Event Notification Report for August 26, 2002
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Operations Center Event Reports For 08/23/2002 - 08/26/2002 ** EVENT NUMBERS ** 39141 39144 39148 39149 39150 39151 39152 +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ |General Information or Other |Event Number: 39141 | +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | REP ORG: WA DIVISION OF RADIATION PROTECTION |NOTIFICATION DATE: 08/21/2002| |LICENSEE: PROVIDENCE EVERETT MEDICAL CENTER |NOTIFICATION TIME: 15:02[EDT]| | CITY: EVERETT REGION: 4 |EVENT DATE: 08/19/2002| | COUNTY: STATE: WA |EVENT TIME: [PDT]| |LICENSE#: WN-M0135-1 AGREEMENT: Y |LAST UPDATE DATE: 08/21/2002| | DOCKET: |+----------------------------+ | |PERSON ORGANIZATION | | |WILLIAM JOHNSON R4 | | |DOUG BROADDUS NMSS | +------------------------------------------------+ | | NRC NOTIFIED BY: TERRY C. FRAZEE (e-mail) | | | HQ OPS OFFICER: MIKE NORRIS | | +------------------------------------------------+ | |EMERGENCY CLASS: NON EMERGENCY | | |10 CFR SECTION: | | |NAGR AGREEMENT STATE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ EVENT TEXT +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | AGREEMENT STATE REPORT INVOLVING MEDICAL MISADMINISTRATION | | | | "The licensee reported that a patient received 2640 cGy (rad) during a | | cardiac intravascular brachytherapy treatment instead of the intended 2000 | | cGy (rad), a 32% overexposure. The patient was being treated with the | | Guidant Corporation Galileo intravascular brachytherapy high dose rate | | remote afterloader device (serial #27958502) with a model GDT-P32-2 source | | wire (serial #020807016) containing 4.44 GBq (119.9 [millicuries]) of P-32 | | at time of treatment. The patient's vessel size was larger than the | | automatically calculated maximum diameter treatment. A manual calculation | | of dwell time was required, based on the dose rate tables available in the | | Guidant Manual (section 6.13 table 5). However, the dose rate for a 4.6 mm | | diameter (3.30 mm treatment depth) was inadvertently used instead of 4.05 mm | | diameter (3.03 mm treatment depth). This resulted in a delivered dose of | | 2640 cGy (rad) at 3.03 mm. The cause of the event is human error. The | | licensee's corrective action is to have a second independent calculation | | performed by Physics and Dosimetry staff prior to treatment whenever a | | manual calculation using the dose rate tables is necessary. No adverse | | consequences are expected. The referring physician and the patient were | | notified of the overexposure." | +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ |Power Reactor |Event Number: 39144 | +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | FACILITY: MILLSTONE REGION: 1 |NOTIFICATION DATE: 08/22/2002| | UNIT: [] [] [3] STATE: CT |NOTIFICATION TIME: 17:06[EDT]| | RXTYPE: [1] GE-3,[2] CE,[3] W-4-LP |EVENT DATE: 08/22/2002| +------------------------------------------------+EVENT TIME: 16:33[EDT]| | NRC NOTIFIED BY: MICHAEL MARTELL |LAST UPDATE DATE: 08/23/2002| | HQ OPS OFFICER: FANGIE JONES +-----------------------------+ +------------------------------------------------+PERSON ORGANIZATION | |EMERGENCY CLASS: NON EMERGENCY |CLIFFORD ANDERSON R1 | |10 CFR SECTION: | | |AUNA 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B) UNANALYZED CONDITION | | | | | | | | | | | +-----+----------+-------+--------+-----------------+--------+-----------------+ |UNIT |SCRAM CODE|RX CRIT|INIT PWR| INIT RX MODE |CURR PWR| CURR RX MODE | +-----+----------+-------+--------+-----------------+--------+-----------------+ | | | | | | |3 N Y 95 Power Operation |95 Power Operation | +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ EVENT TEXT +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | UNANALYZED CONDITION CONCERNING STEAM GENERATOR ATMOSPHERIC RELIEF VALVE | | BYPASS VALVES | | | | Historical analysis deficiencies associated with the steam generator | | atmospheric dump bypass valves, a condition that during a fire could cause | | seriously degrade the safety of the plant. | | | | "The system affected is main steam, there are no actuation signals. The | | cause is historical analysis deficiencies. There are no