C.7 Tables
C.7 Tables
| Table C.1 Sparseness and proximity measures used to classify potential case study sites | ||
| Sparseness | ||
| Category | ||
| Most sparse | 1. | <40 persons per square mile and no community with 25,000 or more persons within 20 miles |
| 2. | 40 to 60 persons per square mile and no community with 25,000 or more persons within 20 miles | |
| 3. | 60 to 120 persons per square mile or less than 60 persons per square mile with at least one community with 25,000 or more persons within 20 miles | |
| Least sparse | 4. | > 120 persons per square mile within 20 miles |
| Proximity | ||
| Category | ||
| Not in close proximity | 1. | No city with 100,000 or more persons and <50 persons per square mile within 50 miles |
| 2. | No city with 100,000 or more persons and between 50 and 190 persons per square mile within 50 miles | |
| 3. | One or more cities with 100,000 or more persons and <190 persons per square mile within 50 miles | |
| In close proximity | 4. | > 190 persons per square mile within 50 miles |
Source: Adapted from NUREG/CR-2239.
Note: Metric equivalents are as follows:
1 square mile = 2.6 km2
20 miles = 32 km
50 miles = 80 km
| Table C.2 Population classification of each potential case study site | |
| Low | Arkansas Big Rock Point Cooper Hatch Wolf Creek |
| Medium | Bellefonte Crystal River Diablo Canyon Oconee St. Lucie |
| High | Calvert Cliffs D. C. Cook Indian Point Nine Mile Point Peach Bottom Rancho Seco San Onofre Surry Three Mile Island |
| Source: Staff computations. | |
| Table C.3 Case study sites | |||
| Site | Population size | Location | Year(s) licensed |
| Arkansas | Low | Arkansas | 1974, 1978 |
| Wolf Creek | Low | Kansas | 1985 |
| Diablo Canyon | Medium | California | 1984, 1985 |
| Oconee | Medium | South Carolina | 1973, 1973, 1974 |
| D. C. Cook | High | Michigan | 1974, 1977 |
| Indian Point | High | New York | 1973, 1976 |
| Three Mile Island | High | Pennsylvania | 1974 |
| Source: Staff computations; NUREG-0020, vol. 9. | |||
| Table C.4 Currenta operating-period employment at nuclear power plants | |||
| Employment | One-unit plants | Two-unit plants | Three-unit plants |
| Minimum | 201 | 467 | 1750 |
| Maximum | 1800 | 2500 | 3340 |
| Mean | 832 | 1247 | 2404 |
| (Number of plants) | (34) | (28) | (4) |
| aApproximately half the respondents reported data for 1989 and half for 1990. Source: ORNL/NUMARC survey of all utilities (see Section C.1.3). | |||
| Table C.5 Changes in mean operating-period employment at nuclear power plants over time | |||
| Time | One-unit plantsa | Two-unit plantsa | Three-unit plantsa |
| 1989/1990b | 832 (34) | 1247 (28) | 2404 (4) |
| 1985-1989 | 841 (30) | 1094 (26) | 2095 (4) |
| 1980-1984 | 447 (19) | 946 (21) | 1078 (3) |
| 1975-1979 | 233 (17) | 515 (16) | 699 (3) |
| aNumber in parentheses indicates number of plants providing data. bApproximately half the respondents reported data for 1989 and half for 1990. Source: ORNL/NUMARC survey of all utilities (see Section C.1.3). | |||
| Table C.6 Employment, cost, and time associated with typical planned outage at nuclear power plants | |||
| Employment | Total no. of workers | Cost ($ x 106) | Length of outage (days) |
| Minimum | 60 | 4.5 | 32 |
| Maximum | 2600 | 56.5 | 139 |
| Mean | 783 | 21.7 | 76 |
| (Number of plants) | (58) | (39) | (62) |
| Source: ORNL/NUMARC survey of all utilities (see Section C.1.3). | |||
| Table C.7 Employment, cost, and time associated with an in-service inspection outage at nuclear power plants | |||
| Employment | Total no. of workers | Cost ($ x 106) | Length of outage (days) |
| Minimum | 35 | 1.6 | 16 |
| Maximum | 1986 | 40.0 | 325 |
| Mean | 734 | 22.0 | 107 |
| (Number of plants) | (23) | (14) | (27) |
| Source: ORNL/NUMARC survey of all utilities (see Section C.1.3). | |||
| Table C.8 Employment, cost, and time associated with largest single outage at nuclear power plants | |||
| Employment | Total no. of workers | Cost ($ x 106) | Length of outage (days) |
| Minimum | 80 | 5.4 | 43 |
| Maximum | 3000 | 210.0 | 1,004 |
| Mean | 1223 | 53.7 | 199 |
| (Number of plants) | (45) | (30) | (41) |
| Source: ORNL/NUMARC survey of all utilities (see Section C.1.3). | |||
| Table C.9 Currenta assessed value of nuclear power plants (in dollars) | |||
| One-unit plants | Two-unit plants | Three-unit plants | |
| Minimum | 8,309,867 | 16,619,733 | 40,514,729 |
| Maximum | 4,351,797,390 | 8,023,653,676 | 12,035,480,510 |
| Mean | 732,615,112 | 1,113,824,421 | 4,283,239,036 |
| (Number of plants) | (23) | (21) | (4) |
| aApproximately half the respondents reported data for 1989 and half for 1990. Source: ORNL/NUMARC survey of all utilities (see Section C.1.3). | |||
| Table C.10 Past assessed value of nuclear power plants (in dollars) | ||||||
| One-unit plants | Two-unit plants | Three-unit plants | ||||
| Value | 1980 | 1985 | 1980 | 1985 | 1980 | 1985 |
| Minimum | 6,542,066 | 7,957,867 | 13,084,133 | 15,915,733 | 341,222,806 | 1,147,319,438 |
| Maximum | 460,383,107 | 2,195,586,755 | 4,309,013,892 | 6,645,073,248 | 6,463,520,838 | 9,967,609,872 |
| Mean | 137,952,092 | 409,168,905 | 497,568,490 | 943,272,817 | 2,454,988,141 | 4,281,860,682 |
| (Number of plants) | (17) | (19) | (19) | (19) | (3) | (3) |
| Source: ORNL/NUMARC survey of all utilities (see Section C.1.3). | ||||||
| Table C.11 Currenta taxes paid by nuclear power plants (in dollars) | |||
| One-unit plants | Two-unit plants | Three-unit plants | |
| Minimum local | 19,000 | 16,617 | 5,510,003 |
| Minimum state | 229,000 | 42,183 | 10,215,660 |
| Minimum total | 19,000 | 750,000 | 5,510,003 |
| Maximum local | 33,786,685 | 34,132,316 | 91,262,791 |
| Maximum state | 37,540,707 | 92,792,182 | 139,118,273 |
| Maximum total | 52,000,000 | 92,792,182 | 139,118,273 |
| Mean local | 8,740,879 | 8,172,250 | 48,386,397 |
| Mean state | 14,600,201 | 28,011,507 | 74,701,967 |
| Mean total | 12,647,941 | 19,360,839 | 69,066,815 |
| (No. paying local taxes) | (21) | (19) | (2) |
| (No. paying state taxes) | (6) | (9) | (2) |
| (Total no. reporting) | (29) | (23) | (4) |
| aApproximately half the
respondents reported data for 1989 and half for 1990. Source: ORNL/NUMARC survey of all utilities (see Section C.1.3). | |||
| Table C.12 Past taxes paid by nuclear power plants (in dollars) | ||||||
| One-unit plants | Two-unit plants | Three-unit plants | ||||
| 1980 | 1985 | 1980 | 1985 | 1980 | 1985 | |
| Minimum local | 77,196 | 21,000 | 11,624 | 13,765 | 10,373,174 | 30,059,769 |
| Minimum state | 182,564 | 184,000 | 35,355 | 37,813 | 4,265,285 | 4,589,278 |
| Minimum total | 529,692 | 21,000 | 617,000 | 695,000 | 13,221,211 | 34,649,047 |
| Maximum local | 9,832,452 | 16,273,095 | 10,800,000 | 27,969,568 | 10,373,174 | 30,059,769 |
| Maximum state | 33,266,428 | 37,487,911 | 66,532,857 | 75,299,185 | 68,205,671 | 112,948,777 |
| Maximum total | 33,343,625 | 37,615,236 | 66,687,249 | 75,299,185 | 68,205,671 | 112,948,777 |
| Mean local | 3,720,242 | 6,240,207 | 4,156,061 | 7,527,656 | 10,373,174 | 30,059,769 |
| Mean state | 12,039,844 | 12,962,231 | 17,264,470 | 25,825,159 | 36,235,478 | 58,769,028 |
| Mean total | 5,184,430 | 8,400,823 | 10,807,676 | 17,441,883 | 32,021,780 | 61,238,849 |
| (No. paying local taxes) | (15) | (19) | (16) | (16) | (1) | (1) |
| (No. paying state taxes) | (3) | (5) | (8) | (8) | (2) | (2) |
| (Total no. reporting) | (20) | (25) | (21) | (21) | (3) | (3) |
| Source: ORNL/NUMARC survey of all utilities (see Section C.1.3). | ||||||
| Table C.13 Population growth associated with Arkansas Nuclear One: Pope County, Arkansas, 1970-1989 | ||||||
| Work force | Project-related in-migrant populationa | County's total populationb | Increase as % of total | |||
| Year | Construction | Operations | Total | |||
| 1970 | 420 | 0 | 420 | 846 | 28,607 | 3.0 |
| 1974 | 1,100 | 248 | 1,348 | 2,756 | 33,200 | 8.3 |
| 1975 | 928 | 293 | 1,221 | 2,576 | 33,600 | 7.7 |
| 1980 | 0 | 462 | 462 | 682 | 39,021 | 1.7 |
| 1985 | 0 | 1,984 | 1,984 | 2,736 | 42,109 | 6.5 |
| 1989 | 0 | 2,205 | 2,205 | 3,418 | 45,883c | 7.4 |
| aIncludes both direct and
indirect workers and their
families. bPopulation assumed to grow at a constant annual rate between known points. c1990 U.S. Census figure used. Sources: NUREG/CR-2749, vol. 1, pp. 20, 26, and 86; AP&L 1990; ORNL staff computations. | ||||||
