Event Notification Report for October 26, 2001
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Operations Center Event Reports For 10/25/2001 - 10/26/2001 ** EVENT NUMBERS ** 38372 38425 38426 38427 38428 . +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ |General Information or Other |Event Number: 38372 | +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | REP ORG: CALIFORNIA RADIATION CONTROL PRGM |NOTIFICATION DATE: 10/10/2001| |LICENSEE: LEIGHTON AND ASSOCIATES |NOTIFICATION TIME: 11:19[EDT]| | CITY: IRVINE REGION: 4 |EVENT DATE: 10/08/2001| | COUNTY: STATE: CA |EVENT TIME: [PDT]| |LICENSE#: 3109-30 AGREEMENT: Y |LAST UPDATE DATE: 10/25/2001| | DOCKET: |+----------------------------+ | |PERSON ORGANIZATION | | |LINDA HOWELL R4 | | |FRED BROWN NMSS | +------------------------------------------------+ | | NRC NOTIFIED BY: KENT PRENDERGAST | | | HQ OPS OFFICER: BOB STRANSKY | | +------------------------------------------------+ | |EMERGENCY CLASS: NON EMERGENCY | | |10 CFR SECTION: | | |NAGR AGREEMENT STATE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ EVENT TEXT +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | AGREEMENT STATE REPORT | | | | "Licensee reported that a Troxler 3440 portable gauge containing 10 mCi of | | cesium-137 and 50 mCi of americium-241:beryllium, in sealed sources, was | | stolen from one of their technician's pick-up while being kept overnight at | | the technician's home in Hemet. The gauge was in its transport case, locked | | down in the bed of the vehicle with a 'shell.' | | | | "The gauge was stolen sometime after being parked at the technician' s home | | on the evening of 10-8-01. | | | | "The stolen gauge was a Troxler 3440, S/N 14409." | | | | * * * * UPDATE ON 10/25/01 AT 1520 ET BY ROBERT GREGER TAKEN BY MACKINNON * | | * * * | | | | The gauge was recovered on 10/23/01 after a reward was offered for the | | recovery of the gauge. No damage to the gauge. R4DO (Bill Johnson) and | | NMSS (Brian Smith) notified. | +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ . +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ |Power Reactor |Event Number: 38425 | +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | FACILITY: FARLEY REGION: 2 |NOTIFICATION DATE: 10/25/2001| | UNIT: [1] [] [] STATE: AL |NOTIFICATION TIME: 02:07[EDT]| | RXTYPE: [1] W-3-LP,[2] W-3-LP |EVENT DATE: 10/25/2001| +------------------------------------------------+EVENT TIME: 00:25[CDT]| | NRC NOTIFIED BY: FUCICH |LAST UPDATE DATE: 10/25/2001| | HQ OPS OFFICER: FANGIE JONES +-----------------------------+ +------------------------------------------------+PERSON ORGANIZATION | |EMERGENCY CLASS: NON EMERGENCY |JOHN MONNINGER R2 | |10 CFR SECTION: | | |AMED 50.72(b)(3)(xii) OFFSITE MEDICAL | | | | | | | | | | | +-----+----------+-------+--------+-----------------+--------+-----------------+ |UNIT |SCRAM CODE|RX CRIT|INIT PWR| INIT RX MODE |CURR PWR| CURR RX MODE | +-----+----------+-------+--------+-----------------+--------+-----------------+ |1 N N 0 Refueling |0 Refueling | | | | | | | +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ EVENT TEXT +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | WORKER OVERCOME BY HEAT TAKEN TO LOCAL MEDICAL FACILITY | | | | The licensee evacuated a worker who was working in containment and was | | overcome by the heat. The worker was transported using the utility's | | emergency vehicle. There was a small area of contamination on the worker's | | neck which was decontaminated during the trip to the hospital. The worker | | was not contaminated when admitted to the hospital. | | | | The licensee intends to notify the NRC Resident Inspector. | +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ . +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ |Other Nuclear Material |Event Number: 38426 | +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | REP ORG: PRAP ROCK INDUSTRIES |NOTIFICATION DATE: 10/25/2001| |LICENSEE: PRAP ROCK INDUSTRIES |NOTIFICATION TIME: 12:16[EDT]| | CITY: EWING REGION: 1 |EVENT DATE: 10/24/2001| | COUNTY: STATE: NJ |EVENT TIME: 22:30[EDT]| |LICENSE#: 29-19707-01 AGREEMENT: N |LAST UPDATE DATE: 10/25/2001| | DOCKET: |+----------------------------+ | |PERSON ORGANIZATION | | |R1 IRC TEAM MANAGER R1 | | |BRAIN SMITH NMSS | +------------------------------------------------+ | | NRC NOTIFIED BY: WAYNE BYARD | | | HQ OPS OFFICER: JOHN MacKINNON | | +------------------------------------------------+ | |EMERGENCY CLASS: NON EMERGENCY | | |10 CFR SECTION: | | |BAB1 20.2201(a)(1)(i) LOST/STOLEN LNM>1000X | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ EVENT TEXT +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | STOLEN TROXLER ASPHALT DENSITY GAUGE CONTAINING 10 MILLICURIES OF | | CESIUM-137 | | | | Prap Industries was performing work on a newly paved road which was closed | | to traffic at the intersection of Interstate 95 and Route 31 located in | | Ewing, NJ. A Prap Rock Industries employee placed the Troxler gauge, Model | | # 4640B, in a cart and moved the cart next to a tree and went off to perform | | other duties. When the person returned, time unknown how long the person | | was away from the unattained gauge, he discovered that the gauge and cart | | were missing. This individual immediately notified the onsite New Jersey | | State Troopers that the gauge was missing. A search of the area was | | conducted with not results in finding either the gauge or the cart. NRC | | Region 1 individual was notified of this event by the licensee. | +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ . +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ |Fuel Cycle Facility |Event Number: 38427 | +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | FACILITY: PADUCAH GASEOUS DIFFUSION PLANT |NOTIFICATION DATE: 10/25/2001| | RXTYPE: URANIUM ENRICHMENT FACILITY |NOTIFICATION TIME: 23:19[EDT]| | COMMENTS: 2 DEMOCRACY CENTER |EVENT DATE: 10/25/2001| | 6903 ROCKLEDGE DRIVE |EVENT TIME: 10:00[CDT]| | BETHESDA, MD 20817 (301)564-3200 |LAST UPDATE DATE: 10/25/2001| | CITY: PADUCAH REGION: 3 +-----------------------------+ | COUNTY: McCRACKEN STATE: KY |PERSON ORGANIZATION | |LICENSE#: GDP-1 AGREEMENT: Y |BRENT CLAYTON R3 | | DOCKET: 0707001 |E. WILLIAM BRACH NMSS | +------------------------------------------------+CHARLES MILLER IRO | | NRC NOTIFIED BY: T. E. WHITE | | | HQ OPS OFFICER: JOHN MacKINNON | | +------------------------------------------------+ | |EMERGENCY CLASS: NON EMERGENCY | | |10 CFR SECTION: | | |NBNL RESPONSE-BULLETIN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ EVENT TEXT +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | NRC BULLETIN 91-01 24 HOUR NOTIFICATION | | | | At 1000, on 10/25/01, the Plant Superintendent (PSS) was notified that the | | independent verification for selecting the correct cylinder for washing was | | performed by the same operator, violating NCSA 400-002. This NCSA states | | that a second person, independent of the first person, verify that the | | correct cylinder is being washed. The purpose of this requirement is to | | preclude washing an unintended cylinder. | | | | The cylinder which was being washed was a non-fissile cylinder. | | | | SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE OF EVENTS: | | | | Double contingency for cylinder was operation is based on selecting the | | correct cylinder to wash. A cylinder was on the washstand that was not | | verified, by two independent people, to be an approved cylinder. The | | cylinder was subsequently verified independently to be non-fissile. | | | | POTENTIAL CRITICALITY PATHWAYS INVOLVED (BRIEF SCENARIO(S) OF HOW | | CRITICALITY COULD OCCUR: | | | | In order for a criticality to be possible, a cylinder would have to be | | washed which contained greater than a critical mass of fissile material. | | | | CONTROLLED PARAMETERS (MASS, MODERATION, GEOMETRY, CONCENTRATION, ETC.): | | | | Independent verification of correct cylinder. | | | | ESTIMATED AMOUNT, ENRICHMENT, FORM OF LICENSED MATERIAL (INCLUDE PROCESS | | LIMIT AND % WORST CASE CRITICAL MASS): | | | | This cylinder contained non-fissile material. | | | | NUCLEAR CRITICALITY SAFETY CONTROL(S) OR CONTROL SYSTEM(S) AND DESCRIPTION | | OF THE FAILURES OR DEFICIENCIES: | | | | Double contingency is maintained by implementing two controls to ensure the | | correct cylinder is washed. | | | | The first leg of double contingency is based on ensuring that the cylinder | | selected for washing has been approved. The cylinder met the criteria and | | was approved for washing. This control was not violated. | | | | The second leg of double contingency is based on independent verification | | that the cylinder, after being put on the washstand but prior to