Fire Protection Policy Steering Committee Report (Generic Letter 85-01)
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 January 9, 1985 TO ALL POWER REACTOR LICENSEES AND ALL APPLICANTS FOR POWER REACTOR LICENSES Gentlemen: SUBJECT: FIRE PROTECTION POLICY STEERING COMMITTEE REPORT (Generic Letter 85-01) Enclosed is a copy of the NRC Fire Protection Policy Steering Committee Report, dated October 26, 1984. The background and purpose of the Steering Committee is described in the report. A notice will be published in the Federal Register in the near future that will provide an opportunity for public comments on this report. No response to this letter is required. Darrell G. Eisenhut, Director Division of Licensing Enclosure: As stated . ENCLOSURE UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555 October 26, 1984 MEMORANDUM FOR: William J. Dircks Executive Director for Operations FROM: Fire Protection Policy Steering Committee SUBJECT: RECOMMENDED FIRE PROTECTION POLICY AND PROGRAM ACTIONS Introduction At an August 27, 1984 meeting on fire protection, you directed that a review of current fire protection issues be conducted and that recommendations for resolution of these issues be made within two months. This effort was to examine all current licensing, inspection, and technical issues to develop policy recommendations aimed at expediting Appendix R compliance for older plants and assuring consistent levels of fire protection safety at all plants. By your memorandum dated September 13, 1984 (Enclosure 1) to the NRR and IE Office Directors and the Regional Administrators, you confirmed this direction and approved a Steering Committee to provide appropriate recommendations. You indicated that, among the issues to be considered, were: o adequacy of current guidance to industry; o interpretation of Appendix R requirements; o treatment of technical. and schedular exemptions; o comparison of Appendix R and current NTOL plants for fire protection safety; o adequacy of current inspection practices; and o identification and resolution plan for any outstanding technical issues. In response to this direction, the Fire Protection Policy Steering Committee (SC) has considered the broad range of fire protection issues necessary to arrive at policy recommendations. The SC has reviewed documents which provide the basis for current fire protection policies and which discuss many of the issues that could significantly delay Appendix R compliance and question consistency in fire protection safety at all plants. The SC held six meetings. These included meetings with the Senior NRC Managers, the NRR and IE Office Directors, and the fire protection engineers from NRR, IE, and the Regions. At the latter meeting, the candid views of the individuals intimately involved in the fire protection issues were solicited and received. A record of the SC meetings is included as Enclosure to GL 85-01, Re: Fire Protection Policy . William J. Dircks - 2 - OCT 26 1984 Enclosure 7. Finally, the SC received significant input from Thomas Wambach, who acted as Secretary to the SC, and the Working Group, headed by Faust Rosa, NRR, and composed of V. Benaroya, C. Grimes, and V. Moore of NRR; S. Richardson, IE; W. Shields, OELD; and C. Anderson, T. Conlon, and W. Little of Regions I, II and III respectively. The recommendations of the SC are provided below. We believe that this responds to your direction, and when fully implemented, represent actions that will indeed expedite Appendix R compliance and assure consistent levels of fire protection safety at all plants. The SC is aware that not all parties will be fully satisfied with these actions. Nor have our recommendations been reviewed by the cognizant Offices or Regions. However, we believe that they represent sound judgments balanced with other competing safety priorities, and that with your approval the plan can and should be initiated promptly. Recommendations To expedite Appendix R compliance and assure consistent levels of fire protection safety at all plants, the Fire Protection Steering Committee recommends that the following actions be taken: 1. Promptly issue the enclosed Generic Letter (Enclosure 2) informing all licensees that: (a) Extensions to the 50.48(c) schedules will no longer be granted; (b) An expedited fire protection inspection program will be instituted; (c) Documentation of valid analyses supporting fire protection features must be available for inspection; (d) Quality assurance applicable to fire protection systems is that required by GDC-1 of Appendix A to 10 CFR Part 50; and (e) The interpretations of Appendix R, (Enclosure 3) which should facilitate industry implementation of Appendix R and the responses to industry questions (Enclosure 6) represent the official agency position on all issues covered. (It should be noted that The Commission requested these documents for their review prior to issuance to industry.) Enclosure to GL 85-01, Re: Fire Protection Policy . William J. Dircks - 3 - OCT 26 1984 2. Conduct fire protection inspections within CY 1985 at ORs and NTOLs to include at least one site per licensee not subject to a previous Appendix R fire protection inspection. These inspections will assess the degree of fire safety, steer and promote licensee compliance, and, take enforcement action where appropriate. A Temporary Instruction for this program will be issued by 11/15/84. To make this program of inspection most effective: (a) A workshop for the inspection teams will be conducted in mid December with SC, NRR, IE and Regional participation to assure common understanding of the objectives, scope and technical issues. Followup workshops will be held as needed; (b) The fire protection inspections will utilize new guidance for enforcement actions (Enclosure 4); (c) The processing of current fire protection enforcement actions will be expedited; and (d) A referee will be established to promptly resolve significant differences between the inspection teams and licensees. 