The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission is in the process of rescinding or revising guidance and policies posted on this webpage in accordance with Executive Order 14151 Ending Radical and Wasteful Government DEI Programs and Preferencing, and Executive Order 14168 Defending Women From Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government. In the interim, any previously issued diversity, equity, inclusion, or gender-related guidance on this webpage should be considered rescinded that is inconsistent with these Executive Orders.

Health Physics Questions and Answers - Question 59

Question 59: How does the U.S. Supreme Court decision in the case of United Auto Workers (UAW) vs Johnson Controls affect the NRC requirement in 10 CFR 20.1208, "Dose to an embryo / fetus," and the guidance in Regulatory Guide 8.13, "Instruction Concerning Prenatal Exposure?"

Answer: That decision has no effect on either the requirement or the guide, which are consistent with that decision. (Reference: Letter from Bill M. Morris, NRC / RES, to William E. Morgan, the Boeing Company, August 2, 1991).

For the information of those not familiar with this decision, the Supreme Court in this case overturned a U.S. Court of Appeals decision. In its decision, the Supreme Court responded in the negative to the question, "May an employer exclude a fertile female employee from certain jobs because of its concern for the health of the fetus a woman might conceive?" The court held that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, forbids sex-specific fetal-protection policies. The majority of the court concluded with a very strong statement: "It is no more appropriate for the courts than it is for individual employers to decide whether a woman's reproductive role is more important to herself and her family than her economic role. Congress has left this choice to the woman as hers to make."

(References: 20.1208, Regulatory Guide 8.13)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, December 12, 2017