EA-97-244 - Westinghouse Electric Corporation
Westinghouse Electric Corporation
Commercial Nuclear Fuel Division
ATTN: Mr. J. A. Fici, Division General Manager
P.O. Box 355
Pittsburgh, PA 15230-6600
SUBJECT: NOTICE OF VIOLATION (NRC Special Inspection Report No. 70-1151/97-203)
Dear Mr. Fici:
This refers to the inspection conducted on May 5 - 7, 1997, at the Westinghouse Commercial Nuclear Fuel Division facility in Columbia, South Carolina. The inspection was conducted to review the circumstances that led to the reported event on April 15, 1997, involving two low-enriched fuel rods that could not be located. On May 27, 1997, the NRC conducted a re-exit briefing via telephone with members of your staff, and on June 25, 1997, issued the inspection report detailing our findings. A predecisional enforcement conference was held with you and members of your staff on July 9, 1997, to discuss the apparent violations, their root causes, and your corrective action.
Based on the information developed during the inspection, and the information that you provided during the conference, the NRC has determined that five violations of NRC requirements occurred. These violations are cited in the enclosed Notice of Violation (Notice) and the circumstances surrounding them are described in detail in the subject inspection report. Specifically, the violations involved Westinghouse's failure to: (1) implement proper notification procedures of the event to the NRC; (2) provide adequate training for certain employees that handled Special Nuclear Material (SNM); (3) provide adequate procedures for handling and testing of lead-filled rods; (4) comply with numerous Department of Transportation (DOT) requirements; and (5) adequately implement Westinghouse's Material Control and Accounting (MC&A) program.
The NRC is particularly concerned that your staff had prior opportunities to identify the unaccounted for fuel rods. Specifically, on October 16, 1996, the "7-day report" included the two fuel rods in question, but was not acted upon by the responsible Material Service Attendant (MSA). In addition, from October 16, 1996, to March 20, 1997, the MSA team manager neither required that the location of the fuel rods be determined, in accordance with the "7-day report" requirements, nor reported the status of the fuel rods to the safeguards coordinator, as required by your procedures.
The NRC recognizes that the actual or potential safety consequences were minimal in this case. However, the violations in the enclosed Notice are of significant regulatory concern because, collectively, they are indicative of inadequate management attention toward licensed activities. The lack of management oversight is evidenced by the fact that Westinghouse employees and management did not have a high level of sensitivity to item control and accounting. Given the loss of control of the two unirradiated fuel rods, the number of violations that are related to this single event, and the number of prior opportunities that could have identified the event progression sooner, the violations have been classified in the aggregate in accordance with the "General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions" (Enforcement Policy), NUREG-1600 as a Severity Level III problem.
In accordance with the Enforcement Policy, a base civil penalty in the amount of $12,500 is considered for a Severity Level III problem. Because your facility has not been the subject of escalated enforcement actions within the last 2 years, the NRC considered whether credit was warranted for Corrective Action in accordance with the civil penalty assessment process in Section VI.B.2 of the Enforcement Policy. In this case, the NRC has determined that credit is warranted for your prompt and comprehensive corrective action. Specifically, your corrective action that you discussed during the July 9, 1997 conference included: (1) stopping shipments of all replica fuel assemblies and non-product fuel rods; (2) holding a management meeting to emphasize the importance of item control and to ensure that all managers understood NRC requirements; (3) providing immediate training to personnel involved in the event; (4) establishing a new procedure for manufacture and movement of replica fuel rods; (5) developing a plan to provide an improved method to ensure a timely final accounting of all fuel rods when a region of fuel has been completed; and (6) instilling a high level of sensitivity to item control and accounting. Of particular note is the seriousness with which you viewed this event as demonstrated by your plans to shut down the facility, if the fuel rods had not been found by April 18, 1997.