| Table C.14 Estimated plant-related population growth in Pope County, Arkansas, 1989 | |
| Direct growth | |
| Number of direct workers | 2205 |
| Number of study area residents (90% of total) | 1985 |
| Number of in-migrants (56.2% of residents) | 1116 |
| Number of in-migrants with families (60%) | 670 |
| Average family size | x 3.06 |
| Total in-migrants plus families | 2050 |
| Number of in-migrants without families (40%) | +446 |
| Total direct growth | 2496 |
| Indirect growth | |
| Ratio indirect/direct jobs | 0.39 |
| Number of indirect workers | 860 |
| Number of study area residents (96% of total) | 826 |
| Number of in-migrants (55% of residents) | 454 |
| Number of in-migrants with families (50%) | 227 |
| Average family size | x 3.06 |
| Total in-migrants plus families | 695 |
| Number of in-migrants without families (50%) | +227 |
| Total indirect growth | 922 |
| Total growth | |
| Total direct growth | 2496 |
| Total indirect growth | + 922 |
| Total estimated plant-related growth | 3418 |
| Sources: Number of direct workers and percentage of study area residents from AP&L 1990. Average family size from 1990 U.S. Census of Population. Other data from NUREG/CR-2749, vol. 1, pp. 56-86; ORNL staff computations. | |
| Table C.15 Projected refurbishment-related population growth in Pope County, Arkansas, 2013 | |
| Direct growth | |
| Number of direct workers | 2273 |
| Number of study area residents (65% of total) | 1477 |
| Number of in-migrants (56.2% of residents) | 830 |
| Number of in-migrants with families (60%) | 498 |
| Average family size | x 3.06 |
| Total in-migrants plus families | 1524 |
| Number of in-migrants without families (40%) | +332 |
| Total direct growth | 1856 |
| Indirect growth | |
| Ratio indirect/direct jobs | 0.208 |
| Number of indirect workers | 473 |
| Number of study area residents (96% of total) | 454 |
| Number of in-migrants (54.2% of residents) | 246 |
| Number of in-migrants with families (50%) | 123 |
| Average family size | x 3.06 |
| Total in-migrants plus families | 376 |
| Number of in-migrants without families (50%) | 123 |
| Total indirect growth | 499 |
| Total growth | |
| Total direct growth | 1856 |
| Total indirect growth | 400 |
| Total projected refurbishment-related growth | 2355 |
| Sources: Direct workers from SEA 1994. Average family size from 1990 U.S. Census of Population. Other data from NUREG/CR-2749, vol. 1, pp. 56-86; ORNL staff computations. | |
| Table C.16 Projected plant-related population growth in Pope County, Arkansas, during the license renewal term | |
| Direct growth | |
| Number of direct workers | 120 |
| Number of study area residents (90% of total) | 108 |
| Number of in-migrants (56.2% of residents) | 61 |
| Number of in-migrants with families (60%) | 37 |
| Average family size | x 3.06 |
| Total in-migrants plus families | 113 |
| Number of in-migrants without families (40%) | +24 |
| Total direct growth | 137 |
| Indirect growth | |
| Ratio indirect/direct jobs | 0.39 |
| Number of indirect workers | 47 |
| Number of study area residents (96% of total) | 45 |
| Number of in-migrants (55% of residents) | 25 |
| Number of in-migrants with families (50%) | 13 |
| Average family size | x 3.06 |
| Total in-migrants plus families | 40 |
| Number of in-migrants without families (50%) | +12 |
| Total indirect growth | 52 |
| Total growth | |
| Total direct growth | 137 |
| Total indirect growth | +52 |
| Total estimated operations-related growth | 189 |
| Sources: Direct workers from NRC work force estimates (1989). Average family size from 1990 U.S. Census of Population. Other data from NUREG/CR-2749, vol. 1, pp. 56-86; ORNL staff computations. | |
| Table C.17 Arkansas Nuclear One (ANO) station assessed value and taxes paid to Pope County, 1968-1989, in current dollars | |||||
|
Assessed value ($) |
ANO valuation as % of county valuation | Millage | Taxes paid by ANO ($) | ||
| Year | Pope County | ANO | |||
| 1968 | 17,100,000 | 930,053 | 5.4 | .057 | 53,093 |
| 1972 | 52,607,000 | 25,817,219 | 49.1 | .064 | 1,652,302 |
| 1976 | 136,640,000 | 100,589,373 | 73.6 | .059 | 5,934,773 |
| 1980 | 193,993,250 | 142,718,270 | 73.6 | .0107 | 1,529,051 |
| 1985 | 334,683,819 | 173,679,771 | 51.9 | .0091 | 1,583,831 |
| 1989 | 410,290,842 | 189,419,497 | 46.2 | .0064 | 1,204,632 |
| Sources: NUREG/CR-2749, vol. 1; Duval 1990; Rye 1990. | |||||
| Table C.18 Arkansas Nuclear One (ANO) Station project revenue impact to Russellville School District | ||||||
| Year | Total assessed valuation ($ x 106) | School district revenues ($ x 103) | ANO revenues as % of | |||
| Total | Property taxes | ANO taxes | Property taxes | Total revenuesa | ||
| 1968 | 14.9 | NAb | 745 | 46.5 | 6.2 | NA |
| 1970 | 19.9 | NA | 995 | 189.2 | 19.0 | NA |
| 1972 | 44.3 | 2600 | 2215 | 1290.9 | 58.3 | 49.7 |
| 1974 | 81.7 | 4958 | 4085 | 3246.6 | 79.5 | 65.5 |
| 1976 | 125.6 | 7898 | 6280 | 5029.5 | 80.1 | 63.7 |
| 1977 | 142.2 | 8740 | 7110 | 5739.6 | 80.7 | 65.7 |
| 1980 | NA | NA | NA | 6950.2 | NA | NA |
| 1985 | NA | NA | NA | 6816.1 | NA | NA |
| 1989 | 341.1 | 12,574 | 7675 | 5222.3 | 68.0 | 41.5 |
| aTotal revenues consist of
revenues from property assessments and state and federal funding
sources. bNA = not applicable. Source: NUREG/CR-2749, vol. 1; Pope County 1980, 1985, and 1989; Rye 1990; Duval 1990. | ||||||
| Table C.19 Estimated economic effects of Arkansas Nuclear One on Pope County | |||
| 1974 | 1978 | 1989 | |
| Employment | |||
| Direct basic | 889 | 772 | 1,985 |
| Indirect | 75 | 127 | 826 |
| Total | 964 | 899 | 2,811 |
| Percentage of study area employment | 6.4 | 5.3 | 11.6 |
|
Income (1989 $) | |||
| Direct | 20,679,000 | 26,656,000 | 73,713,000 |
| Indirect | 1,886,000 | 3,421,000 | 12,446,000 |
| Total | 22,565,000 | 30,077,000 | 86,159,000 |
| Percentage of study area income | 7.5 | 7.8 | 14.3 |
| Source: For 1974 and 1978 estimates, NUREG/CR-2749, vol. 1. The 1989 estimate is based on the approach used in the Mountain West study. | |||
| Table C.20 Projected employment effects of Arkansas Nuclear One (ANO) refurbishment on Pope County, 2013 | |
| Refurbishment direct employment | 1477 |
| Refurbishment indirect employment | 454 |
| Total ANO-related employment | 1931 |
| Percentage of Pope County employment | 5.8 |
| Source: ORNL staff computations based on the approach used in the Mountain West study (NUREG/CR-2749, vol. 1). | |
| Table C.21 Projected employment effects of Arkansas Nuclear One license renewal on Pope County, 2013 | |
| Existing total direct and indirect plant-related employment | 2811 |
| Increase in direct employment | 108 |
| Increase in indirect employment | 45 |
| Total plant-related employment | 2964 |
| Percentage of Pope County employment | 8.9 |
| Source: ORNL staff computations based on the approach used in the Mountain West study (NUREG/CR-2749, vol. 1). | |
| Table C.22 Population growth associated with D. C. Cook: Bridgman/Lake Township and Berrien County, 1970-1990 | |||||||||
|
Work force |
Bridgman/Lake Township | Berrien County | |||||||
| Year | Construction | Operations | Total | Project-related in-migrant populationa | Area's total populationb | Project-related population as % of total | Project-related in-migrant populationa | County's total populationb | Project-related population as % of total |
| 1970 | 914 | 24 | 938 | 61 | 3,767 | 1.6 | 802 | 163,875 | 0.5 |
| 1972 | 2,377 | 148 | 2,525 | 175 | 3,782 | 4.6 | 2,193 | 167,000 | 1.3 |
| 1975 | 292 | 279 | 571 | 72 | 3,910 | 1.8 | 595 | 170,100 | 0.3 |
| 1980 | 0 | 746 | 746 | 81 | 4,514 | 1.8 | 644 | 171,267 | 0.4 |
| 1985 | 0 | 1,110 | 1,110 | 108 | 4,386 | 2.5 | 877 | 163,600 | 0.5 |
| 1990 | 0 | 1,252 | 1,252 | 141 | 4,627 | 3.0 | 1,109 | 161,378 | 0.7 |
| aIncludes both direct and
indirect workers and
families. bPopulation assumed to grow at constant annual rate between known points. Sources: NUREG/CR-2749, vol. 4, p. 115; Indiana and Michigan Power Company 1990; U.S. Bureau of the Census 1990; ORNL staff computations. | |||||||||
| Table C.23 Estimated plant-related population growth in Bridgman/Lake Township, Michigan, 1990 | |
| Direct growth | |
| Number of direct workers | 1252 |
