The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission is in the process of rescinding or revising guidance and policies posted on this webpage in accordance with Executive Order 14151 Ending Radical and Wasteful Government DEI Programs and Preferencing, and Executive Order 14168 Defending Women From Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government. In the interim, any previously issued diversity, equity, inclusion, or gender-related guidance on this webpage should be considered rescinded that is inconsistent with these Executive Orders.

Health Physics Questions and Answers - Question 40

Question 40: Assume a licensee has defined its compliance year as January 1, 1993 to December 31, 1993. What is the mechanism to change its definition of year? For example, the licensee wants to monitor from January 31, 1994 to January 30, 1995, how should it account for the lost days January 1 - 30, 1994? Is it acceptable to prorate the doses?

Answer: No. The question refers to the definition of "year" in 10 CFR 20.1003. The licensee is not allowed to make the one-step change as postulated in the example in the question because that change involves omitting certain days. Omitting days, even with dose proration, is not allowed. However, the license could accomplish the desired change in two steps, one step in each of two consecutive years, that would give a "year" beginning 1/31 of one calendar year and ending 1/30 of the following year. The first step, using the example, would be a change, at the beginning of 1993, to a "year" of 1/1/93 to 1/30/94 (13 months). The second step would be a change, at the beginning of 1994, to a "year" of 1/31/94 to 1/30/95. This two-step change meets the requirement of "years" that begin in January with no day omitted or duplicated in consecutive years.

(Reference: 10 CFR 20.1003)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, December 01, 2017