Browns Ferry Unit 1 RecoveryBrowns Ferry Unit 1 (BF1) was shutdown in March 1985, along with Units
2 and 3, for correction of a variety of issues. In May 2002, recovery
of BF1 was authorized and planned by the Board of the Tennessee Valley
Authority. Units 2 and 3 have been previously restarted under NRC oversight.
The NRC staff in the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) and Region
II is coordinating and overseeing the regulatory activities associated
with the recovery effort. On August 14, 2003, NRR issued a Regulatory
Framework for the Restart of Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant, Unit 1. The
letter identified significant regulatory actions that require resolution
before restart. These actions include Generic Communications (i.e, Bulletins,
Generic Letters, and Three Mile Island action plan items), Special Programs,
Commitments, Technical Specification Changes, and other licensing activities.
The letter was the NRC's response to a framework proposed by Tennessee
Valley Authority for BF1 in a December
13, 2002 letter, as supplemented by a February
28, 2003 letter, and a meeting
summary dated May 13, 2003, for a meeting held on April 24, 2003.
The Region II staff will monitor the recovery of Unit 1 via the BF1 Restart
Inspection Program as defined in NRC
Inspection Manual Chapter (IMC) 2509 As described in IMC 2509, the staff initially does not plan to use the Reactor Oversight Process (ROP) for inspection and oversight of BF1 during the extended process prior to returning the unit to operation. The unique circumstances involved with the defueled BF1 make the application of the ROP problematic until the unit returns to power operations. Application of the ROP will be phased in, as described in SECY-03-0123 and IMC 2509 to allow for application of the ROP to areas considered ready for transition. Additionally, SECY-03-0123 describes how the NRC staff initially intends to apply traditional enforcement during the recovery and restart process for BF1. Once incorporated into the ROP, Safety Cornerstone areas will utilize the Significance Determination Process (SDP) to evaluate the significance of any identified violations and issues.
This page includes links to files in non-HTML format. See Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools for more information. Inspection Reports: Meeting Summaries For Meetings Held On: |