| Number of study area residents (10.6% of total) | 133 |
| Number of in-migrants (46% of residents) | 61 |
| Number of in-migrants with families (60%) | 37 |
| Average family size | x 3.16 |
| Total in-migrants plus families | 117 |
| Number of in-migrants without families (40%) | +24 |
| Total direct growth | 141 |
| Indirect growth | |
| Ratio indirect/direct jobs | 0.339 |
| Number of indirect workers | 424 |
| Number of study area residents (3.5% of total) | 15 |
| Number of in-migrants (0% of residents) | 0 |
| Number of in-migrants with families (0%) | 0 |
| Average family size | x 3.16 |
| Total in-migrants plus families | 0 |
| Number of in-migrants without families (0%) | +0 |
| Total indirect growth | 0 |
| Total growth | |
| Total direct growth | 141 |
| Total indirect growth | +0 |
| Total estimated plant-related growth | 141 |
| Sources: Number of direct workers from Indiana and Michigan Power Company 1990. Average family size from 1990 U.S. Census of Population. Other data from NUREG/CR-2749, vol. 4, pp. 88-115; ORNL staff computations. | |
| Table C.24 Estimated plant-related population growth in Berrien County, Michigan, 1990 | |
| Direct growth | |
| Number of direct workers | 1252 |
| Number of study area residents (80% of total) | 1002 |
| Number of in-migrants (46% of residents) | 461 |
| Number of in-migrants with families (60%) | 277 |
| Average family size | x 3.16 |
| Total in-migrants plus families | 875 |
| Number of in-migrants without families (40%) | +184 |
| Total direct growth | 1059 |
| Indirect growth | |
| Ratio indirect/direct jobs | 0.339 |
| Number of indirect workers | 424 |
| Number of study area residents (95% of total) | 403 |
| Number of in-migrants (5.5% of residents) | 22 |
| Number of in-migrants with families (60%) | 13 |
| Average family size | x 3.16 |
| Total in-migrants plus families | 41 |
| Number of in-migrants without families (40%) | +9 |
| Total indirect growth | 50 |
| Total growth | |
| Total direct growth | 1059 |
| Total indirect growth | +50 |
| Total estimated plant-related growth | 1109 |
| Sources: Number of direct workers from Indiana and Michigan Power Company 1990. Average family size from 1990 U.S. Census of Population. Other data from NUREG/CR-2749, vol. 4, pp. 88-115; ORNL staff computations. | |
| Table C.25 Projected refurbishment-related population growth in Berrien County, Michigan, 2014 | |
| Direct growth | |
| Number of direct workers | 2273 |
| Number of study area residents (66% of total) | 1500 |
| Number of in-migrants (55.3% of residents) | 830 |
| Number of in-migrants with families (50%) | 415 |
| Average family size | x 3.16 |
| Total in-migrants plus families | 1311 |
| Number of in-migrants without families (50%) | +415 |
| Total direct growth | 1726 |
| Indirect growth | |
| Ratio indirect/direct jobs | 0.366 |
| Number of indirect workers | 832 |
| Number of study area residents (95% of total) | 790 |
| Number of in-migrants (5.4% of residents) | 43 |
| Number of in-migrants with families (60%) | 26 |
| Average family size | x 3.16 |
| Total in-migrants plus families | 82 |
| Number of in-migrants without families (40%) | +17 |
| Total indirect growth | 99 |
| Total growth | |
| Total direct growth | 1726 |
| Total indirect growth | 99 |
| Total projected refurbishment-related growth | 1825 |
| Sources: Direct workers from SEA 1994. Average family size from 1990 U.S. Census of Population. Other data from NUREG/CR-2749, vol. 4, pp. 88-115; ORNL staff computations. | |
| Table C.26 Projected refurbishment-related population growth in Bridgman/Lake Township, Michigan, 2014 | |
| Direct growth | |
| Number of direct workers | 2273 |
| Number of study area residents (5.4% of total) | 123 |
| Number of in-migrants (55.3% of residents) | 68 |
| Number of in-migrants with families (50%) | 34 |
| Average family size | x 3.16 |
| Total in-migrants plus families | 107 |
| Number of in-migrants without families (50%) | + 34 |
| Total direct growth | 141 |
| Indirect growth | |
| Ratio indirect/direct jobs | 0.366 |
| Number of indirect workers | 832 |
| Number of study area residents (3.5% of total) | 29 |
| Number of in-migrants (0% of residents) | 0 |
| Number of in-migrants with families (0%) | 0 |
| Average family size | x 3.16 |
| Total in-migrants plus families | 0 |
| Number of in-migrants without families (0%) | + 0 |
| Total indirect growth | 0 |
| Total growth | |
| Total direct growth | 141 |
| Total indirect growth | 0 |
| Total projected refurbishment-related growth | 141 |
| Sources: Direct workers from SEA 1994. Average family size from 1990 U.S. Census of Population. Other data from NUREG/CR-2749, vol. 4, pp. 88-115; ORNL staff computations. | |
| Table C.27 Projected plant-related population growth in Berrien County, Michigan, during the license renewal term | |
| Direct growth | |
| Number of direct workers | 120 |
| Number of study area residents (80% of total) | 96 |
| Number of in-migrants (46% of residents) | 44 |
| Number of in-migrants with families (60%) | 26 |
| Average family size | x 3.16 |
| Total in-migrants plus families | 82 |
| Number of in-migrants without families (40%) | + 18 |
| Total direct growth | 100 |
| Indirect growth | |
| Ratio indirect/direct jobs | 0.339 |
| Number of indirect workers | 41 |
| Number of study area residents (95% of total) | 39 |
| Number of in-migrants (5.4% of residents) | 2 |
| Number of in-migrants with families (60%) | 1 |
| Average family size | x 3.16 |
| Total in-migrants plus families | 3 |
| Number of in-migrants without families (40%) | + 1 |
| Total indirect growth | 4 |
| Total growth | |
| Total direct growth | 100 |
| Total indirect growth | + 4 |
| Total projected plant-related growth | 104 |
| Sources: Direct workers from NRC work force estimates (1989). Percentage of study area residents from Indiana and Michigan Power Company 1990. Average family size from 1990 U.S. Census of Population. Other data from NUREG/CR-2749, vol. 4, pp. 88-115; ORNL staff computations. | |
| Table C.28 Projected plant-related population growth in Bridgman/Lake Township, Michigan, during the license renewal term | |
| Direct growth | |
| Number of direct workers | 120 |
| Number of study area residents (10.6% of total) | 13 |
| Number of in-migrants (46% of residents) | 6 |
| Number of in-migrants with families (60%) | 4 |
| Average family size | x 3.16 |
| Total in-migrants plus families | 13 |
| Number of in-migrants without families (40%) | + 2 |
| Total direct growth | 15 |
| Indirect growth | |
| Ratio indirect/direct jobs | 0.339 |
| Number of indirect workers | 41 |
| Number of study area residents (3.5% of total) | 1 |
| Number of in-migrants (0% of residents) | 0 |
| Number of in-migrants with families (0%) | 0 |
| Average family size | x 3.16 |
| Total in-migrants plus families | 0 |
| Number of in-migrants without families (0%) | + 0 |
| Total indirect growth | 0 |
| Total growth | |
| Total direct growth | 15 |
| Total indirect growth | + 0 |
| Total projected plant-related growth | 15 |
| Sources: Direct workers from NRC work force estimates (1989). Percentage of study area residents from Indiana and Michigan Power Company 1990. Average family size from 1990 U.S. Census of Population. Other data from NUREG/CR-2749, vol. 4, pp. 88-115; ORNL staff computations. | |
| Table C.29 Berrien County revenues (constant 1988 dollars) | |||||
| Fiscal year | Property taxes | State aid | Charges for services | Other | Total |
| 1967 | |||||
| Amount ($) | 7,668,000 | NAa | NA | NA | 10,343,653 |
| Percentage of total revenues | 74.1 | 100 | |||
| 1972 | |||||
| Amount ($) | 9,021,603 | 2,032,351 | 1,261,970 | 586,184 | 12,902,108 |
| Percentage of total revenues | 69.9 | 15.8 | 9.8 | 4.5 | 100 |
| 1978 | |||||
| Amount ($) | 10,651,576 | 5,959,953 | 1,845,206 | 2,253,562 | 20,710,297 |
| Percentage of total revenues | 51.4 | 28.8 | 8.9 | 10.9 | 100 |
| 1988 | |||||
| Amount ($) | 11,859,469 | 3,544,135b | 3,079,413 | 1,803,630 | 20,289,597c |
| Percentage of total revenues | 58.5 | 17.5 | 15.2 | 8.9 | 100 |
aNA = not
applicable.
bThis state aid includes
$1,975,440 from income tax diversion.
cThere
was an unexplained discrepancy of $2950 in audit report for the year ending
December 31, 1988.
Sources: NUREG/CR-2749, vol. 4; Berrien County
1989.
| Table C.30 Equalized assessed valuation of D. C. Cook Nuclear Plant as a percentage of total equalized assessed value for taxing jurisdictions | |||||
| Jurisdiction | 1967 | 1973 | 1976 | 1980 | 1988 |
| Berrien County | 0 | 5.7 | 12.6 | 20.7 | 21.5 |
| Lake Township | 0 | 79.7 | 86.7 | 90.0 | 90.6 |
| Bridgman School District | 0 | 68.9 | 79.9 | 82.9 | 88.0 |
| Sources: NUREG/CR-2749, vol. 4; Schuller 1990; Stockman 1990; Winslow 1990. | |||||
| Table C.31 Distribution of property tax payments from D. C. Cook to various taxing jurisdictions/recipients in 1989 | ||
| Millage | D. C. Cook's tax contributionat SEVa of $531,797,266 | |
| County, general | 5.3908 | $2,866,813 |
| Lake Township, general | 1.0000 | 531,797 |
| Lake Michigan College | 2.0414 | 1,085,611 |
| Intermediate School District, general | 0.1976 | 105,083 |
| Intermediate School District, special education | 2.4827 | 1,320,293 |
| Bridgman School District | 8.376 | 4,454,334 |
| Lake Township sewer | 2.4 | 1,276,313 |
| Lake Township water | 1.9 | 1,010,415 |
| Senior Center | 0.2314 | 123,058 |
| 911 special phone assistant | 0.1987 | 105,668 |
| Drug abuse | 0.12 | 63,816 |
| Total levy | 24.3386 | 12,943,201 |
| a SEV = state equalized
value. Sources: Millage rates, Schuller 1990; SEV for D. C. Cook Nuclear Plant, Stockman 1990. | ||
| Table C.32 Estimated economic effects of D. C. Cook on Bridgman/Lake Township | |||
| 1972 | 1978 | 1990 | |
| Employment | |||
| Direct basic | 137 | 82 | 133 |
| Secondary | 3 | 8 | 15 |
| Total | 140 | 90 | 148 |
| Percentage of study area employment | 8.8 | 4.7 | 7.7 |
|
Income (1989 $) | |||
| Direct | 6,312,000 | 2,878,000 | 4,951,000 |
| Secondary | 70,000 | 114,000 | 234,000 |
| Total | 6,382,000 | 2,992,000 | 5,185,000 |
| Percentage of study area income | 14.4 | 5.3 | 8.8 |
| Source: For 1972 and 1978 estimates, NUREG/CR-2749, vol. 4. The 1990 estimate is based on the approach used in the Mountain West study. | |||
|
Table C.33 Projected employment effects of D. C. Cook refurbishment, 2014 | ||
| Area affected | Bridgman/Lake Township | Berrien County |
| Refurbishment direct employment | 123 | 1500 |
| Refurbishment indirect employment | 29 | 790 |
| Total D. C. Cook-related employment | 152 | 2290 |
| Percentage of study area employment | 7.5 | 3.3 |
| Source: ORNL staff computations based on the approach used in NUREG/CR-2749, vol. 4. | ||
| Table C.34 Projected employment and economic effects of D. C. Cook license renewal, 2013 | ||
| Area affected | Bridgman/Lake Township | Berrien County |
| Existing direct and indirect plant-related employment | 148 | 1405 |
| Increase in direct employment | 13 | 96 |
| Increase in indirect employment | 1 | 39 |
| Total plant-related employment | 162 | 1540 |
| Percentage of study area total employment | 8.1 | 1.8 |
| Source: ORNL staff computations based on the approach used in NUREG/CR-2749, vol. 4. | ||
| Table C.35 Population growth associated with Diablo Canyon: San Luis Obispo County, California, 1970-1990 | ||||||
| Year | Work force | Project-related in-migrant populationa | County's total populationb | Project-related population as % of total | ||
| Construction | Operations | Total | ||||
| 1970 | 705 | 0 | 705 | 1,102 | 105,690 | 1.0 |
| 1975 | 2,116 | 0 | 2,116 | 3,308 | 126,500 | 2.6 |
| 1979 | 1,472 | 0 | 1,472 | 2,473 | 147,718 | 1.7 |
| 1985 | 0 | 764 | 764 | 980 | 192,218 | 0.5 |
| 1990 | 0 | 1,300 | 1,300 | 2,149 | 217,162 | 1.0 |
| aIncludes both direct and
indirect workers and
families. bPopulation assumed to grow at a constant annual rate between known points. Sources: NUREG/CR-2749, vol. 5, p. 89; PG&E 1990; ORNL staff computations. | ||||||
| Table C.36 Estimated plant-related population growth in San Luis Obispo County, California, 1990 | |
| Direct growth | |
| Number of direct workers | 1300 |
| Number of study area residents (89.2% of total) | 1160 |
| Number of in-migrants (70% of residents) | 812 |
| Number of in-migrants with families (66%) | 536 |
| Average family size | x 3.32 |
| Total in-migrants plus families | 1780 |
| Number of in-migrants without families (33%) | +276 |
| Total direct growth | 2056 |
| Indirect growth | |
| Ratio indirect/direct jobs | 0.64 |
| Number of indirect workers | 832 |
| Number of study area residents (90% of total) | 749 |
| Number of in-migrants (5.0% of residents) | 37 |
| Number of in-migrants with families (66%) | 24 |
| Average family size | x 3.32 |
| Total in-migrants plus families | 80 |
| Number of in-migrants without families (33%) | +13 |
| Total indirect growth | 93 |
| Total growth | |
| Total direct growth | 2056 |
| Total indirect growth | +93 |
| Total estimated plant-related growth | 2149 |
| Sources: Number of direct workers and percentage of study area residents from PG&E 1990. Average family size from 1990 U.S. Census of Population. Other data from NUREG/CR-2749, vol. 5; ORNL staff computations. | |
| Table C.37 Projected refurbishment-related population growth in San Luis Obispo County, California, 2023 | |
| Direct growth | |
| Number of direct workers | 2273 |
| Number of study area residents (85% of total) | 1932 |
| Number of in-migrants (72.5% of residents) | 1401 |
| Number of in-migrants with families (61.7%) | 864 |
| Average family size | x 3.32 |
| Total in-migrants plus families | 2868 |
| Number of in-migrants without families (38.3%) | +537 |
| Total direct growth | 3405 |
| Indirect growth | |
| Ratio indirect/direct jobs | 0.64 |
| Number of indirect workers | 1455 |
| Number of study area residents (95% of total) | 1310 |
| Number of in-migrants (5.2% of residents) | 68 |
| Number of in-migrants with families (100%) | 68 |
| Average family size | x 3.32 |
| Total in-migrants plus families | 226 |
| Number of in-migrants without families (0%) | +0 |
| Total indirect growth | 226 |
| Total growth | |
| Total direct growth | 3405 |
| Total indirect growth | +226 |
| Total projected refurbishment-related growth | 3631 |
| Sources: Direct workers from SEA 1994. Average family size from 1990 U.S. Census of Population. Other data from NUREG/CR-2749, vol. 5, pp. 55-85; ORNL staff computations. | |
| Table C.38 Projected plant-related population growth in San Luis Obispo County, California, during the license renewal term | |
| Direct growth | |
| Number of direct workers | 120 |
| Number of study area residents (89.2% of total) | 107 |
| Number of in-migrants (70% of residents) | 75 |
| Number of in-migrants with families (66%) | 50 |
| Average family size | x 3.32 |
| Total in-migrants plus families | 166 |
| Number of in-migrants without families (33%) | +25 |
| Total direct growth | 191 |
| Indirect growth | |
| Ratio indirect/direct jobs | 0.64 |
| Number of indirect workers | 77 |
| Number of study area residents (90% of total) | 69 |
| Number of in-migrants (5.0% of residents) | 3 |
| Number of in-migrants with families (66%) | 2 |
| Average family size | x 3.32 |
| Total in-migrants plus families | 7 |
| Number of in-migrants without families (33%) | +1 |
| Total indirect growth | 8 |
| Total growth | |
| Total direct growth | 191 |
| Total indirect growth | +8 |
| Total projected refurbishment-related growth | 199 |
| Sources: Number of direct workers from NRC work force estimates (1989). Percentage of study area residents from PG&E 1990. Average family size from 1990 U.S. Census of Population. Other data from NUREG/CR-2749, vol. 5; ORNL staff computations. | |
| Table C.39 County basic tax rates, property tax levies, and total county revenues for San Luis Obispo County, 1968-1989 | ||||
|
Fiscal year |
County basic tax rate (%) | Est. county basic property tax levy ($ x 103) |
Total county general revenues ($ x 103) |
Property tax as % of total |
| 1967-68 | 2.69 | 6,721.9 | 18,190.9 | 37.0 |
| 1969-70 | 2.96 | 7,683.7 | 22,066.1 | 34.8 |
| 1971-72 | 3.33 | 10,511.7 | 26,010.8 | 40.4 |
| 1973-74 | 3.16 | 11,408.7 | 30,168.5 | 37.8 |
| 1975-76 | 2.86 | 14,218.7 | 35,968.5 | 39.5 |
| 1977-78 | 2.55 | 17,697.7 | 51,152.1 | 34.6 |
| 1988-89 | 1.07 | 44,156.6 | 122,730.2 | 36.0 |
| Source: County of San Luis Obispo 1989. | ||||
| Table C.40 Distribution of property tax payments from Diablo Canyon, 1975, 1978, and 1988 (in dollars) | |||
| 1974-75 | 1977-78 | 1988-89 | |
| San Luis Obispo County | 2,357,254 | 4,309,248 | 13,081,327 |
| Port San Luis Harbor District | 103,531 | 211,166 | 580,329 |
| City of Pismo Beach | 11,323 | 3,206 | 30,592 |
| Special districts | 3,479 | 524,021 | |
| County schools department | 309,731 | 591,780 | 1,643,189 |
| Atascadero Unified School District | 33,348 | 70,615 | 454,024 |
| Lucia Mar Unified School District | 69,225 | 80,915 | 470,700 |
| Paso Robles | 20,584 | 37,884 | 312,187 |
| San Luis Coastal Unified School District | 2,532,841 | 5,866,220 | 14,092,286 |
| Shandon Unified School District | 690 | 1,001 | 86,735 |
| Templeton Unified School District | 4,902 | 7,800 | 87,080 |
| Community College District | 870,197 | 1,229,082 | 2,769,846 |
| Total property taxes | 6,313,626 | 12,412,396 | 34,132,316 |
| Source: NUREG/CR-2749, vol. 5; Stillwell 1990. | |||
| Table C.41 San Luis Coastal Unified School District tax rate and tax income, 1969-1989 | ||||
| Fiscal year | Tax rate (%) | Local property tax income ($ x 103) |
Total school district income ($ x 103) |
Property tax as % of total income |
| 1969-70 | 4.47 | 5,409.9 | 7,124.1 | 75.9 |
| 1972-73 | 4.68 | 7,500.3 | 9,560.8 | 78.4 |
| 1975-76 | 4.03 | 10,655.3 | 13,583.0 | 78.4 |
| 1977-78 | 3.95 | 15,456.7 | 18,836.5 | 82.1 |
| 1987-88 | NAa | 26,639.4 | 32,446.3 | 82.1 |
| 1988-89 | NA | 29,026.0 | 36,233.5 | 80.1 |
| aNA = not
applicable. Sources: For 1969 through 1978 figures, NUREG/CR-2749, vol. 5. For 1987-89 values, Stillwell 1990. | ||||
| Table C.42 Estimated economic effects of Diablo Canyon on San Luis Obispo County | |||
| 1975 | 1978 | 1990 | |
| Employment | |||
| Direct basic employment | 1,799 | 1,121 | 1,160 |
| Indirect employment | 1,354 | 920 | 749 |
| Total employment | 3,153 | 2,041 | 1,909 |
