Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

Forwards NRC 791002 ltr,specifying grounds for denial of Non-Destructive Testing Mgt Associates 780510 request for removal of App E requirements.Recommends that DOT add same requirements for shipping packages.

Accession Number: ML20125D163

Date Released: Sunday, October 27, 2024

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.

• ML20125D160 - Forwards NRC 791002 ltr,specifying grounds for denial of Non-Destructive Testing Mgt Associates 780510 request for removal of App E requirements.Recommends that DOT add same requirements for shipping packages. (6 page(s), 9/24/1979)
• ML20125D167 - Notice of issuance & availability of denial of Non-Destructive Testing Mgt Associates 780510 petition to remove App E requirements & delay effective date of implementation of regulation until proper hearing conducted. (10 page(s), 10/2/1979)
• ML20125D173 - Notifies of denial of 780510 request for removal of App E requirements & delay of effective date.Adequate notice of regulation was published in FR. (2 page(s), 10/2/1979)
• ML20125D181 - Discusses need to improve compliance w/regulatory requirements for QA programs for packages of radioactive matls.Increased emphasis on QA program will encourage greater self-action by shippers & carriers. (9 page(s), 10/2/1979)
• ML20125D189 - Value/impact assessment of Non-Destructive Testing Mgt Associates 780516 request for removal of App E requirements re QA criteria for shipping packages for radioactive matl. (9 page(s), 9/30/1979)
• ML20125D196 - Requests removal of App E requirements re QA criteria for shipping packages & delay in effective date of implementation.NRC did not notify majority of manufacturers of requirements. (7 page(s), 5/10/1978)
• ML20125D209 - Working paper issue of Reg Guide 7.XX, "Content of Description of QA Program for Use,Maint & Repair of Shipping Packages for Certain Special Form Radioactive Matl." (13 page(s), 5/1/1978)
• ML20125D260 - Comments on Petition for Rulemaking 71-7:regulation forced on industry w/o proper discussion or proof of necessity. (2 page(s), 7/31/1978)
• ML20125D508 - Forwards QA program.Comments on Petition for Rulemaking 71-7:places agreement state licensees in direct conflict w/code requirements.W/o encl. (2 page(s), 12/15/1978)
• ML20125D228 - Comments on Petition for Rulemaking 71-7:QA program duplicates operating & emergency procedures.Commission is trying to require equipment be designed to eliminate human error. (2 page(s), 7/31/1978)
• ML20125D294 - Comments on Petition for Rulemaking 71-7:regulation forced on industry w/o proper discussion or proof of necessity. (1 page(s), 8/4/1978)
• ML20125D380 - Comments on Petition for Rulemaking 71-7:protests NRC attempt to impose requirements of App E on industry. (1 page(s), 8/8/1978)
• ML20125D502 - Comments on Petition for Rulemaking 71-7:increases cost of sources manufactured from Class B quantities. (2 page(s), 8/14/1978)
• ML20125D290 - Comments on Petition for Rulemaking 71-7:10CFR71,App E forced on industry w/o proper discussion or proof of necessity. (1 page(s), 8/4/1978)
• ML20125D374 - Comments on Petition for Rulemaking 71-7:rule would not improve radiographic industry. (1 page(s), 8/8/1978)
• ML20125D454 - Comments on Petition for Rulemaking 71-7:App E criteria imposes tremendous financial burden on licensees. (2 page(s), 8/11/1978)
• ML20125D391 - Comments on Petition for Rulemaking 71-7:item forced on industry w/o proper discussion or proof of necessity. Existing regulations are adequate. (2 page(s), 8/7/1978)
• ML20125D409 - Forwards six comments on Petition for Rulemaking 71-7 from members of Air Transport Association of America.Current regulations are adequate.Rule duplicates present maint programs required for approved license. (8 page(s), 8/11/1978)
• ML20125D429 - Comments on Petition for Rulemaking 71-7:opposes regulation.Transportation of radioactive matl in accordance w/NRC license & manufacturer instructions. (1 page(s), 8/9/1978)
• ML20125D484 - Comments on Petition for Rulemaking 71-7:item forced on industry w/o discussion or proof of necessity.Existing regulations are adequate. (2 page(s), 8/7/1978)
• ML20125D415 - Comments on Petition for Rulemaking 71-7:opposes new regulation.Industry is burdened w/excessive & unnecessary paperwork.Rule would increase inflation by creating more overhead costs. (1 page(s), 8/11/1978)
