Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

Informs that NRC studying options which could reduce size of or eliminate regional ofc in Walnut Creek,CA.Region V realignment study dtd 930610 encl.

Accession Number: ML20056G560

Date Released: Friday, October 25, 2024

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.

• ML20056G559 - Informs that NRC studying options which could reduce size of or eliminate regional ofc in Walnut Creek,CA.Region V realignment study dtd 930610 encl. (77 page(s), 8/12/1993)
• ML20056G564 - Advises that Commission w/all Commissioners agreeing has agreed that staff should conduct detail study of possible alternatives for realignment of Region V. (1 page(s), 3/30/1993)
• ML20056G571 - Notifies of selection to conduct review of several proposed options for realignment or elimination of Region V ofc. J Montgomery & B Faulkenberry have lead in project. (2 page(s), 3/30/1993)
• ML20056G574 - Request that scope of 930330 study charter group be modified to include listed addl tasks. (13 page(s), 4/20/1993)
• ML20056G583 - Comments on draft Region V realignment study.Author believes group did good job encompassing issues to be considered in realignment of Region V.Provides comments in three areas as indicated. (2 page(s), 6/4/1993)
• ML20056G590 - Presents consolidated comment on Region V realignment study draft rept.Listed comment applies to Option 4. (1 page(s), 6/4/1993)
• ML20056G599 - Submits comments on regional consolidation study.In regards to option 1 or 3,problem of region spanning three time zones have been minimized. (2 page(s), 6/4/1993)
• ML20056G606 - Thanks author for granting opportunity to comment on draft Region V realignment study,per 930524 memo.Study seems to have ignored direction stated in Chilk 930330 memo to Taylor re balancing of workload among regions. (5 page(s), 6/4/1993)
• ML20056G609 - Forwards comments on review of draft Region V realignment study.Author also plans to write to Commissioners re EDO ground rules for study. (3 page(s), 5/28/1993)
• ML20056G637 - Submits comments on draft Region V realignment study for consideration. (1 page(s), 6/4/1993)
• ML20056G638 - Advises that author has completed review of draft Region V realignment study.Author sees no obvious errors in factual info study group as prepared within study group charter. (1 page(s), 9/7/1993)
• ML20056G639 - Submits addl comments on nuclear matls program treatment in draft Region V realignment study.Relocation of matls function to Region IV will reduce svc provided to Western US & pacific territories. (6 page(s), 6/9/1993)
• ML20056G645 - Forwards comments on draft rept on realignment study. (3 page(s), 6/4/1993)
• ML20056G646 - Offers observation on draft Region V realignment study. Study too narrowly constrained & focused.Suggests that two more options be fully considered. (2 page(s), 6/3/1993)
• ML20056G650 - Submits comments on Region IV & V consolidation study rept. (2 page(s), 6/7/1993)
• ML20056G656 - Informs that in reviewing draft Region V realignment study, B Ang & author realized that option 4 had one section chief supervising licensing,engineering inspectors & non-power reactor inspector.Functions too broad for one person. (1 page(s), 6/2/1993)
• ML20056G661 - Expresses concern over info that NRC commissioned study to explore options for consolidation of Regions IV & V. (2 page(s), 9/7/1993)
• ML20056G668 - Comments on realignment study.Numbers do not make sense. Region IV staff augmented by 25 people cannot accomplish Region V mission. (2 page(s), 6/4/1993)
• ML20056G717 - Provides comments on results of study group rept on combining Regions IV & V.Study does not address that Texas has no taxes,constituting significant gain for individuals being transferred. (2 page(s), 6/3/1993)
• ML20056G723 - Comments on draft Region V realignment study.Comments include addl benefits of option 2 not mentioned in rept & addl consideration for option 4. (1 page(s), 9/7/1993)
• ML20056G729 - Comments on draft Region V realignment study.Example on top of page 76,not good because Region IV has been staffed this way for quite some time. (1 page(s), 9/7/1993)
• ML20056G737 - Submits comments on draft Region V realignment study.On page 29 of draft realignment for option 1,addl advantage for combined IV/V should be included. (2 page(s), 9/7/1993)
• ML20056G741 - Informs that NRR has reviewed Region V realignment study options for impacts on implementation on NRR program activities,per 930402 request. (1 page(s), 4/27/1993)
• ML20056G754 - Informs that NMSS has assessed programmatic impact of Region V realignment,per 930402 request.In general,no significant programmatic impacts exist due to relocation.Specific discussion of positive & negative impacts encl. (3 page(s), 4/23/1993)
• ML20056G763 - Submits concerns raised by IRM re Region V realignment study.Lists sys supported by Sys Development Branch that would be affected by consolidation of Regions IV & V. (4 page(s), 4/23/1993)
• ML20056G764 - Provides views on options considered by study group re Region V realignment. (1 page(s), 5/20/1993)