Information Notice No. 90-57: Substandard, Refurbished Potter & Brumfield Relays Represented As New
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555 September 5, 1990 Information Notice No. 90-57: SUBSTANDARD, REFURBISHED POTTER & BRUMFIELD RELAYS MISREPRESENTED AS NEW Addressees: All holders of operating licenses or construction permits for nuclear power reactors. Purpose: This information notice is intended to alert addressees to the discovery of rotary, non-latching type relays, originally manufactured by Potter & Brumfield (P&B) of Princeton, Indiana, that have been apparently modified and/or refurbished and that have been found to be materially and functionally substandard, such that they may not operate as required. The affected relays include, but may not be limited to, P&B types MDR-138-8, MDR-173-1, MDR-134-1, and MDR-142-1. It is expected that recipients will review this information for applicability to their facilities. However, suggestions contained in this information notice do not constitute NRC requirements; therefore, no specific action or written response is required. Description of Circumstances: Carolina Power and Light Company's (CP&L's) Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant recently received a shipment of 22 P&B MDR-type relays. Although these were purchased from Spectronics, Inc., of Mobile, Alabama, an authorized distributor of P&B relays, the shipment was received directly from their supplier, Stokley Enterprises of Norfolk, Virginia. CP&L purchased the relays as commercial-grade items to be dedicated for use in the emergency diesel generator safety bus sequencer system at Shearon Harris. CP&L expected Spectronics to supply new relays from P&B, although the purchase order did not so state. CP&L was alerted to potential quality problems when the relays were received much sooner than the normal 10 to 12 weeks from P&B. Discrepancies were identified by CP&L during receiving inspection, during subsequent examination at Shearon Harris by NRC staff and a P&B technical representative, and later during inspection and testing at the P&B factory, observed by NRC staff. The relays were improperly adjusted, lacked lubrication, and all failed one or more of the P&B tests. They contained assortments of nonstandard and/or substandard parts and obsolete parts used by P&B or its predecessor, Magnetic Devices, Inc. The parts were assembled in incorrect, non-original configurations. These conditions, indicative of refurbishment, are listed in Attachment 1 to this information notice. Discussion: Through a continuing series of inspections at licensee and vendor facilities, the NRC staff has learned that Spectronics, Inc., has supplied apparently 9008290095 . IN 90-57 September 5, 1990 Page 2 of 2 modified and/or refurbished P&B MDR-type relays that are materially and functionally substandard directly and/or indirectly to (1) at least three nuclear plants, including Shearon Harris, Watts Bar, and Sequoyah; (2) various vendors to nuclear plants; (3) at least one dedicator of commercial-grade components for nuclear plants, Nutherm International (Mount Vernon, Illinois); and (4) possibly one or more electrical equipment fabricators for installation in relay and switchgear panels for nuclear plants. These apparently modified and/or refurbished P&B-type relays were obtained directly or indirectly from either Stokley Enterprises or The Martin Company of Chesapeake, Virginia. Stokley Enterprises and The Martin Company may have supplied such P&B-type relays, and various other types of modified and/or refurbished electrical components from other manufacturers, to distributors of electrical equipment who deal directly or indirectly with nuclear utilities. This information notice requires no specific action or written response. If you have any questions about the information in this notice, please contact one of the technical contacts listed below or the appropriate NRC regional office. Charles E. Rossi, Director Division of Operational Events Assessment Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Technical Contacts: K. R. Naidu, NRR (301) 492-0980 S. D. Alexander, NRR (301) 492-0995 Attachments: 1. Conditions Indicative of Substandard/Refurbished Relays 2. List of Recently Issued Information Notices . Attachment 1 IN 90-57 September 5, 1990 Page 1 of 1 CONDITIONS INDICATIVE OF SUBSTANDARD/REFURBISHED RELAYS The following conditions, observed with P&B MDR-type relays supplied by Stokley Enterprises and/or The Martin Company through Spectronics, Inc., and/or Nutherm International, may be observed on similar relays supplied through various other distributors and dealers and are indicative of substandard refurbishment: 1. Non-standard reddish-brown paint used to stake the nuts securing the motor and rotor assemblies (paint may be wet and adhering to the carton) 2. Sloppy coil lead solder joints at terminal strips with possible wicking 3. Painted relay base grommets (normally clear plastic) for coil leads 4. Terminal strips fastened with eyelets (discontinued in 1967) instead of rivets currently used by P&B 5. Grey painted rivets fastening the terminal strip to the relay housing where original P&B relays have unpainted rivets 6. Field termination screws (supplied with the relays) shipped in brown paper bags instead of heat-sealed, plastic bags 7. Cartons differing from original P&B cartons in color and labelling and relays packed with bubble wrap instead of wrapped in a plastic bag and packed in styrofoam as done by P&B 8. Apparently silk-screened nameplates, clearly different from original 9. Repainted inner bell-surface and relay base marks indicating prior use 10. Date codes and inspection and testing stamps missing or inconsistent with relay type (as determined by comparison with P&B production records), indicating interchanged relay caps 11. Cap nuts (discontinued in 1977) on rotor and motor assembly bolts, instead of currently used hex nuts, that are not torqued to P&B specifications 12. Incorrect shaft-relay cover clearance, incorrect rotor shaft end play, and lack of bearing lubricant 13. Coil lead insulation color inconsistent with that of current P&B relays 14. Orange paint (not used by P&B after 1972) on tops of rotor shafts 15. Slots on tops of rotor shafts not painted black as currently required 16. Nonuniform numbers stamped on the contact decks, indicating decks made up from various relays 17. High potential test failure on coils and between contacts and contact sections 18. Functional test failure - actuation above P&B-specified "maximum operate" [pick-up] voltage and/or drop-out below minimum drop-out voltage 19. Widely varying coil winding resistance among relays, indicating manufacture during various periods of time 20. Incorrect coil - one 125-VDC relay found with 200-VDC coil. Coil had twice the specified winding resistance and relay actuated at high, out-of-specification operate voltage. .ENDEND
Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021