affects on the | | plant. There are no actions taken or planned at this time and there is no | | additional information. The NRC Resident Inspector was notified. The State | | and Local Authorities have been notified." | | | | * * * UPDATE 1605EDT ON 8/23/02 FROM MICHAEL MARTELL TO S. SANDIN * * * | | | | The following information from Millstone Condition Report CR-02-08666 was | | provided by the licensee as an update: | | | | "On August 22, 2002, with Millstone Unit 3 in Mode 1, and as a result of | | transient analysis of the fire shutdown scenarios, the potential for | | spurious operation associated with the Main Steam atmospheric dump valve | | bypass motor operated valves (3MS*MOV74A thru D) from a hot short was found | | to result in non-compliance with the BTP 9.5-1 performance criteria. The | | Millstone Unit 3 licensing basis regarding BTP 9.5-1 performance criteria | | provides that a fire in an alternate shutdown area shall pose a transient no | | more severe than a reactor trip due to loss of normal power and that | | pressurizer level remain in the indicating range. Spurious operation of | | plant components due to credible hot shorts must be postulated and have | | methods for mitigation that do not require the use of any other component | | potentially affected by the fire. The current BTP 9.5-1 compliance report | | and shutdown methods address the spurious opening of the Main Steam | | atmospheric dump valve bypass motor operated valves. Fire safe shutdown | | procedures provide methods for mitigating this spurious actuation. | | | | "On-going effort to validate assumptions used in the fire safe shutdown | | analysis concluded that insufficient operator response time was available to | | support mitigation of this transient. It has been determined that spurious | | opening of one of the dump valves could cause pressurizer level to go below | | the indicating range in a time frame shorter than originally assumed. This | | condition is being reported as an unanalyzed condition that significantly | | degrades plant safety, pursuant to 50.72 (b)(3)(ii)(B). | | | | "It should be noted that, consistent with the Licensing Basis, this analysis | | assumes a fire of sufficient magnitude to result in an instantaneous hot | | short. Such fires are viewed to be very low probability events. The fire | | areas of concern are the control room and cable spreading area. The control | | room is continuously manned, and currently a continuous compensatory fire | | watch is required in the cable spreading room for other conditions. No | | additional compensatory actions are judged to be necessary at this time. | | Corrective actions are under evaluation in accordance with the Millstone | | corrective action program." | | | | The licensee informed the NRC Resident Inspector. Notified R1DO(Noggle). | +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ |General Information or Other |Event Number: 39148 | +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | REP ORG: GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY |NOTIFICATION DATE: 08/23/2002| |LICENSEE: GE NUCLEAR ENERGY |NOTIFICATION TIME: 15:45[EDT]| | CITY: SAN JOSE REGION: 4 |EVENT DATE: 08/23/2002| | COUNTY: STATE: CA |EVENT TIME: [PDT]| |LICENSE#: AGREEMENT: Y |LAST UPDATE DATE: 08/23/2002| | DOCKET: |+----------------------------+ | |PERSON ORGANIZATION | | |WILLIAM JOHNSON R4 | | |KEN BARR R2 | +------------------------------------------------+VERN HODGE - FAX NRR | | NRC NOTIFIED BY: JASON POST | | | HQ OPS OFFICER: FANGIE JONES | | +------------------------------------------------+ | |EMERGENCY CLASS: NON EMERGENCY | | |10 CFR SECTION: | | |CCCC 21.21 UNSPECIFIED PARAGRAPH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ EVENT TEXT +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | 10 CFR 21 REPORT: MAIN STEAM LINE OUT-OF-SERVICE | | | | The following is taken from a facsimile report: | | | | "This letter provides notification of a Reportable Condition under 10CFR | | 21.21(d) and as an interim report per �21.21.