Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents
Final response to FOIA request for documents.Records in App A & B encl & available in PDR.
Accession Number: ML20136A631
Date Released: Monday, October 28, 2024
Package Contents
The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
- ML20136A625 - Final response to FOIA request for documents.Records in App A & B encl & available in PDR. (4 page(s), 3/5/1997)
- ML20136A850 - Informs of meeting scheduled for 950203 to discuss first eight submittals from Region III & ideas for std format to assure consistent reviews of TI 2515/126. (1 page(s), 2/2/1995)
- ML20136A997 - Discusses 950206 meeting re TI 126 & informs of completed review of second half of Region III submittals. (1 page(s), 2/7/1995)
- ML20136B020 - Discusses 950207 meeting & informs that staff has reviewed first half of Region II submittals & format for summary rept.Next meeting scheduled for 950208. (1 page(s), 2/7/1995)
- ML20138E478 - Temporary Instruction 2515/126, "Evaluation of On-Line Maint." (6 page(s), 10/27/1994)
- ML20136A656 - FOIA request for documents re NRC TI 2515/126, "Evaluation of On-line Maint," including initial phase & any final or follow-up phases. (4 page(s), 2/11/1997)
- ML20138E542 - Forwards TI 2515/126, "Evaluation of On-Line Maint," issued on 941027. (2 page(s), 12/15/1994)
- ML20136A904 - Informs of series of questions/checklist developed at recent meeting to record staff review of TI 2515/126 submittal. (3 page(s), 2/3/1995)
- ML20136A771 - Discusses compressed schedule for review of TI submittal & preparation of summary rept by NRR TI 2515/126 Review Committee.Committee schedule & questions to be addressed when reviewing submittal encl. (2 page(s), 2/2/1995)
- ML20136B039 - Provides results & conclusions from evaluation of insp findings using TI 2515/126, "Evaluation of On-line Maint." (2 page(s), 6/12/1995)
- ML20136A886 - Discusses TI 126 reviews & requests that particular strengths & weaknesses of subj reviews be identified for discussion at upcoming meeting. (2 page(s), 2/3/1995)