Home > NRC Library > Document Collections > Generic Communications > Information Notices > 1993 > IN 93-101
Information Notice No. 93-101: Jet Pump Hold-Down Beam Failure
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555 December 17, 1993 NRC INFORMATION NOTICE 93-101: JET PUMP HOLD-DOWN BEAM FAILURE Addressees All holders of operating licenses or construction permits for boiling-water reactors (BWRs). Purpose The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing this information notice to alert addressees to a recent jet pump hold-down beam failure of a type not previously described by vendor guidance or by generic communications. It is expected that recipients will review the information for applicability to their facilities and consider actions, as appropriate, to avoid similar problems. However, suggestions contained in this information notice are not NRC requirements; therefore, no specific action or written response is required. Background On April 4, 1980, the NRC issued a bulletin, IEB 80-07, "BWR Jet Pump Assembly Failure," requesting that the owners of BWR-3 and BWR-4 plants perform visual and ultrasonic examinations of jet pump hold-down beams at the mid-length ligament sections bounding the beam bolt. This action resulted from a jet pump hold-down beam failure at Dresden Unit 3 and crack indications identified at other BWR-3 plants in early 1980. Observed cracks began at the bolt hole in the center of the jet pump hold-down beam. The bulletin also requested that licensees conduct jet pump operability surveillance on a daily basis and following unexpected changes in core flow indications, recirculation system flow indications, or an established power-core flow relationship. The nuclear steam supply system vendor, General Electric (GE), issued service information letters to owners of BWR plants on June 9, 1980, and in February 1981 providing guidance for recognizing jet pump problems using data gathered during plant operations. During implementation of the inspections prescribed in IEB 80-07, several other BWR-3 and BWR-4 plants reported discovery of beam cracking. Description of Circumstances On September 13, 1993, Grand Gulf power station (a BWR-6 plant) experienced an unplanned high-pressure core spray system initiation, due to a reactor low- water-level signal, that resulted in a reactor scram. Initially, the reasons for the water level anomalies detected in the "C" and "G" channels of the reactor water level instrumentation could not be determined. During restart from the reactor scram, the plant operations personnel discovered jet pump 9312160095. IN 93-101 December 17, 1993 Page 2 of 3 flow differential pressure anomalies. During the investigation of the problem, the plant experienced oscillating water level indications and jet pump flow readings characteristic of a displaced jet pump mixer section. These indications occurred at high recirculation flows in the reactor core (77 percent core flow). Following reactor shutdown and disassembly, the licensee found the mixer assembly for jet pump 10 had separated from the diffuser and relocated between jet pump 8 and jet pump 9. The hold-down beam for jet pump 10 had cracked and failed. Discussion The jet pump hold-down beam failure at the Grand Gulf power station in September 1993 is unlike previous failures in that the hold-down beam for jet pump 10 failed in the transition area between the main body of the beam and the beam end as shown in Attachment 1. There have not been any previous reports of failures in this location. One beam end failed completely, causing the beam to come out of the transition piece, removing the restraint on the jet pump elbow and leading to the disassembly of jet pump 10. There is one hold-down beam for each jet pump assembly. Visual examination of the failed beam showed a crack face covering more than 270� of the cross-section of the intact beam end; the other beam end had cracked in the same location and was missing. The cracks began in an area where a radius machining cut had been made in the forging and led to failure in a location of the beam with a cross- section smaller than the areas that had been affected in previous cases. GE concluded that the probable cause of failure was an intergranular stress corrosion crack that propagated over 80 percent of the fracture surface. Fatigue striations covered the remaining 20 percent of the surface. GE stated that the loss of preload as a result of the intergranular stress corrosion may have induced the fatigue failure. The licensee conducted ultrasonic examinations on the other inservice jet pump beams and found indications on jet pump 8 and jet pump 21 at the bolt hole area in the center of the hold-down beams. This cracking was consistent with that described in bulletin IEB 80-07. The licensee replaced all the jet pump beams with spare beams available on site. In October 1993, ultrasonic test inspection of the hold-down beams at the Clinton power plant (a BWR-6 plant) revealed that one of the beams had crack indications around the center of the bolt hole region and the beam was replaced. On November 22, 1993, Pennsylvania Power and Light Company notified the NRC that it would be replacing all of the jet pump beams at Susquehanna Unit 1 before restarting from their refueling outage. This action was being taken as a precautionary measure given the new failure mode identified at the Grand Gulf station. GE has made a recommendation to licensees that they replace their jet pump hold-down beams as soon as practical if (1) they have beams of the same design as Grand Gulf and (2) the beams will have an accumulated service of more than eight years at the next refueling outage. The water level anomalies that occurred at Grand Gulf on September 13 and September 28, 1993 were apparently caused by the turbulent flow conditions in the vicinity of jet pump 10. The potential for level anomalies was not discussed in bulletin IEB 80-07.. IN 93-101 December 17, 1993 Page 3 of 3 The disassembly of a jet pump could result in an increased flow area through the jet pump and a lower core flooding elevation. This could adversely affect the water level in the core during the reflood phase of a LOCA as well as the assumed blowdown flow during a LOCA. Although events to date have not resulted in damage which affected the operability of safety-related systems or equipment, a loose jet pump assembly could potentially cause such damage. The NRC staff will continue to evaluate information concerning the beam end failure mechanism as it becomes available and will follow the progress of any new inspection techniques and corrective actions that may be developed. The NRC staff expects to meet with the BWR Owners Group and GE to discuss their action plans as a part of the ongoing safety evaluation to determine the need for further regulatory action. Areas of discussion will include evaluations of damage potential due to a displaced jet pump, effects of a failed jet pump on plant ATWS response, and the potential for LOCA loads to induce hold-down beam failures. This information notice requires no specific action or written response. If you have any questions about the information in this notice, please contact the technical contacts listed below or the appropriate Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) Project Manager. /s/'d by BKGrimes Brian K. Grimes, Director Division of Operating Reactor Support Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Technical contacts: Rudolph H. Bernhard, RII James A. Davis, NRR (601) 437-4620 (301) 504-2713 Jonathan Witter, NRR (301) 504-2978 Attachments: 1. Figure - Jet Pump Beam Failure Location 2. List of Recently Issued NRC Information Notices .
Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, November 12, 2013