| Percentage of study area employment | 6.5 | 3.5 | 1.8 |
|
Income (1989 $) | |||
| Direct income | 120,094,200 | 80,425,800 | 49,839,400 |
| Indirect income | 19,821,900 | 13,462,200 | 13,418,000 |
| Total income | 139,916,100 | 93,888,000 | 63,257,000 |
| Percentage of study area income | 9.1 | 4.7 | 1.7 |
| Sources: For 1975 and 1978 estimates, NUREG/CR-2749, vol. 5. The 1990 estimate is based on the approach used in the Mountain West study. | |||
| Table C.43 Projected employment effects of Diablo Canyon refurbishment on San Luis Obispo County, 2023 | |
| Refurbishment direct employment | 1932 |
| Refurbishment indirect employment | 1310 |
| Total Diablo Canyon-related employment | 3242 |
| Percentage of San Luis Obispo County employment | 1.8 |
| Source: ORNL staff computations based on the approach used in NUREG/CR-2749, vol. 5. | |
| Table C.44 Projected employment effects of Diablo Canyon license renewal on San Luis Obispo County, 2023 | |
| Existing direct and indirect employment | 1909 |
| Increase in direct employment | 107 |
| Increase in indirect employment | 69 |
| Total plant-related employment | 2085 |
| Percentage of San Luis Obispo County employment | 1.2 |
| Source: ORNL staff computations based on the approach used in NUREG/CR-2749, vol 5. | |
| Table C.45 Population growth associated with Indian Point Units 2 and 3: Dutchess and Westchester counties, 1972-1990 | |||||||||
| Work force | Dutchess County | Westchester County | |||||||
| Year | Construction | Operations | Total | Project-related in-migrant populationa | County's total populationb | Project-related population as % of total | Project-related in-migrant populationa | County's total populationb | Project-related population as % of total |
| 1972 | 2,400 | 0 | 2,400 | 390 | 226,673 | 0.17 | 309 | 888,691 | 0.03 |
| 1975 | 0 | 500 | 500 | 158 | 233,403 | 0.07 | 123 | 880,187 | 0.01 |
| 1980 | 0 | 825 | 825 | 259 | 245,055 | 0.10 | 189 | 866,599 | 0.02 |
| 1985 | 0 | 1,110 | 1,110 | 344 | 252,182 | 0.14 | 262 | 870,810 | 0.03 |
| 1990 | 0 | 1,335 | 1,335 | 415 | 259,462 | 0.16 | 316 | 874,866 | 0.04 |
| aIncludes both direct and
indirect workers and
families. bPopulation assumed to grow at constant annual rate between known points. Sources: U.S. Bureau of the Census 1988; Krausharr 1990; ConEd 1990; PASNY 1990; ORNL staff computations. | |||||||||
| Table C.46 Estimated construction-related population growth in Dutchess County, New York, 1972 | |
| Direct growth | |
| Number of direct workers | 2400 |
| Number of direct workers in Dutchess County (17.3% of total) | 415 |
| Number who in-migrated (35% of residents) | 145 |
| Number of in-migrants with families (51%) | 74 |
| Average household size | x 3.25 |
| Total in-migrants plus families | 241 |
| Number of in-migrants without families (49%) | +71 |
| Total direct growth | 312 |
| Indirect growth | |
| Ratio indirect/direct jobs | 0.65 |
| Number of indirect workers | 1560 |
| Number of study area residents (40% of total) | 624 |
| Number of in-migrants (5% of residents) | 31 |
| Number of in-migrants with families (66%) | 21 |
| Average household size | x 3.25 |
| Total in-migrants plus families | 68 |
| Number of in-migrants without families (33%) | +10 |
| Total indirect growth | 78 |
| Total growth | |
| Total direct growth | 312 |
| Total indirect growth | +78 |
| Total estimated construction-related growth | 390 |
| Sources: Number of direct workers from AEC Docket 50-247, p. IV-4. Percentage of study area residents from ConEd 1990 and PASNY 1990. Average household size from NUREG/CR-2750. Other data from construction experience at other nuclear stations; ORNL staff computations. | |
| Table C.47 Estimated construction-related population growth in Westchester County, New York, 1972 | |
| Direct growth | |
| Number of direct workers | 2400 |
| Number of workers in Westchester County (12.7% of total) | 305 |
| Number who in-migrated (35% of residents) | 107 |
| Number of in-migrants with families (51%) | 55 |
| Average family size | x 3.25 |
| Total in-migrants plus families | 179 |
| Number of in-migrants without families (49%) | +52 |
| Total direct growth | 231 |
| Indirect growth | |
| Ratio indirect/direct jobs | 0.65 |
| Number of indirect workers | 1560 |
| Number of study area residents (40% of total) | 624 |
| Number of in-migrants (5% of residents) | 31 |
| Number of in-migrants with families (66%) | 21 |
| Average family size | x 3.25 |
| Total in-migrants plus families | 68 |
| Number of in-migrants without families (33%) | +10 |
| Total indirect growth | 78 |
| Total growth | |
| Total direct growth | 231 |
| Total indirect growth | +78 |
| Total estimated construction-related growth | 309 |
| Sources: Number of direct workers from AEC Docket 50-247, p. IV-4. Percentage of study area residents from ConEd 1990 and PASNY 1990. Average family size from NUREG/CR-2750. Other data from construction experience at other nuclear stations; ORNL staff computations. | |
| Table C.48 Estimated plant-related population growth in Dutchess County, New York, 1990 | |
| Direct growth | |
| Number of direct workers | 1335 |
| Number of direct workers in Dutchess County (37.8% of total) |
505 |
| Number of in-migrants (30% of residents) | 152 |
| Number of in-migrants with families (66%) | 100 |
| Average family size | x 3.22 |
| Total in-migrants plus families | 322 |
| Number of in-migrants without families (33%) | +52 |
| Total direct growth | 374 |
| Indirect growth | |
| Ratio indirect/direct jobs | 0.65 |
| Number of indirect workers | 868 |
| Number of study area residents (40% of total) | 347 |
| Number of in-migrants (5% of residents) | 17 |
| Number of in-migrants with families (66%) | 11 |
| Average family size | x 3.22 |
| Total in-migrants plus families | 35 |
| Number of in-migrants without families (33%) | +6 |
| Total indirect growth | 41 |
| Total growth | |
| Total direct growth | 374 |
| Total indirect growth | +41 |
| Total estimated plant-related growth | 415 |
| Sources: Number of direct workers and percentage of study area residents from ConEd 1990 and PASNY 1990. Average family size from 1990 U.S. Census of Population. Other data from operating experience at other nuclear stations; ORNL staff computations. | |
| Table C.49 Estimated plant-related population growth in Westchester County, New York, 1990 | |
| Direct growth | |
| Number of direct workers | 1335 |
| Number of direct workers in Westchester County (27.8% of total) | 371 |
| Number of in-migrants (30% of residents) | 111 |
| Number of in-migrants with families (66%) | 74 |
| Average family size | x 3.22 |
| Total in-migrants plus families | 238 |
| Number of in-migrants without families (33%) | +37 |
| Total direct growth | 275 |
| Indirect growth | |
| Ratio indirect/direct jobs | 0.65 |
| Number of indirect workers | 868 |
| Number of study area residents (40% of total) | 347 |
| Number of in-migrants (5% of residents) | 17 |
| Number of in-migrants with families (66%) | 11 |
| Average family size | x 3.22 |
| Total in-migrants plus families | 35 |
| Number of in-migrants without families (33%) | +6 |
| Total indirect growth | 41 |
| Total growth | |
| Total direct growth | 275 |
| Total indirect growth | +41 |
| Total estimated plant-related growth | 316 |
| Sources: Number of direct workers and percentage of study area residents from ConEd 1990 and PASNY 1990. Average family size from 1990 U.S. Census of Population. Other data from operating experience at other nuclear stations; ORNL staff computations. | |
| Table C.50 Projected refurbishment-related population growth in Dutchess County, New York, 2012 | |
| Direct growth | |
| Number of direct workers | 2273 |
| Number of workers projected to live in Dutchess
County (17.3% of total) |
393 |
| Number of in-migrants (35% of residents) | 138 |
| Number of in-migrants with families (51%) | 70 |
| Average family size | x 3.22 |
| Total in-migrants plus families | 225 |
| Number of in-migrants without families (49%) | +68 |
| Total direct growth | 293 |
| Indirect growth | |
| Ratio indirect/direct jobs | 0.65 |
| Number of indirect workers | 1477 |
| Number of study area residents (40% of total) | 591 |
| Number of in-migrants (5.0% of residents) | 30 |
| Number of in-migrants with families (66%) | 20 |
| Average family size | 3.22 |
| Total in-migrants plus families | 64 |
| Number of in-migrants without families (33%) | +10 |
| Total indirect growth | 74 |
| Total growth | |
| Total direct growth | 293 |
| Total indirect growth | +74 |
| Total projected refurbishment-related growth | 367 |
| Sources: Number of direct workers from SEA 1994. Average family size from 1990 U.S. Census of Population. Percentage of study area residents from ConEd 1990 and PASNY 1990. Other data from estimates concerning the construction of Indian Point and other nuclear stations; ORNL staff computations. | |
| Table C.51 Projected refurbishment-related population growth in Westchester County, New York, 2012 | |
| Direct growth | |
| Number of direct workers | 2273 |
| Number of workers projected to live in Westchester County (12.7% of total) | 289 |
| Number of in-migrants (35% of residents) | 101 |
| Number of in-migrants with families (51%) | 52 |
| Average family size | x 3.22 |
| Total in-migrants plus families | 167 |
| Number of in-migrants without families (49%) | +49 |
| Total direct growth | 216 |
| Indirect growth | |
| Ratio indirect/direct jobs | 0.65 |
| Number of indirect workers | 1477 |
| Number of study area residents (40% of total) | 591 |
| Number of in-migrants (5.0% of residents) | 30 |
| Number of in-migrants with families (66%) | 20 |
| Average family size | x3.22 |
| Total in-migrants plus families | 64 |
| Number of in-migrants without families (33%) | 10 |
| Total indirect growth | 74 |
| Total growth | |
| Total direct growth | 216 |
| Total indirect growth | +74 |
| Total projected refurbishment-related growth | 290 |