(a)(2) for other plants that | | may be determined to be affected. The basis for this conclusion is that a | | 1988 GE Nuclear Energy (GE) analysis for Brunswick Units 1 and 2 full power | | operation with one Main Steamline Isolation Valve (MSIV) Out of Service | | (OOS) provided to Carolina Power and Light (CP&L) did not adequately address | | the increased flow induced vibratory loads on the MSIVs to assure they would | | be able to perform their required safety function which could result in | | potential offsite exposures in excess of those in 10CFR100.11. | | | | "The GE MSIV OOS analysis evaluated plant operation at 100% power with three | | active steamlines and one set of MSIVs closed (OOS). The GE analysis did not | | address the increased steam flow hardware effect of potential long-term flow | | induced vibration degradation on the MSIVs, including the effect on the MSIV | | air operated controls. During three steamline operation the steam flow in | | each line would increase to approximately 133% of normal flow. No vibration | | measurements (empirical or experimental data) exist for either Brunswick | | Units during operation up to this increased steam flow level. | | | | "If it is postulated that the plant operated for an extended period in the | | MSIV OOS condition and then a main steam line break is postulated to occur | | in one of the three operational steam lines, then there is the potential | | that neither MSIV would close to terminate the release from a steamline | | break. Because GE has no analytical or experience basis (no available | | empirical or experimental data) to support higher main steam line flow rates | | greater than previously tested, it could be postulated that a common mode | | failure of both MSIVs, in the broken line, could occur. Alternatively, | | failure of one MSIV due to the high flow induced vibration and the other | | MSIV as the design basis single failure, would result in an un-terminated | | release, which would exceed the existing 10 CFR 100 radiation release | | limits. | | | | "GE has verbally communicated to CP&L the need for the 75% power limitation | | when exercising the MSIV OOS flexibility and will follow-up with a written | | communication. | | | | "GE is reviewing all other MSIV OOS analyses performed by GE for other BWRs | | and will communicate to any similarly affected utilities, similar corrective | | actions. GE will notify all affected utilities that GE recommends operation | | at the 75% power level when operating with one MSIV 005, unless there is | | sufficient test data to support operation at a higher power level. This | | effort will be completed by September 30, 2002." | +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ |Power Reactor |Event Number: 39149 | +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | FACILITY: ROBINSON REGION: 2 |NOTIFICATION DATE: 08/24/2002| | UNIT: [2] [] [] STATE: SC |NOTIFICATION TIME: 08:50[EDT]| | RXTYPE: [2] W-3-LP |EVENT DATE: 08/24/2002| +------------------------------------------------+EVENT TIME: 07:50[EDT]| | NRC NOTIFIED BY: DON KNIGHT |LAST UPDATE DATE: 08/24/2002| | HQ OPS OFFICER: RICH LAURA +-----------------------------+ +------------------------------------------------+PERSON ORGANIZATION | |EMERGENCY CLASS: NON EMERGENCY |KEN BARR R2 | |10 CFR SECTION: | | |ACOM 50.72(b)(3)(xiii) LOSS COMM/ASMT/RESPONSE| | | | | | | | | | | +-----+----------+-------+--------+-----------------+--------+-----------------+ |UNIT |SCRAM CODE|RX CRIT|INIT PWR| INIT RX MODE |CURR PWR| CURR RX MODE | +-----+----------+-------+--------+-----------------+--------+-----------------+ |2 N Y 100 Power Operation |100 Power Operation | | | | | | | +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ EVENT TEXT +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | PLANNED OUTAGE ON ERFIS SYSTEM | | | | "Emergency Response Data System (ERDS) and Safety Parameter Display System | | (SPDS) inoperable due to planned outage of the Emergency Response Facility | | Information System (ERFIS). | | | | "At 07:50 Hours on August 24, 2002, the H. B. Robinson Steam Electric Plant, | | Unit No. 2, ERFIS computer system was removed from service for a planned | | outage to upgrade this system. The expected duration of the outage is | | approximately 5 days. During this time, the ERDS and SPDS will be | | unavailable. Alternate means are identified in the HBRSEP, Unit