Home > NRC Library > Document Collections > General Communications > Information Notices > 1988 > IN 88-47
UNITED STATES
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555
July 14, 1988
Information Notice No. 88-47: SLOWER-THAN-EXPECTED ROD-DROP TIMES
Addressees:
All holders of operating licenses or construction permits for
pressurized-water reactors.
Purpose:
This information notice is being provided to alert addressees to a potential
problem regarding slower-than-expected rod drop times. It is expected that
recipients will review the information for applicability to their facilities
and consider actions, as appropriate, to avoid similar problems. However,
suggestions contained in this information notice do not constitute NRC
requirements; therefore, no specific action or written response is required.
Description of Circumstances:
In a letter dated May 5, 1988, the licensee of Arkansas Nuclear One Unit 2
(ANO-2) informed the NRC that they were unable to meet the Technical Specifi-
cation regarding maximum drop time for control rods. The licensee discovered
the problem as a result of a change in the methodology used for measuring rod-
drop times. The test was part of the startup physics testing after refueling.
The new test methodology requires the interruption of power to the rod drive
mechanisms for all rods simultaneously by means of the reactor trip breakers.
The previous methodology called for the interruption of power to each
individual drive mechanism. Simultaneous interruption of power to all drive
mechanisms leads to a slower dissipation of stored energy in the holding
coils, hence increasing the measured rod-drop time. The new methodology is a
more realistic representation of the safety function. The licensee found it
necessary to review all of the accident analyses in the Final Safety Analysis
Report to ensure continued conformance with the licensing basis.
Discussion:
The rod-drop test at ANO-2 showed that the maximum drop time was 3.2 seconds,
although the Technical Specification required less than 3.0 seconds. The
staff found that the actions taken by the licensee were acceptable for dealing
with the changes to the safety margins. The licensee subsequently submitted a
request to amend the Technical Specification on an emergency basis. Because
problems similar to that at ANO-2 may occur at other plants, the staff would
like to inform all licensees of this experience so that they may take
appropriate
8807080366
. IN 88-47
July 14, 1988
Page 2 of 2
action to avoid requesting amendments on an emergency basis in regard to this
matter. The staff intends to incorporate the lessons learned from the ANO-2
experience in future reviews of accident analyses results, such as reload
reviews.
No specific action or written response is required by this information notice.
If you have any questions about this matter, please contact the technical
contact listed below or the Regional Administrator of the appropriate regional
office.
Charles E. Rossi, Director
Division of Operational Events Assessment
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Technical Contact: N. Prasad Kadambi, NRR
(301) 492-1153
Attachment: List of Recently Issued NRC Information Notices
. Attachment
IN 88-47
July 14, 1988
Page 1 of 1
LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUED
NRC INFORMATION NOTICES
_____________________________________________________________________________
Information Date of
Notice No._____Subject_______________________Issuance_______Issued to________
88-46 Licensee Report of 7/8/88 All holders of OLs
Defective Refurbished or CPs for nuclear
Circuit Breakers power reactors.
88-45 Problems In Protective 7/7/88 All holders of OLs
Relay and Circuit or CPs for nuclear
Breaker Coordination power reactors.
88-44 Mechanical Binding of 6/24/88 All holders of OLs
Spring Release Device or CPs for nuclear
in Westinghouse Type power reactors.
DS-416 Circuit Breakers
88-43 Solenoid Valve Problems 6/23/88 All holders of OLs
or CPs for nuclear
power reactors.
88-42 Circuit Breaker Failures 6/23/88 All holders of OLs
Due to Loose Charging or CPs for nuclear
Spring Motor Mounting Bolts power reactors.
88-41 Physical Protection 6/22/88 All holders of OLs
Weaknesses Identified or CPs for nuclear
Through Regulatory Ef- power reactors.
fectiveness Reviews (RERs)
88-40 Examiners' Handbook for 6/22/88 All holders of OLs
Developing Operator or CPs for nuclear
Licensing Examinations power reactors.
88-39 LaSalle Unit 2 Loss of 6/15/88 All holders of OLs
Recirculation Pumps With or CPs for BWRs.
Power Oscillation Event
88-38 Failure of Undervoltage 6/15/88 All holders of OLs
Trip Attachment on General or CPs for nuclear
Electric Circuit Breakers power reactors.
88-37 Flow Blockage of Cooling 6/14/88 All holders of OLs
Water to Safety System or CPs for nuclear
Components power reactors.
_____________________________________________________________________________
OL = Operating License
CP = Construction Permit
Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 29, 2012