| Sources: Number of direct workers from SEA 1994. Average family size from 1990 U.S. Census of Population. Percentage of study area residents from ConEd 1990 and PASNY 1990. Other data from estimates concerning the construction of Indian Point and other nuclear stations; ORNL staff computations. | |
| Table C.52 Projected plant-related population growth in Dutchess County, New York, during the license renewal term | |
| Direct growth | |
| Number of direct workers | 120 |
| Number of workers projected to live in Dutchess County (37.8% of total) | 45 |
| Number of in-migrants (30% of residents) | 13 |
| Number of in-migrants with families (66%) | 9 |
| Average family size | x 3.22 |
| Total in-migrants plus families | 29 |
| Number of in-migrants without families (33%) | +4 |
| Total direct growth | 33 |
| Indirect growth | |
| Ratio indirect/direct jobs | 0.65 |
| Number of indirect workers | 78 |
| Number of study area residents (40% of total) | 31 |
| Number of in-migrants (5% of residents) | 2 |
| Number of in-migrants with families (66%) | 2 |
| Average family size | x 3.22 |
| Total in-migrants plus families | 6 |
| Number of in-migrants without families (33%) | +0 |
| Total indirect growth | 6 |
| Total growth | |
| Total direct growth | 33 |
| Total indirect growth | +6 |
| Total projected plant-related growth | 39 |
| Sources: Number of direct workers from NRC work force estimates (1989). Average family size from 1990 U.S. Census of Population. Percentage of study area residents from ConEd 1990 and PASNY 1990. Other data from operations at Indian Point and other nuclear stations; ORNL staff computations. | |
| Table C.53 Projected plant-related population growth in Westchester County, New York, during the license renewal term | |
| Direct growth | |
| Number of direct workers | 120 |
| Number of workers projected in live in Westchester County (27.8% of total) | 33 |
| Number of in-migrants (30% of residents) | 10 |
| Number of in-migrants with families (66%) | 7 |
| Average family size | x 3.22 |
| Total in-migrants plus families | 23 |
| Number of in-migrants without families (33%) | +3 |
| Total direct growth | 26 |
| Indirect growth | |
| Ratio indirect/direct jobs | 0.65 |
| Number of indirect workers | 78 |
| Number of study area residents (40% of total) | 31 |
| Number of in-migrants (5% of residents) | 2 |
| Number of in-migrants with families (66%) | 2 |
| Average family size | x 3.22 |
| Total in-migrants plus families | 6 |
| Number of in-migrants without families (33%) | +0 |
| Total indirect growth | 6 |
| Total growth | |
| Total direct growth | 26 |
| Total indirect growth | +6 |
| Total projected plant-related growth | 32 |
| Sources: Number of direct workers from NRC work force estimates (1989). Average family size from 1990 U.S. Census of Population. Percentage of study area residents from ConEd 1990 and PASNY 1990. Average family size from U.S. Census of Population Estimates (1985). Other data from operations at Indian Point and other nuclear stations; ORNL staff computations. | |
| Table C.54 Indian Point tax payments to local government (1989 dollars) | |||
| Jurisdiction | 1980 | 1985 | 1989 |
| Indian Point Unit 2 | |||
| Town of Cortlandt | 4,653,344 | 4,783,440 | 5,743,766a |
| Buchanan | 1,311,318 | 1,211,437 | 1,396,344 |
| Hendrick Hudson School District | 7,934,365 | 7,188,180 | 9,086,374 |
| Total | 13,899,027 | 13,183,057 | 16,226,484 |
| Indian Point Unit 3 | |||
| Town of Cortlandt | 1,698,601 | 408,255 | 81,464 |
| Buchanan | 915,226 | 635,389 | 558,480 |
| Hendrick Hudson School District | 3,349,628 | 1,889,939 | 841,712 |
| Total | 5,963,455 | 2,933,583 | 1,481,656 |
| Total both units | 19,862,482 | 19,993,105 | 17,708,140 |
| a Indian Point Unit 2 tax to
town of Cortlandt is for 1990. Sources: Partenheimer 1990; ORNL/NUMARC survey of all utilities (see Section C.6). | |||
| Table C.55 Assessed value of Indian Point Units 2 and 3 as a percentage of total assessed value, 1989-1990 | ||||
| Assessed value (dollars) | Assessed value of Units 2 and 3 as % of jurisdiction's total | |||
| Jurisdiction | Indian Point Unit 2 | Indian Point Unit 3 | All properties in jurisdiction | |
| Cortlandt | 40,112,900 | 9,922,590 | 79,740,587 | 62.7 |
| Hudson School
District |
40,112,900 | 3,715,840 | 80,867,329 | 54.2 |
| Buchanan | 37,200,880 | 12,826,470 | 54,451,569 | 91.8 |
| Sources: Town of Cortlandt 1990a, b; Hudson School District 1990; Jankowski 1990; Burchman 1990; Partenheimer 1990. | ||||
| Table C.56 Revenue provided by Indian Point to taxing jurisdictions, 1989-1990 | |||
| Taxing jurisdiction | Total revenues ($ x 103) |
Revenue from Indian Point ($ x 103) |
Revenue from Indian Point as % of total |
| Cortlandt | 17,740.7 | 5,906.7 | 33.3 |
| Hudson School District | 26,600.0 | 9,928.1 | 37.2 |
| Buchanan | 3,940.5 | 1,954.8 | 49.6 |
| Sources: Town of Cortlandt 1990a; Partenheimer 1990; Burchman 1990; Jankowski 1990. | |||
| Table C.57 Estimated economic effects of Indian Point on Dutchess and Westchester counties, 1990 | ||
| Dutchess County | Westchester County | |
| Employment | ||
| Direct basic | 505 | 371 |
| Indirect | 500 | 368 |
| Total | 1,005 | 739 |
| Percentage of study area employment | 0.83 (est.) | 0.14 |
| Income (1989 $) | ||
| Direct | 18,791,100 | 13,805,900 |
| Indirect | 11,307,900 | 8,322,700 |
| Total | 30,099,000 | 22,128,700 |
| Percentage of study area income | 0.38 (est.) | 0.08 |
| Source: ORNL staff computations based on the approach used in NUREG/CR-2750. | ||
| Table C.58 Projected employment effects of Indian Point refurbishment on Dutchess and Westchester counties, 2012 | ||
| Affected area | Dutchess County | Westchester County |
| Refurbishment direct employment | 393 | 289 |
| Refurbishment indirect employment | 591 | 591 |
| Total Indian Point-related employment | 984 | 880 |
| Percentage of county's employment | 0.5 | 0.2 |
| Source: ORNL staff computations based on the approach used in NUREG/CR-2750. | ||
| Table C.59 Projected employment effects of Indian Point license renewal on Dutchess and Westchester counties, 2015 | ||
| Affected area | Dutchess County | Westchester County |
| Existing direct and indirect plant-related employment | 1005 | 739 |
| Increase in direct employment | 45 | 33 |
| Increase in indirect employment | 45 | 33 |
| Total plant-related employment | 1095 | 805 |
| Percentage of study area employment | 0.60 | 0.13 |
| Source: ORNL staff computations based on the approach used in NUREG/CR-2750. | ||
| Table C.60 Population growth associated with the Oconee Nuclear Station: Oconee County, South Carolina, 1970-1990 | ||||||
| Work force | Project-related in-migrant populationa | County's total populationb | Project-related population as % of total | |||
| Year | Construction | Operations | Total | |||
| 1970 | 2,108 | NAc | 2,108 | 631 | 40,728 | 1.5 |
| 1971 | 2,342 | NA | 2,342 | 701 | 41,800 | 1.7 |
| 1975 | 0 | 462 | 462 | 277 | 43,700 | 0.6 |
| 1979 | 0 | 833 | 833 | 416 | 46,000 | 0.9 |
| 1985 | 300 | 900 | 1,200 | 232 | 51,973 | 0.4 |
| 1990 | 899 | 1,401 | 2,300 | 504 | 57,494 | 0.9 |
| aIncludes both direct and
indirect workers and
families. bPopulation assumed to grow at a constant annual rate between known points. cNA = not applicable. Sources: NUREG/CR-2749, vol. 7, p. 89; 1990 U.S. Census of Population; Duke Power Company 1990; ORNL staff computations. | ||||||
| Table C.61 Estimated plant-related population growth in Oconee County, South Carolina, 1990 | |
| Direct growth | |
| Number of direct workers | 2300 |
| Number of study area residents (50% of total) | 1150 |
| Number of in-migrants (16.4% of residents) | 189 |
| Number of in-migrants with families (77%) | 146 |
| Average family size | x 3.16 |
| Total in-migrants plus families | 461 |
| Number of in-migrants without families (23%) | +43 |
| Total direct growth | 504 |
| Indirect growth | |
| Ratio indirect/direct jobs | 0.41 |
| Number of indirect workers | 943 |
| Number of study area residents (100% of total) | 943 |
| Number of in-migrants (0% of residents) | 0 |
| Number of in-migrants with families | 0 |
| Average family size | x 3.16 |
| Total in-migrants plus families | 0 |
| Number of in-migrants without families | +0 |
| Total indirect growth | 0 |
| Total growth | |
| Total direct growth | 504 |
| Total indirect growth | +0 |
| Total estimated plant-related growth | 504 |
| Sources: Number of direct workers and percentage of study area residents from the Duke Power Company 1990. Average family size from 1990 U.S. Census of Population. Other data from NUREG/CR-2749, vol. 7. pp. 65-87; ORNL staff computations. | |
| Table C.62 Projected refurbishment-related population growth in Oconee County, South Carolina, 2012 | |
| Direct growth | |
| Number of direct workers | 2273 |
| Number of study area residents (25.4% of total) | 577 |
| Number of in-migrants (50% of residents) | 289 |
| Number of in-migrants with families (33.3%) | 96 |
| Average family size | x 3.16 |
| Total in-migrants plus families | 303 |
| Number of in-migrants without families (66.6%) | +193 |
| Total direct growth | 496 |
| Indirect growth | |
| Ratio indirect/direct jobs | 0.052 |
| Number of indirect workers | 118 |
| Number of study area residents (100% of total) | 118 |
| Number of in-migrants (0% of residents) | 0 |
| Number of in-migrants with families | 0 |
| Average family size | x 3.16 |
| Total in-migrants plus families | 0 |
| Number of in-migrants without families | +0 |
| Total indirect growth | 0 |
| Total growth | |
| Total direct growth | 496 |
| Total indirect growth | +0 |
| Total projected refurbishment-related growth | 496 |
| Sources: Direct workers from SEA 1994. Average family size from 1990 U.S. Census of Population. Other data from NUREG/CR-2749, vol. 7, pp. 62-87; ORNL staff computations. | |
| Table C.63 Projected plant-related population growth in Oconee County, South Carolina, during the license renewal term | |
| Direct growth | |
| Number of direct workers | 180 |
| Number of study area residents (50% of total) | 90 |
