The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission is in the process of rescinding or revising guidance and policies posted on this webpage in accordance with Executive Order 14151 Ending Radical and Wasteful Government DEI Programs and Preferencing, and Executive Order 14168 Defending Women From Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government. In the interim, any previously issued diversity, equity, inclusion, or gender-related guidance on this webpage should be considered rescinded that is inconsistent with these Executive Orders.

Event Notification Report for October 10, 2001

                    U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
                              Operations Center

                              Event Reports For
                           10/09/2001 - 10/10/2001

                              ** EVENT NUMBERS **

38362  38366  38367  38368  38369  

+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|Power Reactor                                    |Event Number:   38362       |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| FACILITY: COOK                     REGION:  3  |NOTIFICATION DATE: 10/07/2001|
|    UNIT:  [] [2] []                 STATE:  MI |NOTIFICATION TIME: 13:02[EDT]|
|   RXTYPE: [1] W-4-LP,[2] W-4-LP                |EVENT DATE:        10/07/2001|
+------------------------------------------------+EVENT TIME:        09:50[EDT]|
| NRC NOTIFIED BY:  STEVE CHERBA                 |LAST UPDATE DATE:  10/10/2001|
|  HQ OPS OFFICER:  FANGIE JONES                 +-----------------------------+
+------------------------------------------------+PERSON          ORGANIZATION |
|EMERGENCY CLASS:          NON EMERGENCY         |DAVID HILLS          R3      |
|10 CFR SECTION:                                 |                             |
|ARPS 50.72(b)(2)(iv)(B)  RPS ACTUATION - CRITICA|                             |
|                                                |                             |
|                                                |                             |
|                                                |                             |
+-----+----------+-------+--------+-----------------+--------+-----------------+
|UNIT |SCRAM CODE|RX CRIT|INIT PWR|   INIT RX MODE  |CURR PWR|  CURR RX MODE   |
+-----+----------+-------+--------+-----------------+--------+-----------------+
|                                                   |                          |
|2     A/R        Y       8        Power Operation  |0        Hot Standby      |
|                                                   |                          |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
                                   EVENT TEXT                                   
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| UNEXPECTED REACTOR TRIP DURING PLANT STARTUP OPERATIONS                      |
|                                                                              |
| ". . . . This event occurred at 0950 hours this morning (10-7-01). Currently |
| the Unit is in Mode 3 with all systems normal. At the time of the trip the   |
| unit was at approximately 8 % power (by RCS AT indication, about 6 to 7 % on |
| Power Range Nuclear Instrumentation) in power ascension and was just         |
| preparing to roll the main turbine.                                          |
|                                                                              |
| "RCS Tavg was noted to decrease below the normal 547 �F no-load post-trip    |
| value to about 535 �F by the Reactor Operator monitoring the temperature. At |
| the time of the trip one main feedwater pump was supplying the Steam         |
| Generators (SG), with low-flow feedwater pre-heating in service. Main        |
| feedwater isolated on the trip with the SGs being supplied post trip by the  |
| motor driven Auxiliary Feedwater (AFW) Pumps. The RCS cooldown was           |
| attributed to the #4 SG AFW flow control valve not closing as expected on    |
| high flow thus allowing too much flow to #4 SG, as well as steam that was    |
| still being supplied to low flow feedwater preheating. Operator actions      |
| taken in response to the cooldown were to close the main steam stop valves,  |
| and review AFW valve positions so as to limit steam flow from, and feed flow |
| to, the SGs. These actions were completed by 0959 hours, and were sufficient |
| to maintain temperature control. RCS temperature shortly recovered to 547 �F |
| at about 1032 hours, 10-7-01. No other significant abnormalities were noted, |
| pressurizer pressure decreased in response to the temperature transient, and |
| the subsequent RCS shrink caused RCS letdown to isolate on low pressurizer   |
| level. The plant is presently stable in Mode 3. No other RPS or SI setpoints |
| were exceeded due to the trip and subsequent temperature transient. All      |
| other systems and equipment functioned normally.                             |
|                                                                              |
| "The initiating RPS signal was a high Power Range Nuclear Instrument Rate    |
| Trip on 2 out of 4 channels. Cause of this rate trip is not definitively     |
| known at this time, rapid event teams to investigate and evaluate the trip   |
| have been initiated. Suspected cause is a Rod Control System problem."       |
|                                                                              |
| The licensee notified the NRC Resident Inspector.                            |
|                                                                              |
| * * * UPDATE 0353EDT ON 10/10/01 FROM DALE TURINETTI TO S. SANDIN * * *      |
|                                                                              |
| The following information was received as an update to this report:          |
|                                                                              |
| "The cause of the Unit 2 reactor trip was a negative rate trip as a result   |
| of a loss of Rod Control Motor Generator set voltage. The loss of voltage    |
| was attributed to a failed open resistor on the North motor generator set    |
| which caused a loss of voltage regulation. It is believed this loss of       |
| voltage caused the north motor generator set to act as a load; and the south |
| motor generator set could not maintain the output voltage. The reduction in  |
| voltage caused a collapse of field and the subsequent release of control     |
| rods and resultant negative rate trip.                                       |
|                                                                              |
| "The motor generator set resistors have been replaced and associated relays  |
| have been tested to ensure proper operation of the motor generator sets.     |
| Plant power ascension is in progress with the unit in mode 1 and at 25%."    |
|                                                                              |
| The licensee informed the NRC resident inspector.  Notified R3DO(Parker).    |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+

