Information Notice No. 92-35: Higher Than Predicted Erosion/Corrosion in Unisolable Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary Piping Inside Containment at a Boiling Water Reactor
UNITED STATES
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555
May 6, 1992
NRC INFORMATION NOTICE 92-35: HIGHER THAN PREDICTED EROSION/CORROSION IN
UNISOLABLE REACTOR COOLANT PRESSURE BOUNDARY
PIPING INSIDE CONTAINMENT AT A BOILING
WATER REACTOR
Addressees
All holders of operating licenses or construction permits for nuclear power
reactors.
Purpose
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing this information
notice to alert addressees to erosion/corrosion rates that could be higher
than predicted in certain unisolable reactor coolant pressure boundary
piping inside the containment drywell at boiling water reactors. It is
expected that recipients will review the information for applicability to
their facilities and consider actions, as appropriate, to avoid similar
problems. However, suggestions contained in this information notice are not
NRC requirements; therefore, no specific action or written response is
required.
Description of Circumstances
The Pennsylvania Power and Light Company (the licensee) recently performed
erosion/corrosion inspections at the Susquehanna Steam Electric Station,
Unit 1, and may have identified an unexpectedly high rate of erosion/
corrosion in certain main feedwater (FW) piping inside containment
(Attachment 1). Erosion of this portion of FW piping is of particular
concern since this portion cannot be isolated from the reactor vessel, and
erosion/corrosion inspection strategies may not direct attention to that
part of the FW system.
When the licensee began operating the unit commercially in June 1982, the
nominal wall thickness for the pipe was about 0.688 inch. During the
current refueling outage, wall thinning was found in one of the 20 inch by
12 inch reducing tee risers approximately 10 inches downstream from the tee
in the 12 inch pipe section, immediately above a circumferential pipe weld.
During the previous refueling outage (18 months ago) the licensee had
measured the pipe wall as 0.619 inch thick at that location. During the
current refueling outage, the licensee measured a thickness of 0.521 inch at
the same location. The licensee measured a thickness of 0.482 inch within
about 2 inches of that location. The licensee calculated a minimum
allowable wall thickness of 0.440 inch for that portion of FW pipe.
Previous experience and models had indicated an erosion wear rate of no more
than 0.085 inch each cycle. However, the most
9205010009
.
IN 92-35
May 6, 1992
Page 2 of 3
recent measurement indicates a higher wear rate that may be greater than
0.100 inch each cycle.
The licensee evaluated the data for the FW system and determined that
continued operation could not be justified for another fuel cycle.
Therefore, the licensee repaired, rather than replaced, the FW pipe in
accordance with Section XI of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers
(ASME) Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.
Discussion
The licensee determined that although it had expected to find erosion/
corrosion at this location, the magnitude of wall thinning exceeded
expectations. The licensee is continuing its investigation to determine the
root cause of the unexpected erosion/corrosion rate.
Related Generic Communications
Following a pipe rupture at the Surry Power Station in 1986, the NRC issued
Bulletin 87-01, "Thinning of Pipe Walls in Nuclear Power Plants," July 9,
1987. In this bulletin, the staff requested licensees and applicants to
inform the NRC about their programs for monitoring the wall thickness of
carbon steel piping in both safety-related and nonsafety-related high energy
fluid systems.
In 1989, following an audit of the erosion/corrosion programs at 10 plants,
the NRC issued Generic Letter (GL) 89-08, "Erosion/Corrosion-Induced Pipe
Wall Thinning," May 2, 1989. In this generic letter, the staff requested
licensees and applicants to implement long term erosion/corrosion monitoring
programs. The staff made this request to obtain assurances that the
addressees had implemented procedures or administrative controls to maintain
the structural integrity of all carbon steel systems carrying high energy
fluids.
The NRC also issued several information notices on the subject of erosion/
corrosion.
.
IN 92-35
May 6, 1992
Page 3 of 3
This information notice requires no specific action or written response. If
you have any questions about the information in this notice, please contact
one of the technical contacts listed below or the appropriate Office of
Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.
Charles E. Rossi, Director
Division of Operational Events Assessment
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Technical contacts: K. I. Parczewski, NRR S. Barber, Region I
(301) 504-2705 (717) 542-2134
David Gamberoni, NRR John White, Region I
(301) 504-1171 (215) 337-5114
Attachments:
1. Feedwater System Erosion/Corrosion Location
2. List of Recently Issued NRC Information Notices
.
Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021