Advanced Reactors Sub-Arena
Advanced reactors comprise one of four sub-arenas that the staff of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) identified in considering which areas of the reactor safety arena to target for greater use of risk information. This page summarizes the following aspects of this sub-arena:
Develop a coherent risk-informed and performance-based regulatory structure for design certification, licensing, and oversight of advanced reactors.
A coherent risk-informed and performance-based regulatory structure would offer significant improvements in effectiveness and efficiency (compared to the structure that has evolved for current-generation LWRs). For example, such coherence would ensure that the safety reviews conducted by the NRC consider design and operational aspects in an integrated manner. The bases for developing such a regulatory structure for licensing and oversight of advanced reactors are articulated in numerous Commission documents and policy statements. However, this guidance occurs largely in the context of existing and new LWRs and, consequently, needs to be adapted for advanced reactors.
The bases for a coherent risk-informed and performance-based regulatory structure arise from the potential to realize benefits that are captured in the screening criteria that the NRC staff considers in undertaking regulatory improvement initiatives:
- Effectiveness: One hallmark of effectiveness is the ability to model the tradeoffs that are involved in a complex safety review. Sometimes, such tradeoffs are represented as the ability to achieve desired outcomes in the licensing process. A risk-informed and performance-based regulatory structure is inherently better able to do this, especially if it is applied in the early phases of developing a new regulatory structure for advanced reactors.
- Effective Communication: The explicit modeling of decision-making promotes transparency. Sometimes, the traditional prescriptive regulatory structure lacks transparency because it tends to emphasize compliance with a prescribed quantity, rather than focusing on the safety function.
- Research: The NRC staff has conducted significant research into the models and methodologies for the risk-informed and performance-based regulatory structure and the products and expertise from this work are available for implementation. Particularly notable examples include NUREG-1860, NUREG/BR-0303, and SECY-05-0138. Specific details will need to be determined and guidance developed based on the particular technology and design aspects of the application.
- Costs: The implementation of a coherent risk-informed and performance-based regulatory structure for advanced reactors will entail a combination of short- and long-term costs. The new regulatory approaches are likely to result in short-term costs. However, when considered in the context of implementing the Commission’s strategic objectives, there are sound reasons to expect a significant reduction in the total cost to society.
- Obstacles: There are no apparent factors (e.g., state-of-the-art, adverse stakeholder perception) that would preclude implementing a risk-informed and performance-based approach to the design certification, licensing, and oversight of advanced reactors once sufficient operating experience is available to provide input to the activities.
The NRC developed its strategic planning process as a result of considerable effort (beginning in the late-1990s) to improve the agency’s regulatory structure in a forward-looking way, while preserving the gains that the agency had achieved in operating reactor safety. Using the most recent version of the Strategic Plan, development of a coherent risk-informed and performance-based regulatory structure for advanced reactors will involve implementing the strategies that the Commission articulated in the goal of “Safety”. Under “Safety” strategies, the Commission directed the staff to “Use sound science and state-of-the-art methods to establish, where appropriate, risk-informed and performance-based regulations.” This element continues to be part of the Strategic Plan for the Fiscal Year (FY) 2008–2013.
The basic infrastructure for the implementation of a risk-informed and performance-based approach exists at a high-level in Commission documents, such as the “White Paper on Risk-Informed and Performance-Based Regulation.” The staff has also developed some specific guidance, including the risk-informed process for implementing the single-failure criterion (SECY-05-0138), but more may need to be developed. In many instances, the high-level documents superficially apply only to existing LWRs; however, more thorough study reveals considerable applicability to all reactor technologies. For example, the Reactor Oversight Process (SECY-99-007 and SECY-99-007A, as well as related staff requirements memorandum) provides a risk-informed and performance-based structure, although it is overlaid on top of existing LWR requirements.
The staff’s risk-informed and performance-based goals for advanced reactors relate to the following activities:
- Ensure advanced reactor applicants use risk-informed safety insights to select among alternative features, operational strategies, and design options to reduce or eliminate the significant risk contributors of existing operating plants.
- Ensure that the risk associated with advanced reactor designs compare favorably with the Commission’s goals of less than 1E-04/year for core damage frequency and less than 1E-06/year for large release frequency
Risk-Informed and Performance-Based Activities
The following table specifies the ongoing rulemaking initiatives, projects, and activities that the staff of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has targeted for greater use of risk information in the Advanced Reactors Sub-Arena within the Reactor Safety Arena.
This page includes links to files in non-HTML format. See Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools for more information.
|Initiative, Program or Project||Project Description and Major Activities||Status
|Risk-informing SSCs for SMRs||
Provide the Commission with a paper that explores the feasibility (e.g., regulatory infrastructure changes, resource requirements, and timing for implementation) of including risk information in categorizing structures, systems and components (SSCs) as safety-related and non safety-related for the design-specific small modular reactor (SMR) review plans in both the short and long term.
|Pre-application review for NGNP: As part of the implementation of the NGNP licensing strategy, review white papers submitted by the NGNP project related to various licensing issues, including the use of risk-informed approaches.||
The NRC staff is reviewing NGNP-related white papers from a risk-informed and performance-based perspective. These papers address the approach on such topics as probabilistic risk assessment (PRA); selection of licensing-basis events (LBE); classification of structures, systems, and components (SSCs); and defense-in-depth.
|Pre-application review for SMR designs: Develop a framework, implementation strategy, and plans and schedules to more fully integrate the use of risk insights into pre-application activities and the review of small modular reactor (SMR) applications.||
Pre-application activities consistent with the Commission's Advanced Reactor Policy Statement to prepare for receiving an SMR-related application currently not expected to occur before 2013.
The NRC staff is developing risk-informed, performance-based approaches to better align review resources, consistent with regulatory requirements, to risk-significant SSCs to enhance the efficiency of the review process. The staff will use risk insights in determining which portions of existing review guidance (e.g., standard review plans) should be applied to SMRs. This effort will, in turn, support the development of risk-informed licensing review plans for each of the SMR reviews including the associated pre-application activities. In the longer term, the staff will use this experience to develop a new risk-informed regulatory framework for the NGNP or other advanced reactor project.
|Use of risk insights to enhance safety focus of small modular reactor (SMR) reviews||
Use risk insights to enhance the efficiency of the review process for SMR applications and develop a new risk-informed regulatory framework.
Use risk insights to identify risk-significant systems, structures, and components and other aspects of the designs that contribute most to safety. As a long-term objective, develop a new risk-informed regulatory framework.
To request additional information, Contact Us About Risk-Informed, Performance-Based Regulation.