Therefore, to encourage prompt and comprehensive correction of violations, and in recognition of the absence of previous escalated enforcement action, I have been authorized, after consultation with the Director, Office of Enforcement, not to propose a civil penalty in this case. However, significant violations in the future could result in a civil penalty. You should note that issuance of this Severity Level III violation constitutes escalated enforcement action that may subject you to increased inspection effort.
You are required to respond to this letter and should follow the instructions specified in the enclosed Notice when preparing your response. In addition, given that the violations occurred during a non-routine operation, the NRC is concerned that similar problems may occur in other non-routine activities. Therefore, as part of your response, please provide any corrective actions taken or planned to prevent recurrence of similar violations in other non-routine activities. The NRC will use your response, in part, to determine whether further enforcement action is necessary to ensure compliance with regulatory requirements.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter, its enclosure, and your response will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room.
Sincerely, Elizabeth Q. Ten Eyck, Director Division of Fuel Cycle Safety And Safeguards, NMSS
Docket No. 70-1151
License No. SNM-1107
Enclosure: Notice of Violation
Westinghouse Docket No. 70-1151 Commercial Nuclear Fuel Division License No. SNM-1107 Columbia, South Carolina EA 97-244
During an NRC inspection conducted on May 5 - 7, 1997, violations of NRC requirements were identified. In accordance with the "General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," NUREG-1600, the violations are listed below:
A. 10 CFR 74.11 requires, in part, that the licensee notify the NRC Operations Center within one hour of discovery of any loss or theft or other unlawful diversion of SNM [Special Nuclear Material] which the licensee is licensed to possess.
10 CFR 20.2201(a)(1)(ii) requires, in part, that the licensee provide a telephone report within 30 days after the occurrence of any lost, stolen, or missing licensed material becomes known to the licensee, all licensed material in a quantity greater than 10 times the quantity specified in Appendix C [0.01 µCi] to part 20 that is still missing at this time.
Licensee Condition SG-1.1 states, in part, that the licensee shall follow Chapters 1.0 through 9.0 of its "Fundamental Nuclear Material Control (FNMC) Plan."
Section 2.2.2 of the licensee's FNMC Plan requires, in part, that after resolving item and/or material control anomalies, Columbia Plant Manager, within 30 days or less, submit initial written report to the NRC.
Contrary to the above, the licensee failed to provide the required notifications in that:1. On October 16, 1996, the licensee had indications that two fuel rods were missing and on October 20, 1996, failed to notify the NRC Operations Center within 1 hour1;
2. On October 16, 1996, the licensee had indications that two fuel rods were missing and on November 19, 1996, failed to submit a telephone report to the NRC within 30 days. (01013)
B. License Condition Number (No.) S-1 of License No. SNM-1107 requires that licensed materials be used in accordance with statements, representations, and conditions in the license's License Application dated April 30, 1995, and supplements thereto.
Paragraph 2.1.2 of Chapter 2 of the License Application requires, in part, that, first level managers are also responsible for assuring that personnel under their jurisdiction receive adequate training.
Paragraph 3.4.2 of Chapter 3 of the License Application requires, in part, that "training will be provided for every individual in the Columbia Fuel Fabrication Facility (CFFF), commensurate with their duties. Formal training programs will be developed and implemented to enhance and augment procedure review and acknowledgment described in Paragraph 3.4.1(d) of this Chapter, and training responsibilities described in Chapter 2.0 of this License Application. Training records will be maintained in accordance with Section 3.8 of this Chapter."