+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|Power Reactor                                    |Event Number:   38366       |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| FACILITY: THREE MILE ISLAND        REGION:  1  |NOTIFICATION DATE: 10/09/2001|
|    UNIT:  [1] [] []                 STATE:  PA |NOTIFICATION TIME: 12:22[EDT]|
|   RXTYPE: [1] B&W-L-LP,[2] B&W-L-LP            |EVENT DATE:        10/09/2001|
+------------------------------------------------+EVENT TIME:        11:30[EDT]|
| NRC NOTIFIED BY:  JOHN SCHORK                  |LAST UPDATE DATE:  10/09/2001|
|  HQ OPS OFFICER:  FANGIE JONES                 +-----------------------------+
+------------------------------------------------+PERSON          ORGANIZATION |
|EMERGENCY CLASS:          NON EMERGENCY         |CLIFF ANDERSON       R1      |
|10 CFR SECTION:                                 |                             |
|ACOM 50.72(b)(3)(xiii)   LOSS COMM/ASMT/RESPONSE|                             |
|                                                |                             |
|                                                |                             |
|                                                |                             |
+-----+----------+-------+--------+-----------------+--------+-----------------+
|UNIT |SCRAM CODE|RX CRIT|INIT PWR|   INIT RX MODE  |CURR PWR|  CURR RX MODE   |
+-----+----------+-------+--------+-----------------+--------+-----------------+
|1     N          N       0        Intermediate Shut|0        Intermediate Shut|
|                                                   |                          |
|                                                   |                          |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
                                   EVENT TEXT                                   
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| LANCASTER COUNTY EMERGENCY SIRENS WERE FOUND INOPERABLE                      |
|                                                                              |
| "At 11:30 AM on 10/9/01, TMI determined that the apparent inoperability of   |
| emergency sirens in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania for approximately 3 days  |
| met the criteria set forth in NUREG 1022, Rev. 2 for a major loss of         |
| emergency offsite communications capability and that an immediate 8 hour     |
| notification in accordance with 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(xiii) was required.       |
|                                                                              |
| "At approximately 8:55 am on Tuesday, October 9, 2001 the emergency sirens   |
| in Lancaster County were inadvertently activated during routine maintenance  |
| by Capitol Area Communications, the siren vendor. During the weekly          |
| evaluation of system electronics on Tuesday, October 9, 2001, Capitol Area   |
| Communications had discovered an anomaly with the system communications with |
| Lancaster County. Capitol Area Communications called Lancaster County and it |
| was found that apparently the transmitter for Lancaster County had been      |
| incorrectly left turned off following recent maintenance performed on        |
| Saturday, October 6, 2001 that occurred in the vicinity of the transmitter.  |
|                                                                              |
| "The transmitter was turned back on at approximately 8:55 am on Tuesday,     |
| October 9, 2001. When the transmitter was turned on, a signal that had been  |
| sent on Saturday, October 6, 2001 for the monthly Saturday test of the       |
| sirens that had been received but not acted upon, was acted upon by the      |
| transmitter which then activated the sirens. The sirens were silenced upon   |
| recognition of the inadvertent actuation. Lancaster County is notifying      |
| local media of the cause of the inadvertent siren actuation.                 |
|                                                                              |
| "Subsequent discussions between Exelon Emergency Management personnel and    |
| the siren vendor determined that the sirens for Lancaster County had         |
| apparently been inoperable from sometime on Saturday, October 6 until today, |
| Tuesday, October 9.                                                          |
|                                                                              |
| "The sirens in Lancaster County were reactivated when the transmitter [was   |
| turned] back on.                                                             |
|                                                                              |
| "The Lancaster County 911 dispatcher number 41 called the TMI Control Room   |
| at approximately 9:00 AM. The Control notified a duty public information     |
| representative of the siren malfunction. The duty Public Information         |
| Representative spoke with Lancaster County Emergency Management at 9:13 am   |
| who confirmed the information received from the 911 dispatcher.              |
| Subsequently, at 9:15 am Exelon emergency management reconfirmed the         |
| information received.                                                        |
|                                                                              |
| "The site Sr. Resident Inspector has been informed of the event and the 8    |
| hour report. TMI Communications contacted the Lancaster County Commissioners |
| and PEMA to inform them of the event."                                       |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+