3. Upgrade regulatory documents and procedures to achieve an appropriate level of fire protection safety while maintaining consistency among plants. In particular: (a) Impose a standard fire protection condition (Enclosure 5) in each operating license (already being implemented); (b) Reevaluate all fire protection guidance for consistency with the SC recommendations and compare fire protection requirements for ORs and NTOLs, both under the auspices of the Working Group; (c) Develop appropriate revisions to the Standard Review Plan and Standard Technical Specifications by March 31, 1985; and (d) Designate the Director, Division of Engineering, NRR as the central point of contact for interoffice/region fire protection issues. 4. To assure timely and on-track completion of these recommended actions, the SC will review progress at least quarterly, make mid-course corrections if appropriate, and report to the EDO. Enclosure to GL 85-01, Re: Fire Protection Policy . William J. Dircks - 4 - OCT 26 1984 Discussion The recommended actions are grouped into three main areas dealing with (1) guidance to industry, (2) an expedited program of fire protection inspections, and (3) a general upgrading of regulatory documents to reach and maintain consistent fire protection safety. This discussion section will focus broadly on what the SC found during its deliberations to warrant the focus of these recommendations and will indicate how this satisfies the agenda of issues cited in your memo of September 13. Details on these issues are provided in the record of the SC deliberations contained in Enclosure 7. With regard to guidance to industry, the SC concludes that adequate technical guidance had been issued but that there were areas where confusion could arise. It was not clear where exemptions were needed, for example. However, a diligent reading of Appendix R and other staff documents did provide the basis for the satisfactory implementation of Appendix R at Calvert Cliffs. The SC concluded that it was neither needed nor appropriate to develop new guidance, rather, bringing current technical and implementation guidance together in one Generic Letter and make the SRP, Tech Specs, and licenses consistent would suffice. The Generic Letter makes clear (1) that extensions to the 50.48(c) schedules will no longer be granted, (2) that an expedited inspection program will be instituted to see what fire protection fixes are in place and give licensees the inspection team judgements on the acceptability of future modifications, and (3) that the licensee judgements must be backed by documented and valid analyses. The SC believes that this will demonstrate to the licensee what action he must take and what our inspections will look for. The Generic Letter notes that, although the 50.48(c) schedules will not be extended, the relative safety priorities of fire protection modifications need to be considered in the development of "living schedules." One item of guidance in the Generic Letter that had not been uniformly disseminated is that the QA applicable to fire protection features is that required by GDC-1. This would not attempt to backfit any QA requirements. Rather it would assure that future design, procurement, installation, testing and maintenance of fire protection features would receive high industrial quality attention. The SC believes that this initiative fully responds to the first three issues in your memo of September 13. Turning now to the inspection program, the SC found that the current inspections are generally satisfactory but that steps must be taken to indicate NRC's view of the importance of expediting implementation of Appendix R. These steps are to (1) speed up the inspection process, (2) develop a sound policy for fire protection enforcement actions, and (3) issue enforcement actions currently pending. These steps, in our view, would help expedite licensee compliance because it would raise industry's Enclosure to GL 85-01, Re: Fire Protection Policy . William J. Dircks - 5 - OCT 26 1984 awareness to NRC's resolve in this area and, more importantly, would allow the teams to judge the current direction (for licensees still designing or installing fixes) and advise the licensee on its acceptability. This should save both industry and staff resources in the long run. In the short run, that is 1985, the SC believes that adequate resources exist for the inspection teams (one for R-I, R-II and R-III, and one for R-IV/V) to be taken from regional staff, augmented by contractor, NRR, and IE assistance. While this would take a modest amount of reprogramming in the regional inspection program, we suggest that it's worth the effort to get Appendix R implementation behind us. Prior to the 1985 inspection, a several-day inspection team workshop would be held to discuss the inspection program, the technical issues, and reach a common understanding on acceptability of various configurations and required documentation. Since this workshop cannot solve all potential problems the inspection teams will encounter, a team at HQ would be set up to promptly resolve significant differences between the inspection personnel and the licensee. This referee team would be headed by NRR (SES level) and would have an NRR, an IE and a regional technical