EA-96-135 - Innovative Weaponry, Inc.
May 15, 1996
Innovative Weaponry, Inc.
ATTN: Mr. David Gregor, President
337 Eubank NE
Albuquerque, New Mexico 87123
|SUBJECT: ||NOTICE OF VIOLATION AND PROPOSED IMPOSITION OF CIVIL PENALTY – $7,500 AND CONFIRMATORY ORDER MODIFYING LICENSE (EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY) |
(NRC Investigation Report No. 4-95-022)
Dear Mr. Gregor:
This refers to the predecisional enforcement conference conducted on April 23, 1996, with you and other Innovative Weaponry, Inc. (IWI) representatives in the NRC's offices in Rockville, Maryland. A list of conference attendees is enclosed (Enclosure 1).
The conference was conducted to discuss apparent violations identified during an NRC investigation conducted between May 9, 1995, and March 22, 1996. These apparent violations, as well as the concern that they may have been committed willfully by company officers, were discussed by telephone with an IWI representative on April 11, 1996, and were briefly described in a letter sent to IWI on April 17, 1996.
Based on the information developed during the investigation and on our consideration of the information that you provided during the conference, the NRC has determined that violations of NRC requirements occurred. These violations, which IWI admitted at the conference, are cited in the enclosed Notice of Violation and Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty (Enclosure 2). Specifically, the NRC concludes that IWI distributed licensed material, i.e. tritium, in various gunsights that were not approved by the NRC and not authorized on the license and that IWI distributed tritium sources that were obtained from a manufacturer not authorized on the license.
At the conference, IWI officials admitted that violations had occurred but denied that there was any intent to commit them. Notwithstanding the Licensee's position on intent, the NRC is concerned that the violations resulted from a lack of effective action to assure compliance with license requirements, despite IWI officials being aware that the NRC license contained limitations on what could and could not be distributed. This awareness should have prompted IWI to make certain that it both understood and was conducting its business in compliance with the license while it was seeking to amend it.
Thus, even though these violations did not result in any actual safety impacts, they are nonetheless significant from a regulatory standpoint. Therefore, the violations in the enclosed Notice have been categorized as a Severity Level III problem in accordance with the "General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions" (Enforcement Policy), NUREG-1600.
In accordance with the Enforcement Policy, a base civil penalty in the amount of $2,500 is considered for a Severity Level III problem. In this case, given management's failure to assure that requirements were met and that the license was understood, I have been authorized, after consultation with the Director, Office of Enforcement and the Deputy Executive Director for Nuclear Materials Safety, Safeguards and Operations Support, to exercise discretion pursuant to section VII.A.1 of the Enforcement Policy and propose a civil penalty of $7,500.
At the conference and at the licensing meeting that followed it, IWI officials voluntarily made various commitments to correct these violations and to assure that future operations will be conducted in strict accordance with the license conditions. These commitments included the development of a training program for all IWI employees whose activities may affect compliance with NRC requirements, and the hiring of a third-party, independent auditor to develop an audit plan and conduct periodic audits of IWI to assure continued compliance with all NRC requirements. These commitments are described in more detail and are confirmed in the enclosed Confirmatory Order Modifying License.
Pursuant to section 223 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, any person who willfully violates, attempts to violate, or conspires to violate, any provision of the enclosed Order shall be subject to criminal prosecution as set forth in that section. Violation of this order may also subject the person to civil monetary penalty.
You are required to respond to the Notice and the enclosed Order and should follow the instructions in each when preparing your response. In your response to the Notice, you should document the specific actions taken and any additional actions you plan to prevent recurrence. After reviewing your response to this Notice, including your proposed corrective actions and the results of future inspections, the NRC will determine whether further NRC enforcement action is necessary to ensure compliance with NRC regulatory requirements.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter, its enclosures, and your response will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room (PDR). To the extent possible, your response should not include any personal privacy, proprietary, or safeguards information so that it can be placed in the PDR without redaction.
