Part 21 Report - 1997-272

ACCESSION #: 9704090034 GENERAL ATOMICS April 4, 1997 696-2707 VIA OVERNIGHT EXPRESS SERVICE U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 Subject: Written Notification of 10 CFR 21 Reportable Item Dear Sir or Madam: This letter is provided in compliance with the requirements of 10 CFR 21.21 (d)(3)(ii) for providing written notification within 30 days following receipt of information by the director or responsible corporate officer on the identification of a defect. Initial notification was made by facsimile to the NRC Operations Center on March 27, 1997. The information following is in accordance with the reporting requirements of 10CFR21.21 (a)(4): i) Name of person informing the Commission in writing: Dr. Keith E. Asmussen, Director Licensing, Safety and Nuclear Compliance General Atomics 3550 General Atomics Court San Diego, CA 92121 Name of person who provided initial notification by facsimile: Mr. John E. Jones Sr. Vice President, Administration General Atomics 3550 General Atomics Court San Diego, CA 92121 ii) Description of the defect: In the process of performing software verification and validation (V&V) of the RM-23A Control and Display Module (part number 03575300-001), Sorrento Electronics, Inc. (SE) has determined that the Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Manual for the RM-23A may not adequately define the requirements for performing periodic surveillance of certain safety related applications. iii) Identification of the firm: Sorrento Electronics, Inc. An Affiliate of General Atomics iv) The nature of the defect: A series of diagnostics tests are used to identify hardware failures which may not be detected during normal operation. These diagnostics tests are described in the O&M Manual and include: 3550 GENERAL ATOMICS COURT, SAN DIEGO, CA 92121-1194 PO BOX 85608, SAN DIEGO, CA 92186-9784 (619) 455-3000 A. Lamp and LED test B. Keyboard input test C. Clock interrupt test D. Digital inputs test E. Digital outputs test F. Analog outputs test The O&M Manual does not adequately emphasize the need to consider performing these tests as part of normal maintenance to declare operability in safety related applications. V) The date on which the information was obtained: Potential defect was first discovered on January 30, 1997 Director or responsible person informed of defect on March 26, 1997 vi) The number and location of the components: (See Attachment 1) vii) Corrective action: Sorrento Electronics made the individual purchasers aware of this possible problem and will revise the RM-23A Operation and Maintenance Manual E-115-1256 (Rev. 1) to clarify the periodic surveillance requirements for the RM-23A. viii) Advice to Purchasers: The functions tested by the above diagnostics tests should be evaluated for the affect on plant safety. Any function which affects plant safety should be periodically tested. Sorrento Electronics recommends that as a minimum, the clock interrupt test should be performed since the RM-23A will not schedule tasks without the interrupt being present. The interval between these tests should be determined by the Purchaser. If you have any questions concerning this report, please call Mr. Brian Laney at (619) 455-4369 or me at (619) 455-2823. Any technical questions should be addressed to Mr. Dirk Koopman at 619-457-8899. Yours Very Truly, Dr. Keith E. Asmussen, Director Licensing, Safety and Nuclear Compliance Attachment: As stated above cc: Regional Administrator, NRC Region IV Attachment 1 Locations of RM-23A's Number of RM-23A's Site Installed in Beaver Valley 16 Bruce A 10 Chinshan 1 and 2 6 Dresden 2 and 3 1 Hope Creek 18 Indian Point 3 16 Kori 1 and 2 6 Kuosheng 1 and 2 7 Millstone 2 1 Oconee 1, 2, and 3 6 Sequoyah 1 and 2 8 South Texas 1 and 2 34 Turkey Point 3 and 4 3 Zion 1 and 2 1 *** END OF DOCUMENT ***

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021