Part 21 Report - 1995-065
.
REGION IV MORNING REPORT PAGE 2 MARCH 13, 1995
Licensee/Facility: Notification:
Wolf Creek Nuclear Oper. Corp. MR Number: 4-95-0030
Wolf Creek 1 Date: 03/13/95
Burlington,Kansas RESIDENT INSPECTOR
Dockets: 50-482
PWR/W-4-LP
Subject: REACTOR TRIP RECOVERY AND ESTIMATED CRITICAL POSITION
ANOMALY
Reportable Event Number: 28504
Discussion:
Following a reactor trip during the performance of reactor trip breaker
testing on March 8, the licensee completed several corrective actions in
preparation for reactor startup. The reactor trip was caused when a
reactor trip breaker was being closed from the control room using the
reactor trip switch. The switch failed to maintain circuit continuity
and resulted in a reactor trip. Non-vital bus PA-01 failed to fast
transfer and two reactor coolant trips were deenergized as a result.
Corrective actions completed prior to restart included procedure changes
to prohibit use of the reactor trip switch in the control room to close
the reactor trip breakers if all rods were not fully inserted and
preventive maintenance on the PA-01 breakers to improve breaker actuation
time.
During the reactor startup on March 12, the reactor was made critical at
10:36 a.m. (CST). Criticality was achieved at 56 steps on Control Bank C
and the estimated critical position had predicted criticality at 72 steps
on Bank D, a difference of approximately 1000 pcm. The licensee had been
plotting a 1/m graph and observed that the reactor would achieve
criticality earlier than predicted by the ECP. Following criticality and
stabilization, the licensee decided to insert all control bank control
rods while evaluation of the anomaly was in progress. Licensee
procedures call for an evaluation if criticality is achieved more than
500 pcm different than the ECP. The licensee determined that the error
was due to a reactivity bias in the Babcock and Wilcox software program
that calculates ECPs and various other core performance related
functions. Insertion of the same precritical data into a previously used
program from a different vendor predicted criticality at a position that
was only 21 pcm different from the actual critical position. Following
the evaluation, and based on information from previous physics testing
and core response, the licensee commenced a reactor startup utilizing the
previously used ECP program, and was critical at 6:02 a.m. (CST) on
March 13.
Regional Action:
The Resident Inspectors and Region IV personnel will be following the
licensee's actions and will review the corrective actions during routine
inspection followup activities.
Contact: D. N. Graves (817)860-8141
J. Dixon-Herrity (316)364-8653
Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021