|Sincerely, ||James Lieberman, Director |
Office of Enforcement
Docket No. 030-30266
License No. 30-23697-01E
Conference Attendance List
Notice of Violation and Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty
Confirmatory Order Modifying License
State of New Mexico
NOTICE OF VIOLATION
PROPOSED IMPOSITION OF CIVIL PENALTY
|Innovative Weaponry, Inc. of Nevada |
Albuquerque, New Mexico
|Docket No. 030-30266 |
License No. 30-23697-01E
During an NRC investigation conducted between May 9, 1995 and March 22, 1996, violations of NRC requirements were identified. In accordance with the "General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," NUREG-1600, the violations are listed below:
A. License No. 30-23697-01E authorizes the licensee to distribute SRB Technologies, Inc., Model PRH-800/G/200 sealed light sources.
Contrary to the above, from June to August 1995, the licensee distributed tritium sealed light sources from a manufacturer not authorized in the license. (01013)
B. License Condition 10 of License No. 30-23697-01E authorizes the licensee to distribute sealed light sources in specified gunsights and in specified configurations.
Contrary to the above, from July to September 1995, the licensee distributed tritium sealed light sources in configurations not specified or otherwise authorized in the license. (01023)
These violations represent a Severity Level III problem (Supplement VI).
Civil Penalty - $7,500.
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Innovative Weaponry, Inc., is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the Director, Office of Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, within 30 days of the date of this Notice of Violation and Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty (Notice). This reply should be clearly marked as a "Reply to a Notice of Violation" and should include for each alleged violation: (1) admission or denial of the alleged violation, (2) the reasons for the violation if admitted, and if denied, the reasons why, (3) the corrective steps that have been taken and the results achieved, (4) the corrective steps that will be taken to avoid further violations, and (5) the date when full compliance will be achieved. If an adequate reply is not received within the time specified in this Notice, an order or a Demand for Information may be issued as to why the license should not be modified, suspended, or revoked or why such other action as may be proper should not be taken. Consideration may be given to expanding the response time for good cause shown. Under the authority of Section 182 of the Act, 42 U.S.C. 2232, this response shall be submitted under oath or affirmation.
Within the same time as provided for the response required above under 10 CFR 2.201, the Licensee may pay the civil penalty by letter addressed to the Director, Office of Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, with a check, draft, money order, or electronic transfer payable to the Treasurer of the United States in the amount of the civil penalty proposed above, or the cumulative amount of the civil penalties if more than one civil penalty is proposed, or may protest imposition of the civil penalty in whole or in part, by a written answer addressed to the Director, Office of Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Should the Licensee fail to answer within the time specified, an order imposing the civil penalty will be issued. Should the Licensee elect to file an answer in accordance with 10 CFR 2.205 protesting the civil penalty, in whole or in part, such answer should be clearly marked as an "Answer to a Notice of Violation" and may: (1) deny the violation(s) listed in this Notice, in whole or in part, (2) demonstrate extenuating circumstances, (3) show error in this Notice, or (4) show other reasons why the penalty should not be imposed. In addition to protesting the civil penalty in whole or in part, such answer may request remission or mitigation of the penalty.
In requesting mitigation of the proposed penalty, the factors addressed in Section VI.B.2 of the Enforcement Policy should be addressed. Any written answer in accordance with 10 CFR 2.205 should be set forth separately from the statement or explanation in reply pursuant to 10 CFR 2.201, but may incorporate parts of the 10 CFR 2.201 reply by specific reference (e.g., citing page and paragraph numbers) to avoid repetition. The attention of the Licensee is directed to the other provisions of 10 CFR 2.205, regarding the procedure for imposing a civil penalty.
Upon failure to pay any civil penalty due which subsequently has been determined in accordance with the applicable provisions of 10 CFR 2.205, this matter may be referred to the Attorney General, and the penalty, unless compromised, remitted, or mitigated, may be collected by civil action pursuant to Section 234c of the Act, 42 U.S.C. 2282c.
The response noted above (Reply to Notice of Violation, letter with payment of civil penalty, and Answer to a Notice of Violation) should be addressed to: James Lieberman, Director, Office of Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852-2738, with a copy to the Regional Administrator, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region IV.