+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|Power Reactor                                    |Event Number:   38367       |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| FACILITY: KEWAUNEE                 REGION:  3  |NOTIFICATION DATE: 10/09/2001|
|    UNIT:  [1] [] []                 STATE:  WI |NOTIFICATION TIME: 14:42[EDT]|
|   RXTYPE: [1] W-2-LP                           |EVENT DATE:        10/09/2001|
+------------------------------------------------+EVENT TIME:        09:00[CDT]|
| NRC NOTIFIED BY:  GARY HARRINGTON              |LAST UPDATE DATE:  10/09/2001|
|  HQ OPS OFFICER:  LEIGH TROCINE                +-----------------------------+
+------------------------------------------------+PERSON          ORGANIZATION |
|EMERGENCY CLASS:          NON EMERGENCY         |MICHAEL PARKER       R3      |
|10 CFR SECTION:                                 |                             |
|ADEG 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(A)  DEGRADED CONDITION     |                             |
|                                                |                             |
|                                                |                             |
|                                                |                             |
+-----+----------+-------+--------+-----------------+--------+-----------------+
|UNIT |SCRAM CODE|RX CRIT|INIT PWR|   INIT RX MODE  |CURR PWR|  CURR RX MODE   |
+-----+----------+-------+--------+-----------------+--------+-----------------+
|1     N          N       0        Refueling        |0        Refueling        |
|                                                   |                          |
|                                                   |                          |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
                                   EVENT TEXT                                   
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| DISCOVERY THAT ANTICIPATED FLOW MAY RESULT IN ENGINEERED SAFETY FEATURE      |
| EQUIPMENT BEING INCAPABLE OF PERFORMING DESIGN FUNCTIONS                     |
|                                                                              |
| The following text is a portion of a facsimile received from the licensee:   |
|                                                                              |
| "Prior to entering the scheduled refueling outage and while the plant was    |
| removed from service on 09/23/01, operating flow and temperature data for    |
| the Turbine Building Service Water (SW) system header was obtained.  The     |
| Turbine Building SW header is a branch connection off the Engineered         |
| Safeguards (ESF) SW header, which is manually selected to either 'A' or 'B'  |
| train ESF SW header.  Preliminary reviews of the data indicate that          |
| anticipated flows under accident conditions, using existing analysis limits, |
| result in ESF equipment being incapable of performing design functions.  The |
| current accident analyses for the SW ESF equipment only assumes a Turbine    |
| Building demand on the selected ESF header of 2000 gallons per minute (gpm). |
| The gathered data, when projected to accident temperature limits for design  |
| basis cooling requirements, shows the Turbine Building header flow to be     |
| significantly greater than 2000 gpm.  The data indicates that a lake water   |
| temperature of 55 degrees F would be the maximum that would support the      |
| previously assumed ESF operation Turbine Building header flow at 2000 gpm.   |
| Current accident analysis assumes that ESF equipment will remain operable up |
| to 80 degrees F lake water while supplying the Turbine Building header."     |
|                                                                              |
| "Kewaunee will continue to review available and previously assumed           |
| analytical data to determine what plant operational limitations may apply    |
| and or what changes may be necessary to support a return to power operation. |
| The current schedule for the refueling outage includes a return to power     |
| operation on December 5, 2001."                                              |
|                                                                              |
| The licensee stated that the unit is currently defueled as part of the       |
| ongoing refueling outage.                                                    |
|                                                                              |
| The licensee notified the NRC resident inspector.                            |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+