No. 2, | | emergency preparedness procedures to collect and distribute data that would | | normally be available by the SPDS. The HBRSEP, Unit No. 2, Emergency | | Response Organization remains able to respond to an event during the time | | the ERFIS is unavailable. | | | | "The planned ERFIS changes. when completed, are not expected to change the | | ERDS transmission format or data point library. Therefore, additional | | reports in accordance with 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, VI. 3. a and b are not | | expected. | | | | "The NRC Resident Inspector has been notified." | +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ |Power Reactor |Event Number: 39150 | +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | FACILITY: CALLAWAY REGION: 4 |NOTIFICATION DATE: 08/24/2002| | UNIT: [1] [] [] STATE: MO |NOTIFICATION TIME: 09:33[EDT]| | RXTYPE: [1] W-4-LP |EVENT DATE: 08/24/2002| +------------------------------------------------+EVENT TIME: 08:26[CDT]| | NRC NOTIFIED BY: STEVE KOCHERT |LAST UPDATE DATE: 08/24/2002| | HQ OPS OFFICER: RICH LAURA +-----------------------------+ +------------------------------------------------+PERSON ORGANIZATION | |EMERGENCY CLASS: NON EMERGENCY |WILLIAM JOHNSON R4 | |10 CFR SECTION: | | |ACOM 50.72(b)(3)(xiii) LOSS COMM/ASMT/RESPONSE| | | | | | | | | | | +-----+----------+-------+--------+-----------------+--------+-----------------+ |UNIT |SCRAM CODE|RX CRIT|INIT PWR| INIT RX MODE |CURR PWR| CURR RX MODE | +-----+----------+-------+--------+-----------------+--------+-----------------+ |1 N Y 100 Power Operation |100 Power Operation | | | | | | | +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ EVENT TEXT +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | PLANNED LOSS OF THE EOF FOR 20 HOURS | | | | "During performance of planned maintenance, the Emergency Operation Facility | | (EOF) will be without ventilation capabilities. These maintenance | | activities, including electrical isolation and restoration are expected to | | last approximately 20 hours. Contingency plans for emergency situations have | | been established. | | | | "This event is reportable per 10 CFR50.72(b)(3)(xiii) since this constitutes | | a loss of an emergency response facility for the duration of the evolution. | | | | "The NRC Resident has been notified." | | | | * * * UPDATE AT 1445EDT ON 8/24/02 FROM STEVE KOCHERT TO S. SANDIN * * * | | | | At 1335CDT on 8/24/02 the EOF was declared functional and restored to | | operation. | | | | The licensee will inform the NRC Resident Inspector. Notified | | R4DO(Johnson). | +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ |Power Reactor |Event Number: 39151 | +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | FACILITY: CALVERT CLIFFS REGION: 1 |NOTIFICATION DATE: 08/24/2002| | UNIT: [1] [2] [] STATE: MD |NOTIFICATION TIME: 10:40[EDT]| | RXTYPE: [1] CE,[2] CE |EVENT DATE: 08/24/2002| +------------------------------------------------+EVENT TIME: 07:50[EDT]| | NRC NOTIFIED BY: LEO GETZ |LAST UPDATE DATE: 08/24/2002| | HQ OPS OFFICER: RICH LAURA +-----------------------------+ +------------------------------------------------+PERSON ORGANIZATION | |EMERGENCY CLASS: NON EMERGENCY |JAMES NOGGLE R1 | |10 CFR SECTION: | | |ACOM 50.72(b)(3)(xiii) LOSS COMM/ASMT/RESPONSE| | | | | | | | | | | +-----+----------+-------+--------+-----------------+--------+-----------------+ |UNIT |SCRAM CODE|RX CRIT|INIT PWR| INIT RX MODE |CURR PWR| CURR RX MODE | +-----+----------+-------+--------+-----------------+--------+-----------------+ |1 N Y 100 Power Operation |100 Power Operation | |2 N Y 100 Power Operation |100 Power Operation | | | | +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ EVENT TEXT +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | LOSS OF CALVERT COUNTY EP SIREN ACTIVATION SYSTEM DUE TO LIGHTNING STRIKES | | | | "At 07:50 on 8/24/02, notified by system engineer that Calvert County sirens | | are out of service due to multiple lightning strikes affecting the Calvert | | control center siren activation circuit. The county is using route alerting | | as a compensatory measure." | | | | The NRC resident inspector was notified. | +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ |Power Reactor |Event Number: 39152 | +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | FACILITY: BEAVER VALLEY REGION: 1 |NOTIFICATION DATE: 08/25/2002| | UNIT: [] [2] [] STATE: PA |NOTIFICATION TIME: 00:45[EDT]| | RXTYPE: [1] W-3-LP,[2] W-3-LP |EVENT DATE: 08/24/2002| +------------------------------------------------+EVENT TIME: 20:00[EDT]| | NRC NOTIFIED BY: PETE SENA |LAST UPDATE DATE: 08/25/2002| | HQ OPS OFFICER: RICH LAURA +-----------------------------+ +------------------------------------------------+PERSON ORGANIZATION | |EMERGENCY CLASS: NON EMERGENCY |JAMES NOGGLE R1 | |10 CFR SECTION: | | |AUNA 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B) UNANALYZED CONDITION | | |AIND 50.72(b)(3)(v)(D) ACCIDENT MITIGATION | | | | | | | | +-----+----------+-------+--------+-----------------+--------+-----------------+ |UNIT |SCRAM CODE|RX CRIT|INIT PWR| INIT RX MODE |CURR PWR| CURR RX MODE | +-----+----------+-------+--------+-----------------+--------+-----------------+ | | | |2 N Y 100 Power Operation |100 Power Operation | | | | +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ EVENT TEXT +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | GAS VOIDING IN ECCS PIPING | | | | "At 0425 hrs on 8/24/2002, a gas void was identified in Emergency Core | | Cooling System (ECCS) piping at Beaver Valley Power Station (BVPS) Unit No. | | 2 that exceeded the gas void volume limit of .872 cubic feet. A gas void | | which exceeds .872 cubic feet could potentially disable a single High Head | | Safety Injection (HHSI) pump if ingested. The gas void was located in the | | 'B' train piping which would be used (only) following the | | transfer-to-recirculation phase of a Loss of Coolant Accident (LOCA). | | Technical Specification Action 3.5.2.a and 3.5.2.d was entered for 'B' ECCS | | train not being operable. The piping where the void was located leads to a | | common HHSI pump suction header which connects to both trains' HHSI pumps. | | | | "At 1345 hrs on 8/24/2002, an isolation valve (2SIS-MOV863B) was | | de-energized closed. De-energizing this isolation valve prevents the gas | | void traveling to the common HHSI suction header during | | transfer-to-recirculation flow. This was done as a general precaution to | | strengthen the operable 'A' HHSI train during the ongoing gas void | | generation investigation since this gas void generation process was not yet | | fully understood. | | | | "At 1638 hrs on 8/24/2002 it was calculated that the actual gas void volume | | in the 'B' train piping was 1.3 cubic feet. It was also identified that the | | previously established gas void volume limit of .872 cubic feet was | | incorrect and the applicable gas void volume limit was .319 cubic feet. With | | an evaluation of the new gas void limit, it was concluded at 2000 hrs that | | BVPS Unit No. 2 had been vulnerable to a degradation of both trains' HHSI | | pumps between 0425 and 1345. This would be possible since the gas void could | | potentially have split in half (0.65 cubic feet) and migrated during | | post-LOCA transfer-to-recirculation flow through the common HHSI suction | | header. Each half-sized void could enter each train's HHSI pump, potentially | | affecting both trains of HHSI pumps (.65 cubic feet would exceed the limit | | of .319 cubic feet for each pump). This is reportable pursuant to | | 10CFR50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B) as being in an unanalyzed condition that | | significantly degraded plant safety. This is also reportable pursuant to | | 10CFR50.72(b)(3)(v)(D) as a condition that at the time of discovery could | | have prevented the fulfillment of the safety function of systems needed to | | mitigate consequences of an accident. | | | | "Currently with 2SIS-M0V863B de-energized closed, the gas void can not | | travel to the 'A' train HHSI pump. Actions are being initiated to eliminate | | this gas void. BVPS Unit No. 2 remains in Tech Specification Action 3.5.2.a | | and 3.5.2.d for one ECCS subsystem inoperable. The investigation of the gas | | void generation process is continuing." | | | | The NRC Resident Inspector was notified. | +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021