Posting of Entrances to a Large Room or Building as a Radiation Area
See the letter from J. P. O'Reilly to E. E. Utley (Carolina Power and Light Company) dated January 27, 1984.
The NRC position is that posting practices for a large room or building must adequately alert personnel to the presence of radiation areas such that they may minimize exposures they receive. Posting only entrances to reactor buildings does not provide personnel with sufficient information for them to be able to minimize exposures from the radiation areas within the reactor building. The health physics position was written in the context of 10 CFR 20.1, 20.6, 20.202, and 20.203, but it also applies to the "new" 10 CFR 20 Part 20, Sections 20.1003, 20.1006, 20.1101 and 20.1902.
In a letter dated June 15, 1981, NRC stated that Violation D of Inspection Report Nos. 50-325 / 80-45 and 50-324 / 80-43, regarding radiation area posting of reactor buildings was under review and that a final decision would be issued at a later date.
On October 7, 1981, in a letter to NRR, a licensee requested a written interpretation of the requirements set forth in the definition of a radiation area in 10 CFR 20.202 (b) (2) [or 10 CFR 20.1003] and the requirements for posting of a radiation area in 10 CFR 20.203 (b) [or 10 CFR 1902 (a)].
That request was subsequently forwarded to Region II for evaluation and action. The licensee's request that Violation D be withdrawn and a request for interpretation were evaluated by the NRC staff. The NRC position is that posting practices must adequately alert personnel to the presence of radiation areas such that they may minimize exposures.
The practice of posting only the entrances to a reactor building does not provide personnel with sufficient information for them to be able to minimize exposures from the radiation areas within the reactor building.
The intent of 10 CFR 20.202 (b) (2) and 20.203 (b) [or 10 CFR 20.1003 and 20.1902 (a), respectively] is to alert personnel to the presence of radiation and to aid them in minimizing exposures. NRC realizes that circumstances of each case must be evaluated to assure that posting practices do not detract from this intent by: (1) desensitizing personnel through over-posting, or (2) failing to sufficiently alert personnel to the presence and location of radiation areas.
Thus, radiation area postings should warn individuals in the vicinity of radiation areas of specific radiological conditions in their immediate vicinity. By the same token, it is also considered outside of the regulations and counter-productive if substantial areas which are not radiation areas are posted as such.
Since the regulations do not provide implementing details such as whether a room or building containing a radiation area may be posted at the entrance or whether every discrete radiation area must be posted, the following is used as guidance: Posting the entrances to a very large room or building is inappropriate if most of the area is not a radiation area and only discrete areas or individual rooms actually meet the criteria for a radiation area. If discrete areas or rooms within a large area or building can be reasonably posted to alert individuals to radiation areas, these discrete areas or rooms should be posted individually.
The interpretation is the official NRC staff position, but as such, is not binding on the Commission. Such binding interpretations can only be issued by the Office of the General Counsel pursuant to 10 CFR 20.6 [or 10 CFR 20.1006]. The office of the General Counsel normally refers technical matters such as this issue to the NRC staff for resolution. The licensee's letter of October 7, 1981, enumerated six reasons for posting the entrances to buildings as radiation areas instead of discrete areas within the buildings. None of the reasons were sufficient individually or collectively to effectively aid workers in minimizing their exposure. They do not provide a substitute for the information or worker awareness provided by a posted sign that identifies the presence and approximate boundary of specific radiation areas and do not support ALARA as discussed in 10 CFR 20.1 (c) [or 10 CFR 20.1101 (b)].
NRC continues to maintain that most of the area within the reactor building fails to meet the criteria for a radiation area. Consequently, posting just the entrances to the reactor building does not meet the intent of the regulations.
Regulatory references: 10 CFR 20.202, 10 CFR 20.203, 10 CFR 20.1003, 10 CFR 20.1902
Subject codes: 4.2, 4.7
Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, October 02, 2017