock up". For these users, the "lock up" condition will be readily evident to the operator via the lack of the normal statistical fluctuation of the digital display. Verification of the current radiation value may be obtained from the LCU or, when supplied, from the supervisory computer system. Because the frequency of occurrence is small, Safety-Related control functions are not affected, and a method of detecting a "lock up" exists, the close out letter to these users states that an upgrade to the existing design is not considered mandatory. Users will be further advised that operation of the RDU may be verified by periodically actuating the monitor Check Source. U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission April 1, 1997 -- Page 4 of 4 Pages Root Cause Analysis: From our review of the original design of the Model 960 system, the master/slave relationship between the LCU and RDU assumed ESFAS interlocks would be obtained from relays located in the LCU, and incorporation of a Watchdog timer or an AC power sense circuit in the RDU was not warranted. The Nonmaskable interrupt was used to recover from a transient by forcing the processor to restart its mail loop every 0.25 seconds. This concept was substantiated by the successful operation of the installed RDUs for over 12 years (e.g. from 1984 through 1997). In addition, the original system design for PG&E included a serial interface to a supervisory computer. Although the computer system has not been installed, this interface, which was to be routed through the RDU, included a communications fail routine that was designed to provide a fail message on the supervisory computer console. Because of the successful operation in the past, the need for additional microprocessor protection was not considered when the system design, to include ESFAS outputs actuated from the RDU, was implemented. The root cause, therefore, was basing the design on prior operating experience, and not requiring the performance of a test to verify operation during short term supply voltage transients. We thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Please advise if you have any questions or comments of the information provided here-in. Best Regards, Andrew W. Lasko Technical Support Manager Linda S. Nash, Corporate Director, Regulatory Affairs and Quality Assurance Attachment A 960 Monitor Installations, Safety Related RDU ESFAS Outputs Mandatory Upgrade Required Customer/Plant: Type: Ship Sales Control Date: Order: Outputs: PG&E/Diablo Canyon 1, 2 IIA 91/93 35554 RDU RDU = Control Outputs available at RDU Attachment B 960 Monitor Installations, No Safety Related ESFAS Outputs at RDU Upgrade NOT Required, - Notification Only Customer/Plant: Type: Ship Sales Control Date: Order: Outputs: Bechtel/KEPCO/KORI 3, 4 I 83/85 260032 LCU Bechtel/KEPCO/Yonggwang 1, 2 I 84/86 370001 LCU Tractebel/Tihange 1 I 85/86 49021 N/A Tractebel/Tihange 2 I 85 69014 N/A Electrobel/Tihange 3 I 85 89036 N/A PSE&G/Salem 2 I 86 860020 LCU PSE&G/Salem 2 I 86 780018 LCU Con Edison/Indian Point 2 II 86/87 830023 LCU Con Edison/Indian Point 2 II 87/90 190004 LCU GPU/TMI 1 II 87 960024 LCU KEPCO/KORI 1, 2 IIA 92 36726 LCU Proray/Jose Cabrerra IIA 93 55885 N/S KEPCO/KORI 1, 2; Wolsung 1 IIA 93 58047 LCU Electrobel/Tihange 3 IIA 96 71320 N/A LCU = Control Outputs available at LCU N/A = RDU configured as LCU N/S = Not Supplied *** END OF DOCUMENT ***

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021