member. Their decision would be issued in one week and would be sent to all teams for their information. The SC believes that this program of expedited inspections, aimed at reaching ORs and NTOLs and to include at least one site from each licensee not previously subject to a fire protection inspection, coupled with denial of future schedular exemptions and a fire enforcement policy will result in a fair and uniform speed up of Appendix R compliance. Further, since the resource cost is believed to be modestly above the already-programed fire protection inspections, we believe the cost is well worth it and will even benefit industry by correcting false starts in Appendix R implementation where they are found. Although we found the current inspections adequate (fifth item in your memo of September 13), this program will continue to be focussed on safe shutdown, will be implemented more expeditiously, and will build on the resolution of other initiatives considered by the SC. A Temporary Instruction for this inspection program has been drafted and is undergoing final revisions It will be in final form by November 15, 1984 and will include the elements discussed above, for example, the team set up to resolve inspection differences with the licensee. Finally, the SC considered means to assure and maintain consistent levels of fire protection safety at all plants. The Working Group researched the guidance documents currently available and how these are applied to old and new plants. The SC discussed findings of the reviewers and inspectors who are close to the issues. As a result of this work, the SC found that the requirements for old and new plants were generally the same but that discrepancies do exist. The application of guidelines, both in the review process and the inspection process, leaves room for interpretation. The SC concluded that several steps needed to be taken in addition to those described above some of which were to assure and maintain consistency. Enclosure to GL 85-01, Re: Fire Protection Policy . William J. Dircks - 6 - OCT 26 1984 These steps are to develop and implement standard fire protection license conditions, Standard Review Plan, and Standard Tech Specs for all plants. The license condition developed for this is along the lines of the security plan and QA program (Enclosure 5). The Standard Review Plan should need minimum revision to assure that Appendix R is fully included. The Tech Specs, however, will require more research and development by the Working Group. We need to assure that the Tech Specs are soundly based to assure functioning of fire protection features but which require only those activities which are commensurate with other Tech Spec items in terms of importance to safety. As part of the above tasks, all fire protection guidance needs review and culling to assure that only a consistent and appropriate set remains. This complete set of guidance will be referenced in the Standard Review Plan revision. A last step in achieving uniform technical requirements is the SC recommendation to designate an office as responsible for awareness and resolution of interoffice/region fire protection issues. This is felt to be needed since current fire protection review is conducted within three divisions within NRR and one in IE. Although there is a lead branch responsibility, it is not always kept informed and involved. Therefore, the SC believes that the Director, Division of Engineering in NRR should be designated as the central point of contact. Conclusion The Fire Protection Policy Steering Committee concludes that the actions described above will accomplish the goals set forth in your memo of "expediting Appendix R compliance for older plants and assuring consistent levels of fire protection safety at all plants." We believe that these actions will facilitate industry implementation of Appendix R through the use of the "interpretations" and a consistent set of guidance yet will provide the necessary regulatory tools to guide, monitor, and, where appropriate, enforce this implementation process. We feel strongly that the actions we propose are synergistic and therefore all need to be completed to be most effective. The Fire Protection Policy Steering Committee has found the assignment to be challenging and rewarding. We would be pleased to brief you on our efforts at your earliest convenience. Fire Protection Policy Steering Committee Enclosure to GL 85-01, Re: Fire Protection Policy . William J. Dircks - 7 - OCT 26 1984 FIRE PROTECTION POLICY STEERING COMMITTEE J. Nelson Grace, Director Quality Assurance, Safeguards & Inspection Programs Office of Inspection and Enforcement Thomas T. Martin, Director Division of Engineering and Technical Programs Region I William J. Olmstead, Director and Chief Counsel Regulations Division Office of the Executive Legal Director John A. Olshinski, Director Division of Reactor Safety Region III Richard L. Spessard, Director Division of Reactor Safety Region III Richard H. Vollmer, Director Division of Engineering Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (Chairman) Enclosure to GL 85-01, Re: Fire Protection Policy . William J. Dircks - 8 - OCT 26 1984 Enclosures: 1. Memo to H. Denton et al on Review of NRC Fire Protection Policy and Programs. 2. Generic Letter on Fire Protection 3. Interpretations of Appendix R 4. Guidance for Enforcement Actions Concerning Fire Protection Requirements 5. Fire Protection License Condition 6. Appendix R Questions and Answers 7. Steering Committee Memoranda Enclosure to GL 85-01, Re: Fire Protection Policy
Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021