U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Request for Comments on Responses to Licensee Questions on High Radiation Area Controls
HPPOS-237 PDR-9111210358
Title: Request for Comments on Responses to Licensee
Questions on High Radiation Area Controls
See the memorandum from J. Wigginton to W. J. Pasciak (and
others) dated June 21, 1989. This memo provides guidance
on the temporary use of lead shielding as a long-term
solution in reducing radiation levels and states that
magnetic computer cards meet the locking requirements of 10
CFR 20.203 (c) (2) (iii). The health physics position also
applies to "new" 10 CFR 20.1601 (a) (3).
The NRC was asked to provide guidance to a licensee
concerning implementation of 10 CFR Part 20 and Technical
Specifications (Administration Section 6) requirements for
high radiation area controls. The licensee had questions
concerning IEIN-88-79 that alerted licensees to several
instances where plants had not properly controlled areas
having greater than 1000 mR/hr (improper use of the
"flashing light" option). Specifically, the licensee asked
whether temporary shielding may be used as a long-term
solution in reducing radiation levels below 1000 mR/hr (to
avoid locking an area >1000 mR/hr). The licensee also
requested guidance concerning the use of a computer card
(magnetic card) used in lieu of a classical, physical
key-lock to meet the locking requirements of 10 CFR 20.203
(c) (2) (iii) [or 10 CFR 20.1601 (a) (3)].
The NRC stated that other techniques to reduce source term
should be used (e.g., chemical decon, permanent shielding);
however, as long as reasonable progress is made toward the
long-term fix (and an effective system to preclude
unauthorized removal of temporary shielding exists), the
judicious use of temporary shielding could be justified on
an interim basis. In general, the radiation source
in-growth rate should allow for prudent and timely
compensatory action to avoid frequent use of temporary
shielding for this purpose.
An access control system governed by computer mag-cards is
acceptable and meets the STS and 10 CFR 20.203 (c) (2)
(iii) [or 10 CFR 20.1601 (a) (3)] requirements for locking
high radiation areas pursuant to the security requirements
of 10 CFR 73 [Physical Protection of Plants and Material,
Paragraph 73.2 (m)]. However, the licensee must maintain
positive control over each entry and satisfy all other
existing entry and surveillance requirements for high
radiation areas.
Regulatory references: 10 CFR 20.203, 10 CFR 20.1601,
Technical Specifications
Subject codes: 4.1, 5.3
Applicability: Reactors