Because your response will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room (PDR), to the extent possible, it should not include any personal privacy, proprietary, or safeguards information so that it can be placed in the PDR without redaction. However, if you find it necessary to include such information, you should clearly indicate the specific information that you desire not to be placed in the PDR, and provide the legal basis to support your request for withholding the information from the public.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland
this 15th day of May 1996
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
In the Matter of
INNOVATIVE WEAPONRY, INC.
Albuquerque, New Mexico
Docket No. 030-30266
License No. 30-23697-01E
CONFIRMATORY ORDER MODIFYING LICENSE
Innovative Weaponry, Inc. of Nevada, (IWI or Licensee) is the holder of NRC License No. 30-23697-01E issued by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or Commission) pursuant to 10 CFR Part 30. The license authorizes the Licensee to distribute byproduct material (i.e., tritium) in gunsights as specified in the license. The license was transferred from IWI of New Mexico to IWI of Nevada on April 3, 1995. Although due to expire on June 30, 1993, the license has remained active based on a timely renewal application.
Based on its review of the results of an NRC investigation conducted from May 9, 1995, through March 22, 1996, the NRC identified the following apparent violations of IWI's license conditions: 1) IWI distributed tritium in gunsights not approved by the NRC and not specifically authorized on the license; and 2) IWI distributed tritium sources obtained from a manufacturer not authorized on the license. In addition, as indicated in a letter issued to IWI on April 17, 1996, it appeared that the violations were committed by the President and Executive Vice President of the company.
These apparent violations and the concern that they were committed by the President and Executive Vice President were discussed with IWI representatives at a predecisional enforcement conference in Rockville, Maryland on April 23, 1996. The Licensee admitted that violations had occurred but denied that there was any intent to commit the violations. Notwithstanding the Licensee's position on intent, the NRC is concerned that the violations resulted from a lack of effective action to assure compliance with license requirements, despite IWI officials being aware that the NRC license contained limitations on what could and could not be distributed.
As a result of the NRC investigation, the NRC staff questioned whether it should have the requisite reasonable assurance that IWI will comply with agency requirements. At the predecisional enforcement conference and a meeting on the same date to discuss license amendment issues, the Licensee voluntarily committed to actions to address the NRC's concerns about its ability to conduct its activities in compliance with the license and applicable NRC requirements. The Licensee offered to develop the following plans and to submit them to the NRC for approval: 1) a training plan to assure that all IWI employees, including management, understand the NRC license and applicable NRC requirements; 2) an audit plan to assure compliance with requirements to be implemented by a third-party, independent auditor; and 3) development of written procedures to maintain accountability, control, and security of materials authorized by the NRC for distribution. The NRC has concluded that implementation of these commitments, which are described in more detail below, would provide the necessary assurance that licensed activities will be in compliance with NRC requirements in the future.
I find that the Licensee's commitments set forth at the predecisional enforcement conference and licensing meetings conducted on April 23, 1996, are acceptable and necessary and conclude that with these commitments the public health, safety and interest are reasonably assured. In a telephone call on May 8, 1996, with Mr. James Tourtellotte, the Licensee's attorney, the Licensee agreed to this action. I have also determined, based on the Licensee's consent and on the significance of the conduct described above, that the public health and safety require that this Order be immediately effective.
Accordingly, pursuant to sections 81, 161b, 161i, 161o, 182 and 186 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, and the Commission's regulations in 10 CFR 2.202 and 10 CFR Part 30, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY, THAT LICENSE NO. 30-23697-01E IS MODIFIED AS FOLLOWS:
The Licensee shall submit for NRC approval, within 30 days of the issuance of this Order, a training plan designed to assure that all IWI employees, including management, who are involved in activities that may affect compliance with the NRC license are familiar with the conditions and restrictions contained in the license, as well as with all other applicable NRC requirements. The training plan also shall provide for training in accountability, control, and security of licensed material in gunsights authorized by the NRC for distribution to persons exempt from licensing. The training plan shall provide for initial training of all existing employees, including management, within 30 days of the issuance of this Order, training for new employees, including management, prior to their working with licensed materials, and annual refresher training thereafter.