Contrary to the above, as of October 10, 1996, the licensee failed to properly implement its training program with regard to handling SNM in that:1. The Material Service Attendant (MSA) First Level Manager did not assure that MSA personnel received proper training with regard to the use of Mechanical Operating Procedure (MOP) 759006, "ADU Fuel Rod Staging Area Instructions," and implementation of the 7-day report requirements;
2. The formal training program did not document the training received by an MSA in order for that individual to qualify for the position;
3. Training of the MSA First Level Manager was not effective in assuring that licensee personnel had an adequate understanding of the duties and responsibilities of the position, as evidenced by the failure to:(a) routinely review and assure proper disposition of items listed in the 7-day report from October 1996 through January 1997; and
(b) once notified of the listed item, to disposition it in a timely manner or promptly notify the Safeguards Coordinator. (01023)
C. License Condition Number (No.) S-1 of License No. SNM-1107 requires that licensed materials be used in accordance with statements, representations, and conditions in the license's License Application dated April 30, 1995, and supplements thereto.
Section 3.4.1 of Chapter 3 of the License Application requires that operations to assure safe, compliant activities involving nuclear material will be conducted in accordance with approved procedures. Section 3.4.1(a.3) requires that the salient utility of Category-3 Procedures will be to provide training and instructions, including health, safety, and safeguards, for the Operations, Maintenance, Inspection, and Analytical Services Functions.
Contrary to the above, on October 5, 1996, the licensee failed to provide adequate procedures for handling and testing lead-filled rods. Specifically, Special Routing 13382 was inadequate in that it lacked many of the instructions for the operation of the various equipment stations that were required by the routine Mechanical Operating Procedures for those stations; it referenced other Quality Control Instruction procedures that could not be followed for the planned operation; and the review and approval process failed to identify that the procedure could not be followed as written. (01033)
D. 10 CFR 71.5(a) requires that a licensee who transports licensed material outside of the site of usage, as specified in the NRC license, or where transport is on public highways, or who delivers licensed material to a carrier for transport, comply with the applicable requirements of the regulations appropriate to the mode of transport of the Department of Transportation (DOT) in 49 CFR Parts 171 through 189.
49 CFR 171.2(a) prohibits any person from offering hazardous material for transportation unless, among other requirements, the hazardous material is properly classified, described, packaged, marked, labeled, and in condition for shipment required or authorized under the Hazardous Material Regulations (49 CFR Parts 171-177).
10 CFR 110.5 prohibits the export of special nuclear material (SNM), including unirradiated fuel, unless authorized by a general or specific license issued under Part 110.
10 CFR 71.12(a) issues a general license to any licensee of the Commission to transport, or deliver to a carrier for transport, licensed material in a package for which a license, Certificate of Compliance (CoC), or other approval has been issued by the NRC. 10 CFR 71.12(c)(2) requires the licensee to comply to the terms and conditions of the NRC CoC and the applicable requirements of subparts A, G, and H of this part.
NRC CoC, No. 9239, Rev. 4, dated March 21, 1996, requires that the minimum transport index (TI) for a shipment of material in the licensee's shipping containers designated as MCC-3, MCC-4, or MCC-5, be shown on the shipping label for nuclear criticality safety as 0.4.
Contrary to the above, on October 10, 1996, the licensee inadvertently shipped two unirradiated fuel rods from their site in Columbia, South Carolina, to an overseas location, the Temelin Plant in the Czech Republic, and the licensee failed to comply with the transportation requirements for the shipment of licensed material specified in 10 CFR 71.5 and 49 CFR 170 through 189 in that:1. The shipment of transport container No. M508 was classified as non-hazardous; however, two unirradiated fuel rods which contained hazardous material were present, a violation of 49 CFR 171.2(a);
2. The shipment of transport container No. M508 failed to comply with several DOT hazard communication requirements, including those for shipping papers [49 CFR 172.200(a)] in that it failed to describe the hazardous material, marking [49 CFR 172.301(a)] in that it failed to mark the package with the proper shipping name and identification number, and labeling [49 CFR 172.403(a)] in that it failed to label the package in accordance with the requirements;
3. The shipment of transport container No. M508 resulted in the export of two unirradiated fuel rods, a quantity that requires an NRC specific license under 10 CFR 110.5 (the licensee used NRC License No. XCOM1082 rather than NRC License No. XSNM02785, which authorizes the export of a specified amount of SNM); and
4. The shipment of transport container (designated MCC-5) No. M508 did not comply with the terms and conditions of NRC CoC Number 9239, in that transport container No. M508 did not indicate a minimum transportation index of 0.4 on the label for criticality safety as required by the CoC. (01043)
E. Licensee Condition SG-1.1 states, in part, that the licensee shall follow Chapters 1.0 through 9.0 of its "Fundamental Nuclear Material Control (FNMC) Plan."
