For the Record - 2005
The NRC responds to information on controversial issues or to significant media reports that could be misleading. This site will also be used to respond to large write-in campaigns more efficiently. For more information, Contact a Public Affairs Officer.
This page includes links to files in non-HTML format. See Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools for more information.
|11/30/2005||Letter to Newsday on License Renewal|
|11/14/2005||Letter to GSN Magazine on Evacuations|
|10/12/2005||NRC's Letter to ABC on the Security of Research Reactors|
|09/14/2005||Letter to the Editor, Business Week, re Possible Nuclear Plant Accident Effects|
|09/02/2005||Letter to the Editor, Asbury Park Press, re Oyster Creek License Renewal|
|06/14/2005||Letter to the Editor, Time Magazine|
|05/25/2005||Letter to the Editor, The Blade|
|04/23/2005||Letter to the Editor of the Brattleboro Reformer|
|04/15/2005||Letter to the Editor, The Washington Post|
|03/21/2005||Letter to the Editor, Suffolk Life (Amityville Edition)|
|02/15/2005||The Fox program "24" is dramatic fiction. Nuclear power plants in the United States have redundant safety systems and several very robust physical barriers as well as well-established emergency plans that help ensure people living near these plants are kept safe.|
|01/31/2005||Fox Television's Jan. 31, "24" program airs a plot centered around the use of a "black box" that could remotely operate all 104 U.S. nuclear power plants via the Internet. For the record, there is no such black box or suitcase for controlling nuclear power plants. Control systems at the plants are not accessible via the Internet.|