Information Notice No. 82-56: Robertshaw Thermostatic Flow Control Valves
SINNS No.: 6835 IN 82-56 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555 December 30, 1982 Information Notice No. 82-56: ROBERTSHAW THERMOSTATIC FLOW CONTROL VALVES Addressees: All nuclear power reactor facilities holding an operating license (OL) or construction permit (CP). Purpose: This information notice is provided as a notification of a potentially significant problem pertaining to Robertshaw Thermostatic Flow Control Valves. No specific action is required in response to this information notice, but the manufacturer in 10 CFR Part 21 correspondence with the NRC has requested that the NRC advise the nuclear industry of a potential problem with application of three versions of flow adjustment subassemblies, since substantially identical units are sold commercially and may have been purchased through distributors without identification that the end use is in a nuclear power plant. Description of Circumstances: Robertshaw Thermostatic Flow Control Valves are widely used for temperature control in fluid systems. Among other uses, Robertshaw has supplied Model 1284 and Model 1285 valves to manufacturers of diesel engines which power emergency generators for nuclear power plants. Details of the systems may vary, but in general, the engine cooling fluid flow path is either directed through a cooler or diverted around it by modulating action of the valve in response to coolant temperature sensed at the valve inlet. The valve stroke is set by a nut on a threaded stem. If that nut backs off, the temperature setpoint is significantly lowered. Running a diesel engine with excessively low coolant temperature may lead to engine damage. The valve stem nut in the original design was staked in place at the factory on assembly. In 1977 a customer reported that the nut on one assembly had completely disengaged; subsequently, the same customer reported a similar occurrence on another assembly. Manufacturing records showed that both assemblies had been made on the same day by a single mechanic. To provide better assurance that the nut would stay in place, the manufacturer changed the assembly procedure to lock the nut by soldering with lead-tin solder. Recently, the manufacturer became aware that some "corrosion inhibitors" used in closed cooling, water systems aggressively attack lead-tin solders (IE Circular 80-11). Based on this information, the manufacturer further revised assembly procedures to use of a castellated nut and cotter pin, eliminating use of lead-tin solder. 8212060354 . IN 82-56 December 30, 1982 Page 2 of 3 Since there has been only the one reported failure, none of the above described assembly modifications were considered by the manufacturer to be of sufficient significance to warrant production retrofit, except for valves specifically identified as destined for use on emergency diesel generators for nuclear power plants. The manufacturer believes that many valves in service have been assembled by one of the now-obsolete techniques. Because of the wide distribution and use of these valves, some may be in use in safety-significant applications. This in itself may not be a problem since, depending on use, the postulated failure mode may be acceptably "fail safe." Another design feature of the subject valves is the use of a modified "O" ring to control bypass leakage within the valve when the valve is positioned to divert flow from the cooler. A cylindrical valve plug controls the fluid flow out of one or both of the discharge ports by moving axially. The "O" ring floats in a groove in the valve body web and is around the valve plug. It limits bypass leakage to about 1 percent of full flow. Thermal element (valve actuator) power available to position the valve plug is small, and the dimensions of the "O" ring and the groove are such that there is no preload on the "O" ring. Instead, the "O" ring has been cut and a small section of the ring has been removed to assure that the ends do not make contact. In one instance, contamination of the coolant by diesel fuel, caused by a faulty fuel injector, resulted in swelling of the "O" ring, which prevented normal movement of the valve plug. Evaluation of this event resulted in the manufacturer recommending elimination of the "O" ring for emergency diesels in nuclear power. The basis for this recommendation is the stated practice of maintaining the engine at an elevated temperature at all times that it is in a standby condition. Therefore, the slightly increased bypass flow through the cooler is considered to be acceptable during the startup transient. As soon as the engine picks up load and begins to reject heat, the valve opens to allow partial flow through the cooler, and the "bypass" flow becomes unimportant. The validity of this analysis has been confirmed by the engine manufacturer. A similar situation exists with other applications of the subject valve. Depending on circumstances a licensee may or may not decide that prudence dictates replacement of the stroke adjustment assembly and/or removal of the split "O" ring. . IN 82-56 December 30, 1982 Page 3 of 3 If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact the Regional Administrator of the appropriate NRC Regional Office, or this office. Edward L. Jordan, Director Division of Engineering and Quality Assurance Office of Inspection and Enforcement Technical Contact: J. B. Henderson 301-492-9454 Attachment: List of Recently Issued IE Information Notices
Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021
Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, March 09, 2021