+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|Power Reactor                                    |Event Number:   38368       |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| FACILITY: MONTICELLO               REGION:  3  |NOTIFICATION DATE: 10/09/2001|
|    UNIT:  [1] [] []                 STATE:  MN |NOTIFICATION TIME: 15:25[EDT]|
|   RXTYPE: [1] GE-3                             |EVENT DATE:        10/09/2001|
+------------------------------------------------+EVENT TIME:        13:15[CDT]|
| NRC NOTIFIED BY:  JAMES McKAY                  |LAST UPDATE DATE:  10/09/2001|
|  HQ OPS OFFICER:  FANGIE JONES                 +-----------------------------+
+------------------------------------------------+PERSON          ORGANIZATION |
|EMERGENCY CLASS:          NON EMERGENCY         |MICHAEL PARKER       R3      |
|10 CFR SECTION:                                 |                             |
|APRE 50.72(b)(2)(xi)     OFFSITE NOTIFICATION   |                             |
|                                                |                             |
|                                                |                             |
|                                                |                             |
+-----+----------+-------+--------+-----------------+--------+-----------------+
|UNIT |SCRAM CODE|RX CRIT|INIT PWR|   INIT RX MODE  |CURR PWR|  CURR RX MODE   |
+-----+----------+-------+--------+-----------------+--------+-----------------+
|1     N          Y       100      Power Operation  |100      Power Operation  |
|                                                   |                          |
|                                                   |                          |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
                                   EVENT TEXT                                   
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| OFFSITE NOTIFICATION DUE TO GASOLINE SPILL OUTSIDE THE PROTECTED AREA        |
|                                                                              |
| The licensee was filling a company minivan with gasoline when the automatic  |
| shut-off valve stuck and an uncontained spill occurred of greater than 5     |
| gallons and less than 50 gallons.  This occurred outside of the protected    |
| area.  The licensee is conducting cleaning efforts in accordance with proper |
| procedures.                                                                  |
|                                                                              |
| The licensee notified the state and local authorities concerning the spill,  |
| making this notification necessary.  The licensee notified the NRC Resident  |
| Inspector.                                                                   |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+

+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|Power Reactor                                    |Event Number:   38369       |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| FACILITY: CRYSTAL RIVER            REGION:  2  |NOTIFICATION DATE: 10/09/2001|
|    UNIT:  [3] [] []                 STATE:  FL |NOTIFICATION TIME: 21:27[EDT]|
|   RXTYPE: [3] B&W-L-LP                         |EVENT DATE:        10/09/2001|
+------------------------------------------------+EVENT TIME:        18:20[EDT]|
| NRC NOTIFIED BY:  BRYAN FERGUSON               |LAST UPDATE DATE:  10/09/2001|
|  HQ OPS OFFICER:  LEIGH TROCINE                +-----------------------------+
+------------------------------------------------+PERSON          ORGANIZATION |
|EMERGENCY CLASS:          NON EMERGENCY         |BRIAN BONSER, REG 2  IRC     |
|10 CFR SECTION:                                 |                             |
|AMED 50.72(b)(3)(xii)    OFFSITE MEDICAL        |                             |
|                                                |                             |
|                                                |                             |
|                                                |                             |
+-----+----------+-------+--------+-----------------+--------+-----------------+
|UNIT |SCRAM CODE|RX CRIT|INIT PWR|   INIT RX MODE  |CURR PWR|  CURR RX MODE   |
+-----+----------+-------+--------+-----------------+--------+-----------------+
|3     N          N       0        Refueling        |0        Refueling        |
|                                                   |                          |
|                                                   |                          |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
                                   EVENT TEXT                                   
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| TRANSPORT OF A RADIOACTIVELY CONTAMINATED PERSON TO AN OFFSITE MEDICAL       |
| FACILITY FOR TREATMENT                                                       |
|                                                                              |
| The following text is a portion of a facsimile received from the licensee:   |
|                                                                              |
| "On October 09, 2001, a contract worker injured his leg while working in the |
| Reactor Building at Crystal River Unit 3.  The injury required the worker to |
| be transported offsite to a local medical facility.  A Health Physics        |
| technician accompanied the individual to the medical facility since he was   |
| potentially contaminated.  The subsequent survey found radioactive           |
| contamination on the individual's clothing and on the backboard used for     |
| transport.  The Health Physics technician took custody of the contaminated   |
| material and returned it to Crystal River Unit 3."                           |
|                                                                              |
| "This is reportable as an 8-hour report under 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(xii), 'any  |
| event requiring the transport of a radioactively contaminated person to an   |
| offsite medical facility for treatment.' "                                   |
|                                                                              |
| The licensee notified the NRC resident inspector.                            |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+


Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021