Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

Response by CA Energy Commission to licensee motion for summary disposition re G Hursh & R Castro contentions. Contention closely relates to ASLB questions.Motion should be denied to avoid confusion.

Accession Number: ML20126A836

Date Released: Sunday, October 27, 2024

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.

• ML20126A832 - Response by CA Energy Commission to licensee motion for summary disposition re G Hursh & R Castro contentions. Contention closely relates to ASLB questions.Motion should be denied to avoid confusion. (2 page(s), 2/4/1980)
• ML20126A837 - Affidavit by CA Energy Commission re Issue 5-2.Attests that implementation of controlled filtered venting at facility is feasible since equipment is commercially available. (2 page(s), 2/4/1980)
• ML20126A839 - Statement of matl facts by CA Energy Commission (CEC) in support of CEC response to licensee motion for summary disposition of CEC Issue 5-2.Disputes licensee facts re commercial availability of filtered sys.Proof of Svc encl. (5 page(s), 2/4/1980)
• ML20126A844 - Response by CA Energy Commission (CEC) in opposition to licensee 800124 motion for summary disposition re CEC Issue 5-2.General Design Criteria 16 & 50 established in 10CFR50, App A,does not prohibit controlled filtered venting. (8 page(s), 2/4/1980)