a. The Licensee shall submit for NRC approval, within 30 days of the date of this Order, the name and qualifications of an independent auditor or auditors whom the Licensee proposes to conduct the audits described below and who are capable of conducting such audits to assure compliance with all NRC license conditions and requirements.
b. The Licensee shall submit for NRC approval, within 30 days of the NRC's approval of the above auditor, an audit plan which shall provide for periodic audits to assure compliance with all NRC license conditions and requirements. The audit plan shall provide for an initial audit, followed by quarterly audits for a 1-year period, and semi-annual audits thereafter. The audit plan shall provide for audit reports to be issued to the Licensee and the NRC at the same time within 30 days of the completion of each audit. The audit report shall contain findings on the Licensee's state of compliance with NRC requirements and recommendations to achieve compliance if deficiencies are noted. The plan shall provide for the Licensee to respond in writing to all audit findings within 30 days of each audit report, with a copy to the NRC. The response shall state the actions taken by the licensee to address audit recommendations with which the Licensee agrees. For those recommendations that the Licensee disputes, the Licensee shall provide the basis for dispute and any other action taken.
3. The Licensee shall develop and implement, within 30 days of the issuance of this Order, written procedures designed to maintain inventory and accountability of gunsights with sources authorized by the NRC for distribution to persons exempt from licensing.
4. Upon approval of the actions required under items 1 and 2.a above, items 1 and 2.b shall be implemented until relaxed by the Regional Administrator, Region IV.
5. Requests for approval of the auditor, audit plan, training plan, and for changes of the approved auditor, changes to the audit plan, and to reports required to be submitted, shall be submitted to the Regional Administrator, Region IV, with a copy to the Director, Office of Nuclear Materials Safety and Safeguards.
The Regional Administrator, Region IV, may relax or rescind, in writing, any of the above conditions upon a showing by the Licensee of good cause.
Any person adversely affected by this Confirmatory Order, other than the Licensee, may request a hearing within 20 days of its issuance. Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the time to request a hearing. A request for extension of time must be made in writing to the Director, Office of Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555, and include a statement of good cause for the extension. Any request for a hearing shall be submitted to the Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Chief, Docketing and Service Section, Washington, D.C. 20555. Copies also shall be sent to the Director, Office of Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555, to the Assistant General Counsel for Hearings and Enforcement at the same address, to the Regional Administrator, NRC Region IV, 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 400, Arlington, Texas 76011, and to the Licensee. If such a person requests a hearing, that person shall set forth with particularity the manner in which his interest is adversely affected by this Order and shall address the criteria set forth in 10 CFR 2.714(d).
If a hearing is requested by a person whose interest is adversely affected, the Commission will issue an Order designating the time and place of any hearing. If a hearing is held, the issue to be considered at such hearing shall be whether this Confirmatory Order should be sustained.
Pursuant to 10 CFR 2.202(c)(2)(i), any person other than the Licensee, adversely affected by the Order, may, in addition to demanding a hearing, at the time the answer is filed or sooner, move the presiding officer to set aside the immediate effectiveness of the Order on the ground that the Order, including the need for immediate effectiveness, is not based on adequate evidence but on mere suspicion, unfounded allegations, or error.
In the absence of any request for hearing, or written approval of an extension of time in which to request a hearing, the provisions specified in Section IV above shall be final 20 days from the date of this Order without further order or proceedings. If an extension of time for requesting a hearing has been approved, the provisions specified in Section IV shall be final when the extension expires if a hearing request has not been received. AN ANSWER OR A REQUEST FOR HEARING SHALL NOT STAY THE IMMEDIATE EFFECTIVENESS OF THIS ORDER.
| || |
FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
James Lieberman, Director
Office of Enforcement
Dated at Rockville, Maryland
this 15th day of May 1996
Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 13, 2018