Skip to main content

Alert

Due to a lapse in appropriations, the NRC has ceased normal operations. However, excepted and exempted activities necessary to maintain critical health and safety functions—as well as essential progress on designated critical activities, including those specified in Executive Order 14300—will continue, consistent with the OMB-Approved NRC Lapse Plan.

Health Physics Questions and Answers - Question 59

Question 59: How does the U.S. Supreme Court decision in the case of United Auto Workers (UAW) vs Johnson Controls affect the NRC requirement in 10 CFR 20.1208, "Dose to an embryo / fetus," and the guidance in Regulatory Guide 8.13, "Instruction Concerning Prenatal Exposure?"

Answer: That decision has no effect on either the requirement or the guide, which are consistent with that decision. (Reference: Letter from Bill M. Morris, NRC / RES, to William E. Morgan, the Boeing Company, August 2, 1991).

For the information of those not familiar with this decision, the Supreme Court in this case overturned a U.S. Court of Appeals decision. In its decision, the Supreme Court responded in the negative to the question, "May an employer exclude a fertile female employee from certain jobs because of its concern for the health of the fetus a woman might conceive?" The court held that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, forbids sex-specific fetal-protection policies. The majority of the court concluded with a very strong statement: "It is no more appropriate for the courts than it is for individual employers to decide whether a woman's reproductive role is more important to herself and her family than her economic role. Congress has left this choice to the woman as hers to make."

(References: 20.1208, Regulatory Guide 8.13)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, December 12, 2017

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, December 12, 2017