The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission is in the process of rescinding or revising guidance and policies posted on this webpage in accordance with Executive Order 14151 Ending Radical and Wasteful Government DEI Programs and Preferencing, and Executive Order 14168 Defending Women From Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government. In the interim, any previously issued diversity, equity, inclusion, or gender-related guidance on this webpage should be considered rescinded that is inconsistent with these Executive Orders.

Event Notification Report for June 5, 2003




                    U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

                              Operations Center



                              Event Reports For

                           06/04/2003 - 06/05/2003



                              ** EVENT NUMBERS **



39903  



+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+

|Power Reactor                                    |Event Number:   39903       |

+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+

+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+

| FACILITY: OCONEE                   REGION:  2  |NOTIFICATION DATE: 06/04/2003|

|    UNIT:  [1] [2] [3]               STATE:  SC |NOTIFICATION TIME: 19:03[EDT]|

|   RXTYPE: [1] B&W-L-LP,[2] B&W-L-LP,[3] B&W-L-L|EVENT DATE:        06/04/2003|

+------------------------------------------------+EVENT TIME:        11:15[EDT]|

| NRC NOTIFIED BY:  RANDY TODD                   |LAST UPDATE DATE:  06/04/2003|

|  HQ OPS OFFICER:  JOHN MacKINNON               +-----------------------------+

+------------------------------------------------+PERSON          ORGANIZATION |

|EMERGENCY CLASS:          NON EMERGENCY         |KERRY LANDIS         R2      |

|10 CFR SECTION:                                 |                             |

|AUNA 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B)  UNANALYZED CONDITION   |                             |

|                                                |                             |

|                                                |                             |

|                                                |                             |

+-----+----------+-------+--------+-----------------+--------+-----------------+

|UNIT |SCRAM CODE|RX CRIT|INIT PWR|   INIT RX MODE  |CURR PWR|  CURR RX MODE   |

+-----+----------+-------+--------+-----------------+--------+-----------------+

|1     N          Y       100      Power Operation  |100      Power Operation  |

|2     N          Y       100      Power Operation  |100      Power Operation  |

|3     N          N       0        Cold Shutdown    |0        Cold Shutdown    |

+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+

                                   EVENT TEXT                                   

+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+

| APPENDIX R  ISSUE                                                            |

|                                                                              |

| During an Appendix R design basis review, an Engineer noted that cables      |

| associated with normal operation of components used for one train (Primary   |

| Isolation valves) of Appendix R mitigation were routed through an adjacent   |

| fire zone associated with the other train of Appendix R mitigation.  During  |

| an Appendix R event, control of the affected components is transferred to    |

| the Standby Shutdown Facility, which electrically isolates the subject       |

| cables.                                                                      |

|                                                                              |

| However, the area containing the subject cables does not have fire detection |

| equipment.  The Engineer noted that if a fire occurred and damaged the       |

| cables, it would be theoretically possible for a "smart short" to result in  |

| damage to equipment before action could be taken to transfer control to the  |

| Standby Shutdown Facility.                                                   |

|                                                                              |

|                                                                              |

| Initial Safety Significance:                                                 |

|                                                                              |

| This condition is similar to an example given in NUREG 1022, Section 3.2.4   |

| (fire barrier missing such that the required degree of separation for        |

| redundant safe shutdown trains is lacking).                                  |

|                                                                              |

| In order to result in a loss of safety function, the postulated fire would   |

| have to damage the cable, result in a smart spurious actuation of a          |

| component, damage that component such that it became inoperable (such as by  |

| burning out the motor of a valve), then also spread within the fire zone to  |

| damage the redundant component (for example by burning the power cable or    |

| motor control center).                                                       |

|                                                                              |

| The Oconee license basis is no spurious circuit operations for 10 minutes.   |

| Cable testing sponsored by the NRC, NEI, and EPRI for fire exposure has      |

| demonstrated that armored type cable construction used in this application   |

| is more rugged than other designs and that internal cable failure times      |

| usually extend beyond 30 minutes.                                            |

|                                                                              |

| The area containing the cables is a high traffic area for both personnel and |

| material - including low quantities of transient combustibles, but has no    |

| appreciable fixed fire loads.  Thus the probability of a fire of sufficient  |

| energy to damage the cable is low.  Pending a PRA analysis, it appears       |

| reasonable to credit prompt discovery of a fire and initiation of action to  |

| suppress the fire and/or transfer of control to the Standby Shutdown         |

| Facility prior to cable damage.  Therefore the overall risk impact of this   |

| event is currently considered low.                                           |

|                                                                              |

|                                                                              |

| Corrective Action:                                                           |

|                                                                              |

| The SSF has been declared inoperable pending establishment of a fire watch.  |

|                                                                              |

| The NRC Resident Inspector will be informed of this event by the licensee.   |

+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+



Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021