Part 21 Report - 1995-078
ACCESSION #: 9502220192
Boeing Computer Services
P.O. Box 24346
Seattle, WA 98124-0346
February 13, 1995
G-1151-RSO-95-079
Document Control Desk
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Washington, D.C. 20555
BOEING
Reference: a) Boeing Letter G-1151-RSO-92-365 dated August 31,
1992; R. S. Orr to the NRC Operations Center
b) NRC Letter Docket No. 99901227 dated August 12, 1992;
L. J. Norrholm to R. S. Orr; Subject: Response to 10
CFR 21 Inquiry
Dear Sir or Madam:
In accordance with the reference correspondence and 10 CFR 21, Boeing is
sending the NRC the attached error notice(s) received from our former
software suppliers. Because of unknown current addresses, the following
former customers were not notified:
Reactor Controls, Inc.
Echo Energy Consultants, Inc.
Nuclear Applications and Systems Analysis Company (Japan)
Nuclear Power Services
Error notices have been sent to our other former customers.
Very truly yours,
R. S. Orr
Nuclear Administrator
G-1151 M/S 7A-33
(206) 865-6248
Attachment(s): GTICES Program Report Form No. 95.02
Georgia Tech Computer Aided Structural Engineering Center
Georgia Institute of Technology
School of Civil & Environmental Engineering
Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0355
USA
404-894-2260
February 3, 1995 404-894-8014 FAX
Attention: Nuclear Administrator
Boeing Computer Services
P. O. Box 24346, M/S 7A-33
Seattle, Washington 98124-0346
RE: GT STRUDL
Dear Sir or Madam:
Enclosed please find a copy of the GTICES PROGRAM REPORT FORM No. 95.02
and a VENDOR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM. Please sign and return the VENDOR
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM to acknowledge receipt of the GTICES Program Report.
Thank you for reviewing the Program Report and for returning the
Acknowledgement Form.
Best regards,
CASE Center
Catherine Lee
Configuration Control Manager
CL/apw
Enclosures
GTSTRUDL Program Report Form
GPRF No.:
DATE:
FROM: Computer-Aided Structural Engineering Center
Georgia Institute of Technology
Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0355
SEVERITY LEVEL:
URGENT Problem results in incorrect answers which may not be
apparent or job aborts and cannot be recovered within
the session or job.
SERIOUS Problem results in incorrect answers which are
obvious or problem prevents completion of a
particular user's task.
X MINOR Problem can be worked around or problem poses high
frustration factor.
INFORMATIVE Documentation error, program usage tip, user
inconveniences.
Date Problem Confirmed February 3, 1995
Date Notification Sent
Computers All
Operating System All
Version All 91.01 and later
Target Release for Correction 95.02
Manager, ASD
Signature Title
R & D Division
Michael H. Swanger
Typed or Printed Name Date of Signature
Signature Title
Professional Services Division
Typed or Printed Name Date/of/Signature
Rev. 2.2
GTSTRUDL Program Report Form
(Continued)
GPRF No.:
DATE:
DESCRIPTION:
The DAMPING RATIOS command given immediately prior to the ASSEMBLE FOR
DYNAMICS, DYNAMIC ANALYSIS EIGENVALUE, or DYNAMIC ANALYSIS MODE
SUPERPOSITION commands will prevent the computation and assembly of the
stiffness and mass damping matrices. This condition will furthermore
result in the computation of 0.0 values for the modal damping ratios by
the COMPUTE MODAL DAMPING command. The stiffness and mass damping ratios
are computed and assembled as a result of damping factor values specified
in any or all of the following commands: CONSTANTS, JOINT RELEASES,
INERTIA OF JOINTS, DAMPING PROPORTIONAL.
The following sequence of commands illustrates this situation:
DAMPING RATIOS 0.05 10
ASSEMBLE FOR DYNAMICS $ No damping matrices assembled
PERFORM EIGENVALUE ANALYSIS
DYNAMIC PARAMETERS
RESPONSE DAMPING INPUT 1.0 STIFFNESS 1.0 MASS 1.0
END
COMPUTE MODAL DAMPING RATIOS $ 0 damping ratios computed
Work-around:
Position the DAMPING RATIOS command immediately before the COMPUTE
MODAL DAMPING RATIOS command.
Applicable sections of the User's Manual:
Specification of Damping Properties -- Section 2.4.3.4, Volume 3
Rev. 2.2
*** END OF DOCUMENT ***
Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021