Report a Safety Concern
Search

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission is in the process of rescinding or revising guidance and policies posted on this webpage in accordance with Executive Order 14151 Ending Radical and Wasteful Government DEI Programs and Preferencing, and Executive Order 14168 Defending Women From Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government. In the interim, any previously issued diversity, equity, inclusion, or gender-related guidance on this webpage should be considered rescinded that is inconsistent with these Executive Orders.

Home About NRC Radiation Protection How the NRC Protects You Health Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

Health Physics Questions and Answers - Question 145

Question 145: Automated personnel contamination monitors ("portal monitors") are used at nuclear power plants to detect radioactive surface contamination on the skin and clothing of workers. The alarm setpoints for these monitors are maintained very low to detect low levels of surface contamination and hot particles. Implementation of the "respirator ALARA rule," [10 CFR 20.1702 and 20.1703 (b) (1)] may result in intakes of radioactive material by workers that will trigger the alarms on these monitors. Would the NRC object if, to facilitate compliance with the "new respirator ALARA rule", portal monitor set points were raised to a more reasonable level?

Answer: Set points for automated personnel contamination monitors are established by, and can be changed by, licensees without NRC approval. NRC has no requirement that licensees use automated personnel monitors nor does it have numerical guidance on set points for these monitors (unless a licensee has committed to using automated personnel contamination monitors, with a particular set point in a license application). However, if a licensee uses these monitors and the monitor alarms because of an intake (rather than because of external contamination), that intake should be evaluated. The question implies that the detection of small intakes of radioactive material using these monitors is undesirable and should be avoided by raising the monitor set points above their current levels. This is not necessarily the case. At least one nuclear power reactor licensee has recognized that the sensitivity of these monitors for detecting intakes can be used to advantage in internal "passive internal monitoring program" for workers for whom individual monitoring for intake is not required by 10 CFR 20.1502 (b). That licensee plans to use these monitors with a setpoint that results in the reliable detection of internal contamination equivalent to 1% of the ALI for mixtures of radionuclides encountered in the licensee's plant.

(Reference: 10 CFR 20.1702)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, November 07, 2017