The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission is in the process of rescinding or revising guidance and policies posted on this webpage in accordance with Executive Order 14151 Ending Radical and Wasteful Government DEI Programs and Preferencing, and Executive Order 14168 Defending Women From Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government. In the interim, any previously issued diversity, equity, inclusion, or gender-related guidance on this webpage should be considered rescinded that is inconsistent with these Executive Orders.

Health Physics Questions and Answers - Question 214

Question 214:

(a) If the individual had not been monitored at his previous employer while receiving an occupational dose (i.e., the dose there had been determined not likely to exceed 10% of the limits), and the current employer, Licensee Z, determines in advance that the worker's annual dose for both licensees will exceed 10% (although the dose at Licensee Z will not exceed 10%), must Licensee Z monitor for external dose?

(b) If the individual worked for several previous employers during the year, some who badged and some who did not, and Licensee Z makes a prospective determination that its own activities will result in a dose less than 10%, must Licensee Z monitor for external dose?

Answer:

(a) No. The criteria to determine whether monitoring is required is independent of exposures received at any other place of employment prior to or subsequent to employment with Licensee Z.

(b) No.

(Reference: 10 CFR 20.1502, 10 CFR 20.2104, Regulatory Guide 8.34)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, November 24, 2017