Event Notification Report for December 16, 1999
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Operations Center Event Reports For 12/15/1999 - 12/16/1999 ** EVENT NUMBERS ** 36460 36513 36514 36515 !!!!!!!!! THIS EVENT HAS BEEN RETRACTED. THIS EVENT HAS BEEN RETRACTED !!!!!!! +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ |Power Reactor |Event Number: 36460 | +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | FACILITY: BRUNSWICK REGION: 2 |NOTIFICATION DATE: 11/24/1999| | UNIT: [] [2] [] STATE: NC |NOTIFICATION TIME: 13:59[EST]| | RXTYPE: [1] GE-4,[2] GE-4 |EVENT DATE: 11/24/1999| +------------------------------------------------+EVENT TIME: 12:32[EST]| | NRC NOTIFIED BY: DAVID JENKINS |LAST UPDATE DATE: 12/15/1999| | HQ OPS OFFICER: JOHN MacKINNON +-----------------------------+ +------------------------------------------------+PERSON ORGANIZATION | |EMERGENCY CLASS: N/A |LEN WERT R2 | |10 CFR SECTION: | | |AIND 50.72(b)(2)(iii)(D) ACCIDENT MITIGATION | | |NLCO TECH SPEC LCO A/S | | | | | | | | +-----+----------+-------+--------+-----------------+--------+-----------------+ |UNIT |SCRAM CODE|RX CRIT|INIT PWR| INIT RX MODE |CURR PWR| CURR RX MODE | +-----+----------+-------+--------+-----------------+--------+-----------------+ | | | |2 N Y 100 Power Operation |100 Power Operation | | | | +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ EVENT TEXT +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | REACTOR CORE ISOLATION COOLING (RCIC) TURBINE TRIPPED ON HIGH EXHAUST | | PRESSURE DURING POST-MAINTENANCE TESTING. | | | | While rolling the turbine during post-maintenance testing of RCIC system for | | Unit 2, the turbine tripped on high exhaust pressure. The turbine trip is | | caused by either one of two instruments sensing a high turbine exhaust | | pressure (nominally 45 psi). Turbine exhaust pressure was not noted to be | | abnormally high on the control room instrumentation during this evolution. | | The licensee entered Technical Specification 3.7, which requires that the | | licensee return the RCIC system to service within 14 days or to shut down | | the unit. All emergency core cooling systems are fully operable. | | Maintenance and engineering personnel are investigating this problem with | | initial focus on the pressure sensing instrumentation. | | | | The NRC resident inspector was notified of this event by the licensee. | | | | *************** UPDATE AT 0918 ON 12/15/99 FROM CHARLES ELBERFELD TO LEIGH | | TROCINE *************** | | | | The licensee is retracting this event notification. The following text is a | | portion of a facsimile received from the licensee: | | | | "On November 24, 1999, at 0918 hours, the Reactor Core Isolation Cooling | | (RCIC) system was declared inoperable for scheduled maintenance/testing, | | which was to include static and dynamic testing of two RCIC system | | motor-operated valves as well as quarterly system operability surveillance | | testing required by the plant's technical specifications. The RCIC turbine | | was started and subsequently secured three times during the | | maintenance/testing evolution." | | | | "At approximately 1232 hours, the RCIC turbine was started again, and this | | time the RCIC turbine high exhaust pressure annunciator came in accompanied | | by a RCIC turbine trip. The RCIC system was considered to be inoperable for | | reasons that originated from other than maintenance or testing. Based on | | the information available at the time, the condition was assessed as | | reportable in accordance with 10 CFR 50.72(b)(2)(iii), and on November 24, | | 1999, at 1359 hours, notification was made to the NRC (Event No. 36460)." | | | | "This notification was made because RCIC, being a single train system, did | | not operate properly during maintenance testing of the system. At the time | | the notification was made, the cause of the malfunction had not been | | determined. To meet the 4-hour report time limit, the conservative decision | | was made to report the event." | | | | "Subsequently, it has been determined that the malfunction of the RCIC | | system was due to a condition which was introduced by the | | maintenance/testing activities. After the RCIC system had been started and | | operated in a test mode numerous times, a RCIC turbine exhaust line check | | valve began to bind to the point that, during the turbine start, the valve | | binding resulted in a pressure spike in the exhaust line of sufficient | | magnitude to cause a RCIC turbine trip. This condition was corrected and | | post-maintenance testing completed satisfactorily. The RCIC system was | | declared operable, and LCO A2-99-2468 was cancelled at 1639 on November 29, | | 1999." | | | | "Based on the sequence, this event is not reportable in accordance with 10 | | CFR 50.72 or 50.73. NUREG-1022, Revision 1, provides clarification of the | | reporting requirements contained within 10 CFR 50.72 and 50.73. | | Specifically, in discussions associated with events that alone could prevent | | fulfillment of a safety function, NUREG-1022, Revision 1, Section 3.3.3, | | provides the following example of a condition that is not reportable under | | these criteria: | | | | removal of a system or part of a system from service as part of a planned | | evolution for maintenance or | | surveillance testing when done in accordance with an approved procedure and | | the plant's [technical | | specifications] (unless a condition is discovered that could have prevented | | the system from performing its | | function)" | | | | "In this case, RCIC was properly removed from service for planned | | maintenance/testing under LCO A2-99-2468 and was not returned to service | | until operability was restored. The intent of the qualifying statement in | | NUREG- 1022 (i.e., unless a condition is discovered that could have | | prevented the system from performing its function) is to ensure that | | pre-existing operability concerns that are discovered during maintenance | | activities are reported. It is not intended to require reporting of | | conditions, introduced by the maintenance/testing activity, that are | | identified and corrected prior to returning the system to service. This is | | supported by Example 14 for this section of NUREG-1022. Example 14 deals | | with a two-train system in which the wrong lubricant is placed in [one] pump | | during maintenance activities. NUREG-1022 states that this condition would | | not be reportable if testing would clearly identify the error. This example | | is similar to the RCIC inoperability in that testing identified the problem | | prior to returning the system to service." | | | | "Carolina Power & Light Company has determined that this event does not meet | | the 10 CFR 50.72 or 10 CFR 50.73 reporting criteria, and the notification | | for Event Number 36460 is retracted." | | | | "Supporting information:" | | | | "10 CFR 50.72(b)(2) Four-hour reports. If not reported under paragraphs (a) | | or (b)(1) of this section, the licensee shall notify the NRC as soon as | | practical and in all cases, within four hours of the occurrence of any of | | the following: (iii) any event or condition that alone could have prevented | | the fulfillment of the safety function of structures or systems that are | | needed to: (A) shut down the reactor and maintain it in a safe shutdown | | condition, (B) remove residual heat, (C) control the release of radioactive | | material, or (D) mitigate the consequences of an accident." | | | | "10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) The licensee shall report: (v) Any event or condition | | that alone could have prevented the fulfillment of the safety function of | | structures or systems that are needed to: (A) shut down the reactor and | | maintain it in a safe shutdown condition, (B) remove residual heat, (C) | | control the release of radioactive material, or (D) mitigate the | | consequences of an accident." | | | | The licensee notified the NRC resident inspector. The NRC operations | | officer notified the R2DO (Boland). | +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ |General Information or Other |Event Number: 36513 | +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | REP ORG: WISCONSIN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY |NOTIFICATION DATE: 12/15/1999| |LICENSEE: K-RAY |NOTIFICATION TIME: 17:54[EST]| | CITY: KENOSHA REGION: 3 |EVENT DATE: 12/15/1999| | COUNTY: STATE: WI |EVENT TIME: [CST]| |LICENSE#: 48-16729-01 AGREEMENT: N |LAST UPDATE DATE: 12/15/1999| | DOCKET: |+----------------------------+ | |PERSON ORGANIZATION | | |GARY SHEAR R3 | | |KEIN RAMSEY (FAX) NMSS | +------------------------------------------------+ | | NRC NOTIFIED BY: KJELL JOHANSEN | | | HQ OPS OFFICER: FANGIE JONES | | +------------------------------------------------+ | |EMERGENCY CLASS: N/A | | |10 CFR SECTION: | | |CDEG 21.21(c)(3)(i) DEFECTS/NONCOMPLIANCE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ EVENT TEXT +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | K-RAY 706P SOURCE HOLDER DEVELOPED CRACK | | | | The licensee discovered a crack, about 2-3 inches in length, in the K-Ray | | 706P source holder, possibly in a weld. The gauge, containing a 10-mCi | | Cs-137 source, is in a radioactive labeled room under a coal pipe at the | | Pleasant Prairie Plant, and it has been wrapped with plastic and labeled | | with radioactive stickers. K-Ray has been notified and will replace the | | gauge before the end of the year. A 30-day written report will follow. | | | | (Call the NRC operations officer for a contact telephone number.) | +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ |Research Reactor |Event Number: 36514 | +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | FACILITY: UNIV OF MICHIGAN |NOTIFICATION DATE: 12/15/1999| | RXTYPE: 2000 KW POOL |NOTIFICATION TIME: 21:56[EST]| | COMMENTS: |EVENT DATE: 12/14/1999| | |EVENT TIME: [EST]| | |LAST UPDATE DATE: 12/15/1999| | CITY: ANN ARBOR REGION: 3 +-----------------------------+ | COUNTY: WASHTENAW STATE: MI |PERSON ORGANIZATION | |LICENSE#: R-28 AGREEMENT: N |GARY SHEAR R3 | | DOCKET: 05000002 |THEODORE MICHAELS NRR | +------------------------------------------------+ | | NRC NOTIFIED BY: CHRISTOPHER BECKER | | | HQ OPS OFFICER: FANGIE JONES | | +------------------------------------------------+ | |EMERGENCY CLASS: N/A | | |10 CFR SECTION: | | |NLTR LICENSEE 24 HR REPORT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ EVENT TEXT +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION VIOLATION - 24 HOUR REPORT | | | | "This is the report on a violation of Technical Specification 3.2.1. Due to | | the incorrect connection of the high voltage to the compensated voltage | | connection of a compensated wide range ion chamber, the Log N Channel | | required in Table 3.1, Required Safety Channels, was inoperable during the | | reactor startup on 14 December 1999. Review of the power level indication | | from the other nuclear instrumentation channels shows that no limiting | | safety system settings were approached during the reactor startup. | | | | "Indications from the operable nuclear instruments and temperature system | | indicate that no limiting safety system settings were approached. | | Determination of the response of the period portion of the Log N system | | compared to the periods derived from other properly responding nuclear | | instrument channels indicates that the period circuit was measuring periods | | of similar magnitude and that the 30-second period for reactor control rod | | withdrawal inhibit was not challenged." | | | | There were three root causes identified: (1) The Log N circuit and the | | linear level circuit are both compensated ion chambers. However, the bridge | | connections are opposite, and the operators used the linear connections to | | make up the Log N connections. (2) The operators knew or should have known | | that an abnormal reading of the Log N circuit was possible after | | maintenance, and (3) the reactor startup procedure specifies that operators | | are to "Hold" power at 500 kW to perform the checks, but it has become | | acceptable to slowly move through the 500 kW point and record the reading. | | Also, the calorimetric procedure specifies that after a 1 MW calorimetric, | | the Log N channel should indicate 40-100% (it indicated 25%). | | | | The reactor was shut down from full power (2 MW) and will not be restarted | | for sustained operation until an operational review of this reportable | | occurrence and other non-reportable events is made and presented to the | | Safety Review Committee (SRC). An outside review of recent operations is | | being sought and is hoped to be completed prior to requesting permission | | from the Director and the SRC for sustained operation. | | | | The following other measures are planned: Labeling of the cable connections | | for all the nuclear instrument detectors will be reviewed and improved; | | possible design changes to make the connectors have different | | configurations. Operational training will be given on procedures, and | | practical performances will be evaluated. | | | | The licensee notified the NRC Project Manager (Theodore Michaels) and NRC | | Inspector (Thomas Dragoun). | | | | (Call the NRC operations officer for a contact telephone number.) | +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ |Power Reactor |Event Number: 36515 | +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | FACILITY: TURKEY POINT REGION: 2 |NOTIFICATION DATE: 12/16/1999| | UNIT: [3] [] [] STATE: FL |NOTIFICATION TIME: 01:01[EST]| | RXTYPE: [3] W-3-LP,[4] W-3-LP |EVENT DATE: 12/15/1999| +------------------------------------------------+EVENT TIME: 23:25[EST]| | NRC NOTIFIED BY: WILSON |LAST UPDATE DATE: 12/16/1999| | HQ OPS OFFICER: LEIGH TROCINE +-----------------------------+ +------------------------------------------------+PERSON ORGANIZATION | |EMERGENCY CLASS: N/A |ANN BOLAND R2 | |10 CFR SECTION: | | |APRE 50.72(b)(2)(vi) OFFSITE NOTIFICATION | | | | | | | | | | | +-----+----------+-------+--------+-----------------+--------+-----------------+ |UNIT |SCRAM CODE|RX CRIT|INIT PWR| INIT RX MODE |CURR PWR| CURR RX MODE | +-----+----------+-------+--------+-----------------+--------+-----------------+ |3 N Y 100 Power Operation |100 Power Operation | | | | | | | +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ EVENT TEXT +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | OFFSITE NOTIFICATION REGARDING A BUNKER-C OIL SPILL AT THE FOSSIL UNITS | | | | The following text is a portion of a facsimile received from the licensee: | | | | "Units 1 and 2 (fossil) are notifying [the Department of Environmental | | Resource Management (DERM)] of [a] Bunker-C oil spill on [a] permeable | | surface. [It is] estimated that 100 - 150 gallons of bunker C [are] | | contained by an earth/rock berm around the fuel tank." | | | | The licensee notified the NRC resident inspector. | +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021