• ML20125D256 - Comments on Petition for Rulemaking 71-7:proposed change to regulations unwarranted & costly.DOT shipping requirements are adequate. (1 page(s), 8/2/1978)
• ML20125D473 - Comments on Petition for Rulemaking 71-7:increases cost of govt administration & complicates licensee work w/o beneficial effect. (1 page(s), 8/9/1978)
• ML20125D235 - Comments on Petition for Rulemaking 71-7:item forced on industry w/o proper discussion or proof of necessity. (2 page(s), 7/31/1978)
• ML20125D319 - Comments on Petition for Rulemaking 71-7:App E forced on industry w/o proper discussion or proof of necessity. Existing regulations are adequate. (1 page(s), 8/3/1978)
• ML20125D434 - Comments on Petition for Rulemaking 71-7:requests immediate removal of regulations.Industry is overburdened w/ regulations,making competition in world market difficult. (1 page(s), 8/8/1978)
• ML20125D283 - Comments on Petition for Rulemaking 71-7:supports petition to remove regulation.Addl paperwork will necessitate increased prices. (1 page(s), 8/2/1978)
• ML20125D522 - Ack receipt of 781215 ltr & QA program.Comments will be considered in conncetion w/NRC action on petition to revoke App E requirements. (1 page(s), 1/9/1979)
• ML20125D530 - Comments on Petition for Rulemaking 71-7:requests 10-month extension to clarify requirements. (1 page(s), 5/31/1978)
• ML20125D447 - Comments on Petition for Rulemaking 71-7:new regulation will not protect safety of populace.Cost of implementation will be passed on to taxpayers & customers. (1 page(s), 8/11/1978)
• ML20125D233 - Comments on Petition for Rulemaking 71-7:regulation is not necessary.Requests immediate removal. (1 page(s), 7/31/1978)
• ML20125D222 - Comments on Petition for Rulemaking 71-7:item forced on industry w/o proper discussion or proof of necessity. (2 page(s), 7/19/1978)
• ML20125D465 - Comments on Petition for Rulemaking 71-7:requests removal of App E requirements.New regulations needed at state level,not re NRC licensing. (2 page(s), 8/11/1978)
• ML20125D244 - Comments on Petition for Rulemaking 71-7:lack of justification for regulation.Industry has outstanding safety record. (1 page(s), 7/31/1978)
• ML20125D331 - Comments on Petition for Rulemaking 71-7:protests adoption of App E w/increased QA requirements for transportation of nuclear matls. (1 page(s), 8/4/1978)
• ML20125D269 - Comments on Petition for Rulemaking 71-7:requests review of regulation.Rule would require industrial radiographic labs to develop programs superfluous to programs developed by container manufacturers. (1 page(s), 7/31/1978)
• ML20125D249 - Comments on Petition for Rulemaking 71-7:present regulations are adequate.Addl amends should only be added after extensive hearings. (1 page(s), 8/2/1978)
• ML20125D539 - Comments on Petition for Rulemaking 71-7:requests extension of 800701 deadline for completion of QA program. (1 page(s), 6/1/1978)
• ML20125D308 - Comments on Petition for Rulemaking 71-7:App E lacks justification & is totally unnecessary.Regulation will generate increase in cost & place addl burden on industry. (1 page(s), 8/2/1978)
• ML20125D500 - Comments on Petition for Rulemaking 71-7:App E requirements re radiography devices would result in duplication of regulation & generate unnecessary paperwork. (2 page(s), 8/11/1978)
• ML20125D247 - Comments on Petition for Rulemaking 71-7:unnecessary regulations,w/o basis for implementation. (1 page(s), 8/1/1978)
• ML20125D403 - Comments on Petition for Rulemaking 71-7: regulation will place addl cost burden on industry.Costs will be passed on to customers. (1 page(s), 8/7/1978)
• ML20125D230 - Comments on Petition for Rulemaking 71-7:item forced on industry w/o proper discussion or proof of necessity. (2 page(s), 8/1/1978)
• ML20125D394 - Comments on Petition for Rulemaking 71-7:App E forced on industry w/o proper discussion or proof of necessity. Existing regulations are adequate. (2 page(s), 8/7/1978)
• ML20125D240 - Comments on Petition for Rulemaking 71-7:need for regulation not proved.Costs are substantial. (1 page(s), 8/1/1978)
• ML20125D422 - Comments on Petition for Rulemaking 71-7:imposed on industry w/o interchange of communication.Industry is overregulated. (1 page(s), 8/9/1978)
• ML20125D547 - Comments on Petition for Rulemaking 71-7:requests 180-day extension to file description of QA program. (1 page(s), 6/5/1978)