10 CFR 74.31(a)(1) requires the licensee's material control and accounting (MC&A) system to confirm the presence of special nuclear material (SNM).
10 CFR 74.31(c)(6) requires, in part, that the licensees maintain current knowledge of items when the sum of the time of existence of an item, the time to make a record of the item, and the time necessary to locate the item exceeds 14 days, and also store and handle, or subsequently measure, items in a manner so that unauthorized removals of items will be detected.
10 CFR 74.15(a) requires, in part, that each licensee who receives and ships SNM shall complete a Nuclear Material Transaction Report (DOE/NRC Form 741) in accordance with instructions in NUREG/BR-0006, "Instructions for Completing Nuclear Material Transaction Reports and Concise Note Forms." Critical MC&A Procedure NMM-CP-650, "Nuclear Material Shipments," requires that all SNM shipped from the Columbia plant shall be measured or received a measurement verification before departing the plant site, and DOE/NRC Form 741 with shipper's values must be completed by the assigned personnel within one day of the shipment.
Section 6.2 of the licensee's FNMC Plan requires that the licensee maintains control of items and verifies material shipment and removal from the item control program.
Contrary to the above, from October 5, 1996, through April 17, 1997, the licensee failed to adequately implement its MC&A program in that the first general performance objective of 10 CFR Part 74.31 was not met, and the item control program failed to confirm the presence of two fuel rods. In addition, the licensee failed to maintain a current knowledge of items or make appropriate records when the items could not be located within 14 days. As a result of the loss of item control, the required DOE/NRC Form 741s were not generated. (01053)
These violations represent a Severity Level III Problem (Supplement VI).
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Westinghouse Electric Corporation is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, D.C. 20555, with a copy to the Regional Administrator, Region II, and to the Director, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice of Violation (Notice). This reply should be clearly marked as a "Reply to a Notice of Violation" and should include for each violation: (1) the reason for the violation, or, if contested, the basis for disputing the violation, (2) the corrective steps that have been taken and the results achieved, (3) the corrective steps that will be taken to avoid further violations, and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved. Your response may reference or include previous docketed correspondence, if the correspondence adequately addresses the required response. If an adequate reply is not received within the time specified in this Notice, an order or a Demand for Information may be issued as to why the license should not be modified, suspended, or revoked, or why such other action as may be proper should not be taken. Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time.
Under the authority of Section 182 of the Act, 42 U.S.C. 2232, this response shall be submitted under oath or affirmation.
Because your response will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room (PDR), to the extent possible, it should not include any personal privacy, proprietary, or safeguards information so that it can be placed in the PDR without redaction. If personal privacy or proprietary information is necessary to provide an acceptable response, then please provide a bracketed copy of your response that identifies the information that should be protected and a redacted copy of your response that deletes such information. If you request withholding of such material, you must specifically identify the portions of your response that you seek to have withheld and provide in detail the bases for your claim of withholding (e.g., explain why the disclosure of information will create an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy or provide the information required by 10 CFR 2.790(b) to support a request for withholding confidential commercial or financial information). If safeguards information is necessary to provide an acceptable response, please provide the level of protection described in 10 CFR 73.21.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland
this 28th day of July 1997
1. NUREG-1065, "Acceptable Standard Format and Content for the Fundamental Nuclear Material Control Plan (FNMCP) Required for Low-Enriched Uranium Facilities," grants licensees 72 hours to determine whether special nuclear material is missing.