Report a Safety Concern
Search

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission is in the process of rescinding or revising guidance and policies posted on this webpage in accordance with Executive Order 14151 Ending Radical and Wasteful Government DEI Programs and Preferencing, and Executive Order 14168 Defending Women From Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government. In the interim, any previously issued diversity, equity, inclusion, or gender-related guidance on this webpage should be considered rescinded that is inconsistent with these Executive Orders.

Home NRC Library Document Collections NUREG-Series Publications Publications Prepared by NRC Contractors

Fracture Toughness Testing With Cracked Round Bars: Feasibility Study (NUREG/CR-6342)

On this page:

Download complete document

Publication Information

Manuscript Completed: March 2000
Date Published: April 2000

Prepared by:
J.H. Giovanola, J.E. Crocker

SRI International Poulter Laboratory
333 Ravenswood Avenue
Menlo Park, CA 94025

Under Contract to:
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Managed by Lockheed Martin Energy Research Corporation
Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6158

C.J. Fairbanks, NRC Project Manager

Prepared for:
Division of Engineering Technology
Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Washington, DC 20555-0001

NRC Job Code L1098

Availability Notice

Abstract

SRI International has investigated the feasibility of measuring representative toughness values for nuclear pressure vessel materials using small cracked round bars (CRBs). We tested a weldment material [Heavy-Section Steel Irradiation (HSSI) Weld 72W with 0.23% copper] at six temperatures (-150°, -80°, -50°, 0°, 23°, and 50°C) using CRBs and compared the fracture-toughness results with data obtained for HSSI Weld 72W by Oak Ridge National Laboratory using 1T-compact tension (CT) specimens.

The overall agreement between the toughness values measured with the CRBs and the 1T-CT was quite good over the entire range of temperatures and for both cleavage and ductile fracture. This agreement attests to the promise of the CRB geometry for providing valid toughness values from small specimens. Nevertheless, we observed some differences, mainly for cleavage toughness values below 0° C. We attribute the differences to (1) possible inaccuracies in the estimation formulas for the J-integral, (2) differences in constraint, and (3) statistical size effects.

We recommend that work be continued to validate the CRB test procedure and to adapt it to specimens that can be fabricated from halves of broken Charpy specimens.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021