The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission is in the process of rescinding or revising guidance and policies posted on this webpage in accordance with Executive Order 14151 Ending Radical and Wasteful Government DEI Programs and Preferencing, and Executive Order 14168 Defending Women From Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government. In the interim, any previously issued diversity, equity, inclusion, or gender-related guidance on this webpage should be considered rescinded that is inconsistent with these Executive Orders.

Health Physics Questions and Answers - Question 150

Question 150: 10 CFR 20.1003 defines tissue monitoring depths of 0.007, 0.3, and 1 cm for shallow, eye, and deep-dose, respectively;

(a) Is it important to measure at (or extrapolate the measurements to) these exact depths?

(b) could the eye and deep-dose both be determined at 0.3 cm?

Answer: See the "general response" in the answer to Question 149.

(a) As under the old Part 20, it is important to measure (or to extrapolate measurements to, or otherwise assess the dose equivalent) at a reasonable approximation of these depths.

(b) No. The deep-dose equivalent is, by definition, the dose equivalent at a depth of 1 cm, not 0.3 cm. However, the dose at 0.3 cm (eye dose) would usually be a conservative approximation (overestimate) of the dose at 1 cm deep-dose).

(References: 10 CFR 20.1003)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, November 07, 2017