| Number of in-migrants (16.4% of residents) | 15 |
| Number of in-migrants with families (77%) | 12 |
| Average family size | x 3.16 |
| Total in-migrants plus families | 38 |
| Number of in-migrants without families (0%) | +3 |
| Total direct growth | 41 |
| Indirect growth | |
| Ratio indirect/direct jobs | 0.41 |
| Number of indirect workers | 74 |
| Number of study area residents (100% of total) | 74 |
| Number of in-migrants (0% of residents) | 0 |
| Number of in-migrants with families (0%) | 0 |
| Average family size | x 3.16 |
| Total in-migrants plus families | 0 |
| Number of in-migrants without families (0%) | +0 |
| Total indirect growth | 0 |
| Total growth | |
| Total direct growth | 41 |
| Total indirect growth | +0 |
| Total projected plant-related growth | 41 |
| Sources: Direct workers from NRC work force estimates (1989). Average family size from 1990 U.S. Census of Population. Other data from NUREG/CR-2749, vol. 7, pp. 62-87; ORNL staff computations. | |
| Table C.64 Oconee County property taxes (1989 dollars) | ||||
| Source of revenue | 1975-76 | 1980-81 | 1985-86 | 1989-90 |
| County assessment | 111,034,000 | 91,198,000 | 122,277,000 | 172,718,000 |
| Total county property taxes | 15,166,000 | 12,058,000 | 14,150,000 | 22,675,000 |
| Licensee taxes | 7,592,000 | 4,791,000 | 5,098,000 | 6,588,000 |
| Total county revenue | 30,489,000 | 29,915,000 | 35,442,000 | 46,329,000 |
| Percentage of total tax revenues from licensee | 50.1 | 39.7 | 36.0 | 29.1 |
| Percentage of total revenues from licensee | 24.9 | 16.0 | 14.4 | 14.2 |
| Sources: NUREG/CR-2749, vol. 7; Oconee County 1980, 1985, and 1989, Budget Ordinances: 80-7, 85-5, and 89-3; Oconee County Independent Auditor's Report; Bridges 1990. | ||||
| Table C.65 Estimated economic effects of Oconee Nuclear Station on Oconee County | ||
| Affected area | 1971 | 1990 |
| Employment | ||
| Direct basic | 595 | 1,150 |
| Indirect | 111 | 948 |
| Total | 706 | 2,098 |
| Percentage of county employment | 3.3 | 6.5 |
| Income (1989 $) | ||
| Direct | 15,097,000 | 46,033,000 |
| Indirect | 1,424,000 | 17,940,000 |
| Total | 16,520,000 | 63,973,000 |
| Percentage of county income | 4.4 | 7.5 |
| Source: For 1971, NUREG/CR-2749, vol. 7. Other estimates based on employment estimates from Section C.4.5.1 and multipliers from NUREG/CR-2749. Estimates of county employment and income used to calculate percentages are from NPA 1990. | ||
| Table C.66 Projected employment effects of Oconee Nuclear Station refurbishment on Oconee County, 2012 | |
| Refurbishment direct employment | 577 |
| Refurbishment indirect employment | 118 |
| Total plant-related employment | 695 |
| Percentage of Oconee County employment | 1.9 |
| Source: ORNL staff computations based on the approach used in NUREG/CR-2749, vol. 7. | |
| Table C.67 Projected employment and economic effects of Oconee Nuclear Station license renewal on Oconee County, 2013 | |
| Existing direct and indirect plant-related employment | 1150 |
| Increase in direct employment | 90 |
| Increase in indirect employment | 74 |
| Total plant-related employment | 1314 |
| Percentage of Oconee County employment | 3.6 |
| Source: ORNL staff computations based on the approach used in NUREG/CR-2749, vol. 7. | |
| Table C.68 Population growth associated with Three Mile Island: Londonderry Township, Middletown, and Royalton, Pennsylvania, 1970-1990 | ||||||
| Work force | Project-related in-migrant populationa | Area's total populationb | Project-related population as % of total | |||
| Year | Construction | Operations | Total | |||
| 1970 | 1,991 | 86 | 2,077 | 223 | 13,573 | 1.6 |
| 1972 | 2,746 | 126 | 2,872 | 310 | 14,225 | 2.2 |
| 1975 | 1,453 | 342 | 1,795 | 256 | 15,316 | 1.7 |
| 1979 | 0 | 565 | 565 | 110 | 16,243 | 0.7 |
| 1984 | 0 | 1,399 | 1,399 | 272 | 16,790 | 1.6 |
| 1990 | 0 | 1,086 | 1,086 | 246 | 14,636 | 1.7 |
| a Includes both direct and
indirect workers and families. b Population assumed to grow at a constant annual rate between known points. Sources: NUREG/CR-2749, vol. 12, p. 77; General Public Utilities Corporation 1990; ORNL staff computations. | ||||||
| Table C.69 Estimated plant-related population growth in Middletown, Royalton, and Londonderry Township, Pennsylvania, 1990 | |
| Direct growth | |
| Number of direct workers | 1086 |
| Number of study area residents (23% of total) | 250 |
| Number of in-migrants (22% of residents) | 55 |
| Number of in-migrants with families (100%) | 55 |
| Average family size | x 3.1 |
| Total in-migrants plus families | 171 |
| Number of in-migrants without families (0%) | +0 |
| Total direct growth | 171 |
| Indirect growth | |
| Ratio indirect/direct jobs | 0.106 |
| Number of indirect workers | 115 |
| Number of study area residents (85% of total) | 98 |
| Number of in-migrants (33.3% of residents) | 33 |
| Number of in-migrants with families (61%) | 20 |
| Average family size | x 3.1 |
| Total in-migrants plus families | 62 |
| Number of in-migrants without families (39%) | +13 |
| Total indirect growth | 75 |
| Total growth | |
| Total direct growth | 171 |
| Total indirect growth | +75 |
| Total estimated plant-related growth | 246 |
| Sources: Number of direct workers and percentage of study area residents from General Public Utilities Corporation 1990. Average family size from 1990 U.S. Census of Population. Other data from NUREG/CR-2749, vol. 12, pp. 66-78; ORNL staff computations. | |
| Table C.70 Projected refurbishment-related population growth in Middletown, Royalton, and Londonderry Township, Pennsylvania, 2013 | |
| Direct growth | |
| Number of direct workers | 2273 |
| Number of study area residents (8.0% of total) | 182 |
| Number of in-migrants (72% of residents) | 131 |
| Number of in-migrants with families (9.0%) | 12 |
| Average family size | x 3.1 |
| Total in-migrants plus families | 37 |
| Number of in-migrants without families (91%) | +119 |
| Total direct growth | 156 |
| Indirect growth | |
| Ratio indirect/direct jobs | 0.022 |
| Number of indirect workers | 50 |
| Number of study area residents (85% of total) | 43 |
| Number of in-migrants (33% of residents) | 14 |
| Number of in-migrants with families (62%) | 9 |
| Average family size | x 3.1 |
| Total in-migrants plus families | 28 |
| Number of in-migrants without families (38%) | +5 |
| Total indirect growth | 33 |
| Total growth | |
| Total direct growth | 156 |
| Total indirect growth | +33 |
| Total projected refurbishment-related growth | 189 |
| Sources: Number of direct workers from SEA 1994. Average family size from 1990 U.S. Census of Population. Other data from NUREG/CR-2749, vol. 12, pp. 50-55, 74-76; ORNL staff computations. | |
| Table C.71 Projected plant-related population growth in Middletown, Royalton, and Londonderry Township, Pennsylvania, during the license renewal term | |
| Direct growth | |
| Number of direct workers | 60 |
| Number of study area residents (23% of total) | 14 |
| Number of in-migrants (22% of residents) | 3 |
| Number of in-migrants with families (100%) | 3 |
| Average household size | x 3.1 |
| Total in-migrants plus families | 9 |
| Number of in-migrants without families (0%) | +0 |
| Total direct growth | 9 |
| Indirect growth | |
| Ratio indirect/direct jobs | 0.106 |
| Number of indirect workers | 6 |
| Number of study area residents (85% of total) | 5 |
| Number of in-migrants (33.3% of residents) | 2 |
| Number of in-migrants with families (61%) | 1 |
| Average family size | x 3.1 |
| Total in-migrants plus families | 3 |
| Number of in-migrants without families (39%) | +1 |
| Total indirect growth | 4 |
| Total growth | |
| Total direct growth | 9 |
| Total indirect growth | +4 |
| Total projected plant-related growth | 13 |
| Sources: Number of direct workers from NRC work force estimates (1989). Percentage of study area residents from General Public Utilities Corporation 1990. Average family size from 1990 U.S. Census of Population. Other data from NUREG/CR-2749, vol. 12, pp. 66-78; ORNL staff computations. | |
| Table C.72 Londonderry Township revenue and taxes received (total revenue in constant 1980 dollars) | |||
| Source of funds | 1980 | 1985 | 1989 |
| Real estate transfer taxes | 11,189 | 15,931 | 17,780 |
| Earned income taxes | 181,858 | 235,599 | 268,818 |
| Occupational privilege taxes | 11,819 | 14,697 | 13,255 |
| Amusement tax | 0 | 393 | 139 |
| Total taxes | 204,866 | 266,620 | 299,992 |
| Payment in lieu of taxes (PURTAa receipts) | 1,988 | 3,390 | 3,723 |
| Other revenue | 70,323 | 60,697 | 180,787 |
| Total revenue | 277,177 | 255,178b | 330,953c |
| aPURTA = Public Utility
Realty Tax Assessment of 1970. bActual total was $330,707; converted to 1980 $. cActual total was $484,502; converted to 1980 $. Source: Londonderry Township 1990. | |||
| Table C.73 Borough of Middletown revenue and taxes received, 1980-1988 (in dollars) | |||
| Source of funds | 1980 | 1985 | 1988 |
| Taxes and assessments | 461,582 | 619,595 | 653,728 |
| Other general revenues | 1,425,752 | 410,952 | 522,498 |
| Special revenues and other financing sources | 1,157,301a | 542,006 | 685,378 |
| Electricity/utility sales | 1,572,283 | 3,273,839a | 4,027,375a |
| Total revenues | 4,616,918 | 4,842,392 | 5,888,979 |
| a Includes sewer and water
service billings. Source: Middletown Borough combined Financial Statements 1980, 1985, and 1988. | |||
| Table C.74 Borough of Royalton revenue and taxes received, 1980-1989 (in dollars) | |||
| Source of funds | 1980 | 1985 | 1989 |
| Real estate | 15,677 | 15,288 | 18,332 |
| Per capita taxes | 2,350 | 2,528 | 2,618 |
| Real estate | |||
| Transfer taxes | 884 | 1,422 | 3,870 |
| Earned income taxes | 24,463 | 27,630 | 42,323 |
| Total taxes | 43,374 | 46,868 | 67,143 |
| Sales of electricity | 167,216 | 196,135 | 240,293 |
| Other revenue | 41,130 | 49,817 | 191,807 |
| Total revenue | 251,720 | 292,820 | 499,243 |
| Source: Royalton Borough 1990; Young 1990. | |||
| Table C.75 Traffic counts in the vicinity of Three Mile Island,a selected years | ||