being | | washed, is an approved cylinder. Since the independent verification was | | done incorrectly the control was violated and double contingency was not | | maintained. | | | | Since double contingency is based on two controls on one parameter, double | | contingency was not maintained. | | | | CORRECTIVE ACTIONS TO RESTORE SAFETY SYSTEMS AND WHEN EACH WAS IMPLEMENTED: | | | | Continue processing the cylinder according to CP4-CU-CH2110. (A second | | person has independently verified that the cylinder washed was an approved | | cylinder according to step 8.4.3, of procedure CP4-CU-CH2110.) | | | | The NRC Senior Resident Inspector was notified of this event by the | | certificate holder. | +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ . +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ |Fuel Cycle Facility |Event Number: 38428 | +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | FACILITY: PADUCAH GASEOUS DIFFUSION PLANT |NOTIFICATION DATE: 10/25/2001| | RXTYPE: URANIUM ENRICHMENT FACILITY |NOTIFICATION TIME: 23:24[EDT]| | COMMENTS: 2 DEMOCRACY CENTER |EVENT DATE: 10/25/2001| | 6903 ROCKLEDGE DRIVE |EVENT TIME: 15:30[CDT]| | BETHESDA, MD 20817 (301)564-3200 |LAST UPDATE DATE: 10/25/2001| | CITY: PADUCAH REGION: 3 +-----------------------------+ | COUNTY: McCRACKEN STATE: KY |PERSON ORGANIZATION | |LICENSE#: GDP-1 AGREEMENT: Y |BRENT CLAYTON R3 | | DOCKET: 0707001 |E. WILLIAM BRACH NMSS | +------------------------------------------------+CHARLES MILLER IRO | | NRC NOTIFIED BY: T. E. WHITE | | | HQ OPS OFFICER: JOHN MacKINNON | | +------------------------------------------------+ | |EMERGENCY CLASS: NON EMERGENCY | | |10 CFR SECTION: | | |NBNL RESPONSE-BULLETIN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ EVENT TEXT +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | NRC BULLETIN 91-01 24 HOUR NOTIFICATION | | | | At 1530, on 10/25/01, the Plant Shift Superintendent (PSS) was notified that | | the 70-foot stack in the C-310 building was discovered to contain a deposit | | of fissile material. There is no NCSE/A which covers operation, | | maintenance, storage, etc. of this equipment. | | | | The presence of a deposit in the stack was not expected. A single NDA has | | been performed and indicates a deposit of less than 61 lbs.(U). Assay | | smears taken on the stack previously indicated an assay of approximately | | 1.6%. | | | | SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE OF THE EVENTS: | | | | For the assay of the deposit, the piping geometry and deposit mass are not | | sufficient to support a criticality. However, no NCSA controls have been | | established to address this fissile material operation. | | | | POTENTIAL CRITICALITY PATHWAYS INVOLVED (BRIEF SCENARIO(S) OF HOW | | CRITICALITY COULD OCCUR: | | | | Based on the assay and geometry of the piping it is not feasible for a | | criticality to occur in the pipe. Additionally, the pipe located | | approximately 8 feet above the floor and is therefore not feasible to have | | spacing violations. | | | | CONTROLLED PARAMETERS (MASS, MODERATION, GEOMETRY, CONCENTRATION, ETC.): | | | | Since this equipment does not have an NCSA for it, there is no controlled | | parameter. | | | | | | ESTIMATED AMOUNT, ENRICHMENT, FORM OF LICENSED MATERIAL (INCLUDE PROCESS | | LIMIT AND % WORST CASE CRITICAL MASS): | | | | 61 lbs. U with an enrichment of 1.6% U-235. | | | | NUCLEAR CRITICALITY SAFETY CONTROL(S) OR CONTROL SYSTEM(S) AND DESCRIPTIONS | | OF THE FAILURES OR DEFICIENCIES: | | | | The 70-foot discharge stack has been abandoned in place since the 200-foot | | stack was placed into service in the early 1980s. The 70-foot stack was | | last used briefly in the 1996 timeframe. The 70-foot stack has not been | | previously identified as a fissile material operation. This operation has | | not been evaluated for nuclear criticality safety. Therefore, double | | contingency was not maintained. | | | | CORRECTIVE ACTIONS TO RESTORE SAFETY SYSTEMS AND WHEN EACH WAS IMPLEMENTED: | | | | Characterize the remaining sections of the 70-foot stack system. Control | | the are around the stack and post as required by CP2-EG-NS1031. | | | | | | The NRC Resident Inspector was notified of this event by the certificate | | holder. | +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ .
Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021