The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission is in the process of rescinding or revising guidance and policies posted on this webpage in accordance with Executive Order 14151 Ending Radical and Wasteful Government DEI Programs and Preferencing, and Executive Order 14168 Defending Women From Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government. In the interim, any previously issued diversity, equity, inclusion, or gender-related guidance on this webpage should be considered rescinded that is inconsistent with these Executive Orders.

Part 21 Report - 1996-341

ACCESSION #: 9605070306 Illinois Power Company Clinton Power Station P. O. Box 678 Tel 217 935-5623 Fax 217 935-4632 Wilfred Connell Vice President ILLINOIS POWER U-602579 4F.140 WC-145-96 May 2, 1996 Docket No. 50-461 10CFR21.21 Document Control Desk Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Subject: 10CFR21 Final Report 21-96-001: Ideal Generators Installed with Emergency Diesel Generators Have Generator Rotor Mass Greater Than Originally Calculated Dear Sir: On January 15, 1996, Illinois Power (IP) identified a condition involving the Divisions 1 and 2 Emergency Diesel Generators (EDGs) as potentially reportable under the provisions of 10CFR21. Specifically, Condition Report (CR) 1-96-01-029 was initiated to identify that Ideal Electric, the manufacturer of the generator portion of the EDGs, had discovered that the mass of the generator rotors had been incorrectly calculated. The revised calculation shows a larger rotor mass and rotational inertia. IP purchased the EDG units from Stewart & Stevenson. The generators are Ideal model numbers SA6-50 and SA6-44, and Ideal drawings B-MED-221 and B-MED-217. On March 13, 1996, IP submitted an interim report (IP letter U- 602564) to inform the NRC that the reportability evaluation for the condition was not complete. In that report, IP noted that an evaluation of the impact of the condition on the seismic qualification of the diesel generator units was complete and concluded that the larger rotor mass has no adverse impact on the units. The interim report further noted that IP had not completed an evaluation of the impact of the larger rotor mass on the frequency and torsional analysis of the units. Prior to the interim report, a preliminary review of the impact of this issue on generator frequency and torsional vibration had been performed and additional evaluation was to follow. The preliminary review had found the condition acceptable. IP has completed an evaluation of the impact of this condition on the frequency and torsional analysis of the units and concludes that the larger rotor mass does not have an adverse impact on the ability of the Divisions 1 and 2 EDGs to perform their intended design function. Therefore, on the basis that this condition could not create a substantial safety hazard, it is not reportable under the provisions of 10CFR21. U-602579 Page 2 Additional information regarding this issue may be obtained by contacting S. P. Hong, Plant Engineering, at (217) 935-8881, extension 3464. Sincerely yours, Wilf Connell Vice President RSF/csm cc: NRC Clinton Licensing Project Manager NRC Resident Office, V-690 Regional Administrator, Region III, USNRC Illinois Department of Nuclear Safety INPO Records Center Ideal Electric Stewart & Stevenson *** END OF DOCUMENT ***

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021