Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

Responds to 891031 ltr re concerns on NRC approach to assessing need for addl controls on tritium.NRC has deferred action on matter pending outcome of DOE inquiries into shipping discrepancies between DOE facilities & customers.

Accession Number: ML19332E107

Date Released: Thursday, October 24, 2024

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.

• ML19332E316 - Responds to 891031 ltr re concerns on NRC approach to assessing need for addl controls on tritium.NRC has deferred action on matter pending outcome of DOE inquiries into shipping discrepancies between DOE facilities & customers. (1 page(s), 11/22/1989)
• ML19332E106 - NRC response to Markey 891031 ltr,Question 1 concerning NRC approach to assessing need for addl controls of tritium. (1 page(s), 10/31/1989)
• ML19332E108 - NRC response to Markey 891031 ltr,Question 2 concerning NRC position re level of safeguards required for possession & shipment of tritium regardless of whether tritium classified as SNM. (1 page(s), 10/31/1989)
• ML19332E109 - NRC response to Markey 891031 ltr,Question 3 concerning NRC insp of licensees to help alleviate concerns that tritium not being used as intended. (1 page(s), 10/31/1989)
• ML19332E112 - Expresses concern that NRC has chosen passive stance towards risk of tritium losses or diversions involving NRC licensees,per 891030 ltr.Response to listed questions re DOE rept requested. (7 page(s), 10/31/1989)