| Year | Route 441 at Royalton | Route 230 at Geyer's Church |
| 1963 | 5,900 | 18,500 |
| 1966 | 6,200 | 18,000 |
| 1972 | 10,900 | 12,900 |
| 1975 | 8,800 | 12,800 |
| aCounts in both directions
aggregated. Source: NUREG/CR-2749, vol. 12, p. 113. | ||
| Table C.76 Estimated economic effects of Three Mile Island on study area | |||
| Affected area | 1972 | 1978 | 1990 |
| Employment | |||
| Direct basic | 258 | 178 | 250 |
| Indirect | 1 | 2 | 98 |
| Total | 259 | 180 | 348 |
| Percentage of study area employment | 2.1 | 1.2 | 13.0 |
| Income (1989 $) | |||
| Direct | 11,809,000 | 4,636,000 | 9,208,000 |
| Indirect | 24,000 | 31,000 | 1,843,000 |
| Total | 11,833,000 | 4,667,000 | 11,051,000 |
| Percentage of study area | 2.7 | 2.0 | 17.0 |
| Sources: For 1972 and 1978 estimates, NUREG/CR-2749, vol. 12. The 1990 estimate is based on the approach used in the Mountain West study. | |||
| Table C.77 Projected employment effects of Three Mile Island refurbishment on the study area, 2013 | |
| Refurbishment direct employment | 182 |
| Refurbishment indirect employment | 43 |
| Total plant-related employment | 225 |
| Percentage of study area employment | 6.0 |
| Source: ORNL staff computations based on the approach used in NUREG/CR-2749, vol. 12. | |
| Table C.78 Projected employment effects of Three Mile Island license renewal on the study area, 2013 | |
| Existing direct and indirect employment | 348 |
| Increase in direct employment | 14 |
| Increase in indirect employment | 5 |
| Total plant-related employment | 367 |
| Percentage of study area employment | 9.8 |
| Source: ORNL staff computations based on the approach used in NUREG/CR-2749, vol. 12. | |
| Table C.79 Population growth associated with Wolf Creek Generating Station: Coffey County, Kansas, 1984-1989 | ||||||
| Work force | Project-related in-migrant populationa | Area's populationb | Project-related population as % of total | |||
| Year | Construction | Operations | Total | |||
| 1984 | 5500 | 0 | 5500 | 2329 | 9001 | 20.5 |
| 1985 | 0 | 692 | 692 | 755 | 8910 | 8.5 |
| 1989 | 0 | 1044 | 1044 | 1137 | 8559 | 13.3 |
| aIncludes both direct and
indirect workers and
families. bPopulation assumed to change at a constant annual rate between known points; excludes refurbishment population that arrived after 1980 and left before 1990 census takings. Population in 1980 and 1990 was 9370 and 8404, respectively. Sources: Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation 1990; other data from construction at other nuclear plants; ORNL staff computations; U.S. Bureau of the Census 1988, 1900. | ||||||
| Table C.80 Estimated construction-related population growth in Coffey County, Kansas, 1984 | |
| Direct growth | |
| Number of direct workers | 5500 |
| Number of study area residents (20% of total) | 1100 |
| Number of in-migrants (70% of residents) | 770 |
| Number of in-migrants with families (51%) | 393 |
| Average family size | x 3.08 |
| Total in-migrants plus families | 1210 |
| Number of in-migrants without families (44%) | +377 |
| Total direct growth | 1587 |
| Indirect growth | |
| Ratio indirect/direct jobs | 0.05 |
| Number of indirect workers | 275 |
| Number of study area residents (95% of total) | 261 |
| Number of in-migrants (55% of residents) | 144 |
| Number of in-migrants with families (66%) | 95 |
| Average family size | x 3.08 |
| Total in-migrants plus families | 293 |
| Number of in-migrants without families (33%) | +49 |
| Total indirect growth | 342 |
| Total growth | |
| Total direct growth | 1587 |
| Total indirect growth | +342 |
| Total estimated construction-related growth | 2329 |
| Sources: Number of direct workers from the Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation 1990. Average family size from 1990 U.S. Census of Population. Other data from construction-period experience at other nuclear plants; ORNL staff computations. | |
| Table C.81 Estimated plant-related population growth in Coffey County, Kansas, 1989 | |
| Direct growth | |
| Number of direct workers | 1044 |
| Number of study area residents (50% of total) | 522 |
| Number of in-migrants (50% of residents) | 261 |
| Number of in-migrants with families (66%) | 172 |
| Average family size | x 3.08 |
| Total in-migrants plus families | 530 |
| Number of in-migrants without families (33%) | +89 |
| Total direct growth | 619 |
| Indirect growth | |
| Ratio indirect/direct jobs | 0.4 |
| Number of indirect workers | 418 |
| Number of study area residents (95% of total) | 397 |
| Number of in-migrants (55% of residents) | 218 |
| Number of in-migrants with families (66%) | 144 |
| Average family size | x 3.08 |
| Total in-migrants plus families | 444 |
| Number of in-migrants without families (33%) | +74 |
| Total indirect growth | 518 |
| Total growth | |
| Total direct growth | 619 |
| Total indirect growth | +518 |
| Total estimated plant-related growth | 1137 |
| Sources: Number of direct workers and percentage of study area residents from the Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation 1990. Average family size from 1990 U.S. Census of Population. Other data from operations period experience at other nuclear plants; ORNL staff computations. | |
| Table C.82 Projected refurbishment-related population growth in Coffey County, Kansas, 2024 | |
| Direct growth | |
| Number of direct workers | 2273 |
| Number of study area residents (20% of total) | 455 |
| Number of in-migrants (70% of residents) | 319 |
| Number of in-migrants with families (51%) | 163 |
| Average family size | x 3.08 |
| Total in-migrants plus families | 502 |
| Number of in-migrants without families (49%) | +156 |
| Total direct growth | 658 |
| Indirect growth | |
| Ratio indirect/direct jobs | 0.05 |
| Number of indirect workers | 114 |
| Number of study area residents (95% of total) | 108 |
| Number of in-migrants (55% of residents) | 59 |
| Number of in-migrants with families (66%) | 39 |
| Average family size | x 3.08 |
| Total in-migrants plus families | 120 |
| Number of in-migrants without families (33%) | +20 |
| Total indirect growth | 140 |
| Total growth | |
| Total direct growth | 658 |
| Total indirect growth | +140 |
| Total projected refurbishment-related growth | 798 |
| Sources: Number of direct workers from SEA 1994. Average family size from 1990 U.S. Census of Population. Other data from construction period experience at other nuclear plants; ORNL staff computations. | |
| Table C.83 Projected plant-related population growth in Coffey County, Kansas, during the license renewal term | |
| Direct growth | |
| Number of direct workers | 60 |
| Number of study area residents (50% of total) | 30 |
| Number of in-migrants (50% of residents) | 15 |
| Number of in-migrants with families (66%) | 10 |
| Average family size | x 3.08 |
| Total in-migrants plus families | 31 |
| Number of in-migrants without families (33%) | +5 |
| Total direct growth | 36 |
| Indirect growth | |
| Ratio indirect/direct jobs | 0.4 |
| Number of indirect workers | 24 |
| Number of study area residents (95% of total) | 23 |
| Number of in-migrants (55% of residents) | 13 |
| Number of in-migrants with families (66%) | 9 |
| Average family size | x 3.08 |
| Total in-migrants plus families | 28 |
| Number of in-migrants without families (33%) | +4 |
| Total indirect growth | 32 |
| Total growth | |
| Total direct growth | 36 |
| Total indirect growth | +32 |
| Total projected plant-related growth | 68 |
| Sources: Number of direct workers from NRC work force estimates (1989). Percentage of study area residents from the Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation 1990. Average family size from 1990 U.S. Census of Population. Other data from operations period experience at other nuclear plants; ORNL staff computations. | |
| Table C.84 Increases in rental rates and housing values, Coffey County and state of Kansas, 1970 and 1980 (in dollars) | ||
| Coffey County | State of Kansas | |
| Rental rates | ||
| 1970 | 46 | 75 |
| 1980 | 156 | 168 |
| Percentage change | 239 | 124 |
| Housing values | ||
| 1970 | 6,300 | 12,100 |
| 1980 | 24,300 | 37,800 |
| Percentage change | 286 | 212 |
| Sources: For 1970, U.S. Bureau of the Census 1972; for 1980, U.S. Bureau of the Census 1982. | ||
| Table C.85 Taxes paid by Wolf Creek Generating Station, 1980-1989 (constant 1989 dollars) | |||
| Jurisdiction | 1980 | 1985 | 1989 |
| State of Kansas | 268,004 | 732,610 | 729,602 |
| Coffey County | 3,249,980 | 9,869,732 | 14,061,868 |
| Burlington School District | 3,557,468 | 7,117,846 | 7,102,472 |
| Source: ORNL/NUMARC survey of all utilities (see Section C.6). | |||
| Table C.86 Estimated economic effects of Wolf Creek Generating Station on Coffey County, 1989 | |
| Employment | |
| Direct basic | 522 |
| Indirect | 397 |
| Total plant-related | 919 |
| Percentage of Coffey County employment | 17.5 |
| Income (1989 $) | |
| Direct | 27,601,000 |
| Indirect | 9,752,000 |
| Total plant-related | 37,352,000 |
| Percentage of Coffey County income | 22.5 |
| Source: ORNL staff computations based on approach used in NUREG/CR-2750. | |
| Table C.87 Projected employment effects of Wolf Creek Generating Station refurbishment on Coffey County, 2024 | |
| Refurbishment direct employment | 455 |
| Refurbishment indirect employment | 108 |
| Total plant-related employment | 563 |
| Percentage of Coffey County employment | 6.8 |
| Source: ORNL staff computations based on approach used in NUREG/CR-2750. | |
| Table C.88 Projected employment effects of Wolf Creek Generating Station license renewal on Coffey County, 2025 | |
| Existing direct and indirect employment | 522 |
| Increase in direct employment | 30 |
| Increase in indirect employment | 23 |
| Total plant-related employment | 575 |
| Percentage of Coffey County employment | 7.1 |
| Source: ORNL staff computations based on approach used in NUREG/CR-2750. | |
Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, November 01, 2016
Home
About Us
Popular Documents
Stay Connected
