Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

Discusses proposed rule for documentation of differences from revised SRP.NRR has suggested changes to proposed rule & has declared SRP would not be treated as NRC requirement. Addl 30-day comment period recommended.

Accession Number: ML20049H724

Date Released: Friday, October 25, 2024

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.

• ML20049H721 - Discusses proposed rule for documentation of differences from revised SRP.NRR has suggested changes to proposed rule & has declared SRP would not be treated as NRC requirement. Addl 30-day comment period recommended. (2 page(s), 3/1/1982)
• ML20049H728 - Responds to 820217 memo re revised rule requiring OL applicants to identify & evaluate differences from revised SRP (SECY 81-648).Rule should be made applicable to OL applications not yet under review by staff. (4 page(s), 2/25/1982)
• ML20049H737 - Submits postulated cost estimates for implementing SRP. Typical consultant would bid general SRP task at just below one million dollars plus cost fees. (11 page(s), 2/19/1982)