Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

Informs that FR notice of denial of petition for rulemaking has been modified to indicate that five rather then four people have submitted comments on petition for rulemaking PRM 20-9.Revised page of notice encl.

Accession Number: ML19276G117

Date Released: Friday, October 25, 2024

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.

• ML19276G116 - Informs that FR notice of denial of petition for rulemaking has been modified to indicate that five rather then four people have submitted comments on petition for rulemaking PRM 20-9.Revised page of notice encl. (2 page(s), 4/9/1979)
• ML19276G119 - Comments on PRM 20-9 re allowable radiation levels for radiographer safety & radioactive transport:suggests 50 is better level than 100 (at 5 cm),but 75 may be suitable compromise. (1 page(s), 7/18/1977)
• ML19276G120 - Comments on PRM 20-9 & PRM 34-1:present limits are pragmatic,providing necessary protection.Recommends petition be denied,as compliance would be too difficult to document & enforce. (1 page(s), 7/18/1977)
• ML19276G122 - Comments on PRM 20-9 & PRM 34-1:new regulations not needed to overcome impracticality & inconsistency of results in determining radiation intensities at surfaces.Changes will be too restrictive. (1 page(s), 7/18/1977)
• ML19276G123 - Comments on PRM 20-9:change restricts operations at nuclear power plants & does not follow ALARA philosophy.Present rule is adequate. (2 page(s), 7/25/1977)
• ML19276G124 - Comments on PRM 20-9:confirms opposition expressed in 770718 telegram.Finds first proposal reasonable,but second & third proposals are unacceptable. (5 page(s), 8/3/1977)
• ML19276G128 - Comments on PRM 20-9:change does not improve quality of survey,nor does it provide better control of external dose rates.Proposed mods would be more impractical than existing regulations. (1 page(s), 8/10/1977)