Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

Forwards "Study of Separation of Function & Ex Parte Rules in NRC Adjudications for Domestic Licensing." Comments on related S.262 & S.2147.Commission opposes any legislation which would decrease flexibility in relaxing rules.W/o encl.

Accession Number: ML19323C504

Date Released: Friday, October 25, 2024

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.

• ML19323C503 - Forwards "Study of Separation of Function & Ex Parte Rules in NRC Adjudications for Domestic Licensing." Comments on related S.262 & S.2147.Commission opposes any legislation which would decrease flexibility in relaxing rules.W/o encl. (4 page(s), 4/15/1980)
• ML19323C506 - Forwards "Study of Separation of Function & Ex Parte Rules in NRC Adjudications for Domestic Licensing." Comments on related S.262 & S.2147.Commission opposes any legislation which would decrease flexibility in relaxing rules.W/o encl. (4 page(s), 4/15/1980)
• ML19323C509 - "Study of Separation of Functions & Ex Parte Rules in NRC Adjudications for Domestic Licensing." (350 page(s), 4/15/1980)
• ML19323C512 - Comments on "Study of Separation of Function & Ex Parte Rules in NRC Adjudications for Domestic Licensing." Study does not make good case for liberalization of rules against private communications by adjudicators w/agency outsiders. (4 page(s), 3/26/1980)
• ML19323C513 - Comments on "Study of Separation of Function & Ex Parte Rules in NRC Adjudications for Domestic Licensing." Present separation of functions rule should be modified per proposal but should otherwise remain unchanged. (4 page(s), 3/28/1980)
• ML19323C516 - Comments on "Study of Separation of Function & Ex Parte Rules in NRC Adjudications for Domestic Licensing." Study should be revised.Author attitude toward separation of functions out-of-line w/Supreme Court & other courts. (2 page(s), 3/19/1980)