The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission is in the process of rescinding or revising guidance and policies posted on this webpage in accordance with Executive Order 14151 Ending Radical and Wasteful Government DEI Programs and Preferencing, and Executive Order 14168 Defending Women From Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government. In the interim, any previously issued diversity, equity, inclusion, or gender-related guidance on this webpage should be considered rescinded that is inconsistent with these Executive Orders.

Thermal-Hydraulic Phenomena/Future Plant Designs - February 15, 2002

ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON REACTOR SAFEGUARDS
COMBINED THERMAL-HYDRAULIC PHENOMENA/FUTURE PLANT DESIGNS:
SUBCOMMITTEE MEETING:
ANO-2/CLINTON POWER STATION CORE POWER UPRATE REQUESTS
AP1000 PHASE 2 ADVANCED PLANT DESIGN REVIEW
FEBRUARY 13-15, 2002
ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND

PRESENTATION SCHEDULE

Contact: P. Boehnert (301/415-8065) (pab2@nrc.gov)
A. Singh (415-6899) (axs@nrc.gov)
M. El-Zeftawy (415-6889) (mme@nrc.gov)

February 13, 2002

  TOPIC PRESENTER TIME
I. Opening Remarks G. Wallis, Chairman 8:30 a.m.
II. Arkansas Nuclear One, Unit 2 Power Uprate    
  A. Entergy Presentations (Closed as Necessary) Entergy 8:35 a.m.
 
  1. Introduction
  2.  Plant Changes to Accommodate Power Uprate
   
  - Include Discussion of Necessary Modifications to Plant Operating Parameters/Plant Hardware (e.g. BAM tank, RV Fluence & P-T Limits)
  3. Compliance with Regulatory Requirements    
  -Analyses Performed
- Impact on Plant Margins
   
  4. Review Issues:    
  - Plant Operator Training/Impact on Operator Action Times
- ATWS Event Response for Uprate Conditions
- Fuel response for ATWS/Power Excursions
- Material Degradation Issues (e.g., Alloy 600/FAC)
- SG Tube Integrity
- Impact on Containment Response/P,T Limits
- Piping Stress Limits
- Inspection Program
 
  5. ECCS Analyses    
  - Results    
  6. Resolution of Open Issues    
  - Radiological Analyses for Control Room, SGTR and LOCA    
  7. PRA Analyses    
  - Analyses Performed/Results (CDF/LERF, CDFs & LERFs, Associated Uncertainties)
- Evaluation of Other PRA Elements (e.g., fire, seismic, shutdown risk)
   
  8. Concluding Remarks    
  ***LUNCH***   12:00 p.m.
  B. NRR Presentations (Open) NRR 1:00 p.m.
  1. Introduction    
  - Scope of SE    
  2. Reactor Systems Review
3. Plant Systems Review
4. Mechanical & Civil Engineering Review (including RSGs, NSSS & BOP Piping)
5. Materials & Chemical Engineering Review (including SG tube integrity, CEDMs, RV Fluence/PT Limits, Alloy 600 Program)
6. Resolution of Open Issues (addressed in Radiological Analyses Review)
7. PRA Analyses/Evaluation Of Licensee's PRA Examinations
8. Concluding Remarks
 
  C. Subcommittee Caucus (Open)   2:30 p.m.
 
  1. Comments on Meeting Presentations
  2. Follow-on Actions
  3. Decision to Bring Review to ACRS/Instructions to Presenters
   
III. Recess   2:45 p.m.
IV. Clinton Power Station, Unit 1 Extended Power Uprate      
  A. Opening Remarks G. Wallis, Chairman, 3:00 p.m.
  B. AmerGen Presentations
(Closed as Necessary)
Amergen/GENE 3:15 p.m.
 
  1. Introduction
  2. Plant Changes to Accommodate Power Uprate
  3. Compliance with Regulatory Requirements
   
  - Hardware Modifications
- Analyses Performed
- Exceptions To ELTR1/ 2 Requirements
- Impact on Plant Margins
   
  4. Review Issues:    
  - Plant Operator Training/ Operator Action Times
- Stability Monitor/ Instability Avoidance
- ATWS Event Rsponse for Uprate Conditions
- Fuel response for ATWS/Power Excursions
- Material Degradation Issues (e.g.,IASCC/FAC)
- Impact on Containment Response/Load Limits
- Piping Stress Limits
- Inspection Program
- Impact of Uprate on Steam Separator/Dryer System
   
V. Recess   6:00 p.m.

February 14, 2002

VI. Reconvene   G. Wallis, Chairman 8:30 a.m.
VII. Clinton Uprate (Cont.)      
  B. AmerGen Presentations (Cont.)
(Closed as Necessary)
   
  5. ECCS Analyses AmerGen 8:40 a.m.
  - Results    
  6. PRA Analyses    
  - Analyses Performed/ Results (CDF/LERF, CDFs & LERFs, Associated Uncertainties(1))
- Evaluation of Other PRA Elements(2) (e.g., fire, seismic, shutdown risk)
   
  7. Concluding Remarks   10:00a.m.
  C. NRR Presentations (Open) NRR 10:15 a.m.
  1. Introduction    
  - Staff Evaluation
- Comments on SER Quality Upgrade
   
  2. Reactor Systems Review
3. Plant Systems Review
4. Response to ACRS Questions
   
  - Review of Exceptions to ELTR1&2
- Material Degradation Issues
- PRA Analyses/Evaluation Of Licensee's PRA Examinations
- Human Performance
   
  5. Concluding Remarks    
  D. Subcommittee Caucus (Open)   11:45 a.m.
 
  1. Comments on Meeting Presentations
  2. Follow-on Actions
  3. Decision to Bring Review to ACRS/ Instructions to Presenters
   
VIII. Recess   12:00 p.m.
IX. AP1000 Phase 2 Pre-Application Review      
  A. Introduction T. Kress, ACRS 1:00 p.m.
  B. NRC Overview A. Drozd, NRR 1:05 p.m.
  C. Design Acceptance Criteria & Exemptions    
 
  1. Summary of Staff Position
  2. Background
  3. Relevant Technical Issues
  4. Westinghouse Response
A. Drozd
J. Wilson, NRR
D. Terao/G. Bagchi, NRR
W Representative
 
  ***BREAK***   3:00 p.m.
  D. Staff Position on Codes/Testing A. Drozd 3:15 p.m.
 
  1. Applicability of AP600 Scaling
  2. Westinghouse Response
  3. Subcommittee Discussion
S. Bajorek
W Representative
3:25 p.m.
4:30 p.m.
4:45 p.m.
X. Recess   5:00 p.m.

February 15, 2002

XI. Reconvene   T. Kress 8:30 a.m.
  D. Staff Position on Codes/Testing (Cont.)    
  4. Applicability of AP600 Codes    
  - Reactor Codes
- Westinghouse Response
W. Jensen, NRR
W Representative
8:35 a.m.
9:40 a.m.
  ***BREAK***   10:15 a.m.
  - WGOTHIC Containment Code
- Westinghouse Response
E. Throm
W Representative
10:30 a.m.
11:00 a.m.
  E. Subcommittee Caucus (Open)   11:30 a.m.
 
  1. Comments on Meeting Presentations
  2. Follow-on Actions
  3. Decision to Bring Review to ACRS/Instructions to Presenters
   
XII. Adjourn   11:45 a.m.

1. If uncertainty evaluations not performed, provide a qualitative discussion of this matter.

2. If quantitative analyses not available, provide rigorous qualitative arguments.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, July 13, 2020