FMRI, Inc. (Fansteel)
1.0 Site Identification
|Type of Site:||Complex Decommissioning Site|
|License Status:||Possession Only License|
|Project Manager:||Jack Hayes|
2.0 Site Status Summary
The facility, located in east-central Oklahoma, was owned and operated by Fansteel Inc. (Fansteel), and from 1957–1989 produced tantalum and columbium metals from ores and tin slags (a byproduct of ore smelting). Tantalum metal is mainly used in the electrical/electronics industry for production of tantalum capacitors. Columbium oxide is used for heat-resistant alloys. FMRI, Inc., the current NRC licensee, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Fansteel and was formed in 2004 as part of the Fansteel bankruptcy settlement and reorganization, for the sole purpose of decommissioning the site.
The Fansteel site is on 52 ha [110 ac] located along the Arkansas River (Mile 395). It is about 4 km [2.5 mi] northeast of Muskogee, Oklahoma, and 66 km [41 mi] southeast of Tulsa, Oklahoma. The site is in an area zoned for industrial use. There are 15 structures on the site that are used for processing and administration. Buildings associated with the ore-processing activities include the Chemical “C” building, the Chemical “A” building, and the research and development laboratory building. Other important facilities on the site are the groundwater treatment facility, the ore storage pad, and the chemical equipment room. Nine ponds were built for site operations. Ponds 1 and 4 have been closed; Ponds 2 and 3, that contain radioactive process residue have been partially remediated. The remaining ponds contain process waste contaminated primarily with chemical materials.
The Fansteel facility extracted tantalum and columbium from uranium ore, thorium ore, and tin slag feedstock by using an acid digestion process. The digestion process did not specifically extract the uranium and thorium from the ore. The radioactive residues from the operations were disposed in acidic Ponds 2, 3, and 5. Pond 4 was used from 1957 until the sewage was routed to the municipal sewage system in 1979. Subsequently, Pond 3 was constructed over Pond 4 and was used for site operations. Acidic water was stored in Pond 1 from 1957–1979. Pretreatment Ponds 1S and 1N were constructed in 1979 above the original Pond 1 and were used from 1981–1990 to store acidic and ammonia waters, respectively. Powdery fines were later removed from Pond 1S and packaged into drums for sale or recovery as tantalum concentrate. Alkaline process water was treated and passed on to settling Ponds 6, 7, 8, and 9. Water was then discharged over a weir into the Arkansas River in accordance with an Oklahoma Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit.
Since 1967, the Fansteel facility has operated with license SMB-911 issued by the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) and its successor, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), because the uranium and thorium concentrations were high enough to cause the ores, slags, and byproducts to be classified as source materials. Plant manufacturing operations terminated in December 1989. From 1989–1996, Fansteel conducted limited site remediation and decommissioning of site areas. During 1990–1992, chemical processing equipment used in the extraction of tantalum and columbium was sold and removed offsite. In 1993, Fansteel conducted a characterization survey to determine existing site contamination. Radioactivity was found throughout the Chemical “C” building, the process ponds, surrounding soils, and groundwater and in isolated areas of other site buildings. Following cleanup activities in 1996, NRC released 14 ha [35 ac] in the northwest portion of the site for unrestricted use. In 1997, the license was amended so ore, calcium fluoride, and wastewater treatment residues containing uranium and thorium in various site impoundments could be reprocessed and reduced in volume. Fansteel also planned to decommission the site for restricted use in accordance with 10 CFR 20.1403, placing the residue of the reprocessing operations in an on-site cell. From 1999–2001, a new chemical extraction process was implemented. In late 2001 Fansteel suspended all operations because of process difficulties and a decline in the price of tantalum, and stated it would remediate the site for release for unrestricted use. It also posted a one-time charge of $32 million for the failed reprocessing facility plus $52 million for the planned decommissioning activities.
In January 2002, Fansteel filed for bankruptcy protection under Chapter 11. Subsequently, NRC drew on the existing financial assurance instruments totaling about $4.5 million and placed the funds in a standby trust. Later in 2002, Fansteel applied for a license renewal, but NRC denied the renewal application because the required decommissioning financial assurance was not provided and the license expired. In January 2003, Fansteel submitted a decommissioning plan (DP) that NRC rejected. Following several discussions, in July 2003, Fansteel submitted a revised DP, a request for exemption from financial assurance requirements, and authorization to transfer the license to a subsidiary (FMRI, Inc.) as part of the bankruptcy reorganization plan. The financial assurance is provided by three unsecured promissory notes. The Primary Note of $30.6 million provides $700,000 twice per year with a balloon payment of the balance dues December 31, 2013. The Secondary Note of $4.2 million provides $282, 000 per year starting in January 2009. The contingent note will be valued at the completion of Phase 3 of the DP. The DP outlines a four-phase approach that first addresses remediation of the most risk-significant areas. Phase 1 of the DP states that the residues in Ponds 2 and 3 must be removed offsite and sent to the White Mesa facility, which Dennison Mines operates near Blanding, Utah. Phase 2 of the DP, that has not commenced, is to remediate Ponds 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9. Phase 3 , that has not commenced, will is to remediate buildings, equipment, and soils; and Phase 4 is to remediate the groundwater. Phases 1–3 were planned to be done in sequence; Phase 4 is ongoing and will continue until groundwater meets regulatory standards. The groundwater remediation by capture and treat is estimated by FMRI to be completed by 2023. NRC approved these requests in December 2003. Most of the residue from Pond 3 was dried, bagged, and shipped between 2005 and 2008. The remainder is stored on site. Portions of Pond 2 have been excavated and that is also in on-site storage.
3.0 Major Technical or Regulatory Issues
FMRI's original schedule showed completion of Phase 1 decommissioning by March 31, 2006. According to its January 2011 letter, FMRI's plan was to complete excavation and shipping of Pond 2 and 3 material in CY 2013. No shipment of waste off-site has occurred since January 2008. In June 2011 FMRI and Fansteel requested authorization for an indirect transfer of control of FMRI from Fansteel to Green Lantern Acquisitions 1 (GLA-1). Fansteel also requested to change the conditions of the Primary Note to eliminate the balloon payment and extend the $700k semi-annual payment scheme. In 2012, NRC approved the proposed indirect transfer of control and denied the change to the note. In March 2013 FMRI informed NRC that the sale to GLA-1 did not occur. Fansteel requested to negotiate the terms of the primary note. NRC asked how much more Fansteel would make in the periodic payments, there being little remediation at the current payment rate, and what would be the schedule. Fansteel stated it would not increase the payments and proposed extending the site remediation schedule to 2024. NRC stated this was not acceptable. NRC continues to pursue an acceptable schedule for site remediation.
The Oklahoma DEQ sent a letter to FMRI in July, 2008 stating the FMRI was not in compliance with its OPDES permit conditions, and it must either close Ponds 6 - 7, line them with an approved synthetic material, or conduct additional ground water monitoring east of the interceptor trench, including in the bedrock, by May, 2010. The schedule for these activities is consistent with Phases 1 and 2 of the approved site DP, including revisions through 2006. However, because of delays in Pond 2 and 3 remediation, there are resulting delays in addressing Ponds 5 - 9.
There is high public interest from the State of Oklahoma, the Cherokee Nation, and the Port of Muskogee.
4.0 Estimated Date For Closure